Re: [galaxy-dev] java options

2018-08-28 Thread Matthias Bernt
Hi Bjoern, So, it seems that the best option is to: - switching back to _JAVA_OPTIONS (which seems to be implemented also on usegalaxy.org) - handling the output in each java tool This is also what usegalaxy.eu is using and we have special destinations for java tools. Indeed, this seems t

Re: [galaxy-dev] java options

2018-08-28 Thread Björn Grüning
Hi Matthias, Hi Marius, Thanks for your comments. That's what I thought. > To me this sounds like something that really should be fixed in the > tool as presumably this affects every deployer. Hmm. The 'tool' would be java. As far as I have seen java is never/seldom in the tool dependencie

Re: [galaxy-dev] java options

2018-08-27 Thread Matthias Bernt
Hi Marius, Thanks for your comments. That's what I thought. > To me this sounds like something that really should be fixed in the > tool as presumably this affects every deployer. Hmm. The 'tool' would be java. As far as I have seen java is never/seldom in the tool dependencies. Hence, the sys

Re: [galaxy-dev] java options

2018-08-27 Thread Marius van den Beek
Hi Matthias, if a tool prints something to the stderr that is indeed considered to indicate a failure, and it's the default mostly because we don't want to break legacy tools that make this assumption. If you include a profile version in your tool or change your command section to this will more

[galaxy-dev] java options

2018-08-27 Thread Matthias Bernt
Dear list, I'm struggling to set java options for galaxy tools. Currently I use ` in my job_conf.xml and in the script I explored two ways to set java options: `_JAVA_OPTIONS="-Xmx5G -Xms1G -Djava.io.tmpdir=/work/songalax/tmp"` But then java prints "Picked up _JAVA_OPTIONS: ..." to stderr wh