Hi all - Our organization requires us to use a specific AMI (with a
specific flavor of linux) that isn't supported by Cloudman.  Its taking us
a bit of time to get this combination working.

Its taken more than 3 weeks and we still don't have Galaxy /  Cloudman
running.  I could probably do the same thing with StarCluster and be up and
running within a day.

I'm very comfortable with using StarCluster and am wondering if there is
any benefit to using Cloudman over StarCluster for node management with
Galaxy.

Thoughts?
___________________________________________________________
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
  https://lists.galaxyproject.org/

To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at:
  http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/

Reply via email to