Hi All,
I have some knowledges about RADSeq ... at least about the
bioinformatics part. This technology is growing up in my lab (marine
science) and I'm involve in few of those projects.
So I'm in!
Gildas
Le 23/11/2015 20:59, Tiago Antao a écrit :
On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 18:03:05 +
John
The same for me, I have another Hackathon ^^' the 14-16th of march.
Anyway, I can take part through the GitHUB.
Gildas
Le 24/11/2015 10:38, mabernard a écrit :
Dear all,
I work on many RADSeq projects, and I'm using Stacks for doing this. I
developpe(d) some scripts to describe the result,
Dears,
We observed this issue under galaxy release 15.07.
Tools with a param tag and type="data_column" in their xml file are
impossible to set on a workflow "run" mode.
The value of the column stay at "column 1" or void even if your tabular
file has more than one column.
The setting of the to
Dear all,
I work on many RADSeq projects, and I'm using Stacks for doing this. I
developpe(d) some scripts to describe the result, compute descriptive
statistics
So I'm really interested to participate to this Hackathon, to give autonomy
to biologist.
So I'm in to but not at the date
Hi,
I am looking for a simple task scheduler to use with Galaxy and
initially picked Torque, but since my server is a single box, Torque
would appear to be overkill?
Can I have any input from anyone who may have used it?
Thanks for any response
Hi Shane,
would Slurm work for you?
http://slurm.schedmd.com/
Cheers,
Bjoern
Am 24.11.2015 um 13:12 schrieb Shane Kelly:
> Hi,
> I am looking for a simple task scheduler to use with Galaxy and
> initially picked Torque, but since my server is a single box, Torque
> would appear to be over
I'd also recommend HTCondor.
Very easy to set up on debian/ubuntu, apt-get has a quick questionnaire that
gets you up and running.
Cheers,
Eric
On 11/24/2015 11:46 AM, Björn Grüning wrote:
> Hi Shane,
>
> would Slurm work for you?
>
> http://slurm.schedmd.com/
>
> Cheers,
> Bjoern
>
> Am 24.11.2
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 10:38:05 +0100
mabernard wrote:
> So I'm in to but not at the date you propose sorry.
> Is the possible the week before (between 7th and 11th) or 2 weeks
> later (between 29th to 1st)?
What about the 7th and 8th (March)?
Is this OK for everybody?
Thanks,
Tiago
__
Am 24.11.2015 um 20:36 schrieb Tiago Antao:
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 10:38:05 +0100
> mabernard wrote:
>
>> So I'm in to but not at the date you propose sorry.
>> Is the possible the week before (between 7th and 11th) or 2 weeks
>> later (between 29th to 1st)?
>
> What about the 7th and
> What about a github issue and a doodle link?
I want to contact a couple of people before the github issue. That will
be ready tomorrow.
WRT doodle, a question: do you folks think 2 days is the correct
duration? I do not have an opinion myself, but is that a sensible
default (as the metagenomics
Am 24.11.2015 um 21:02 schrieb Tiago Antao:
>> What about a github issue and a doodle link?
>
> I want to contact a couple of people before the github issue. That will
> be ready tomorrow.
>
> WRT doodle, a question: do you folks think 2 days is the correct
> duration? I do not have an opinion
Hi,
I have created a doodle pool for the Hackathon:
http://doodle.com/poll/hcc83a4yzgnecq4w
It spawns 2-days across the month of March (Starting on Mondays or
Thrusdays).
It has the If-Need-Be option.
A note (probably to Yvan and maybe others): Note that this doodle is
only going out to people
12 matches
Mail list logo
