Hi all - Our organization requires us to use a specific AMI (with a specific flavor of linux) that isn't supported by Cloudman. Its taking us a bit of time to get this combination working.
Its taken more than 3 weeks and we still don't have Galaxy / Cloudman running. I could probably do the same thing with StarCluster and be up and running within a day. I'm very comfortable with using StarCluster and am wondering if there is any benefit to using Cloudman over StarCluster for node management with Galaxy. Thoughts?
___________________________________________________________ Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all" in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: https://lists.galaxyproject.org/ To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at: http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/