Nice, this works! Maybe after some testing we can try to get the package in
the central maven repositories.
I think for now all the functionality I need is in your version of blend4j.
But if I think of something new I'll try to participate.
Thanks
On 13 July 2013 08:58, John Chilton wrote:
>
Hi Dan,
Thanks for your reply.
I don't handle the updates, but it was updated on 25 Jun 13. I'm pretty
sure I can rule out the version number as the BWA builds, created using
the Data Manager, work fine.
Here is the pertinent contents of shed_tool_data_table_conf.xml
value, dbkey, name
Hello list,
I'm currently trying to create a new tool, which has an .xhtml file as
its output.
After finishing the job, I would like to be able to click on the "eye
icon" aka "Display data in browser"
and display the resulting .xhtml file in the frame to the left of my
tool history. Unfortunate
Thanks for getting back to me, Enis.
I went ahead and started a new cluster instance. I'll try to leave it
running today in case there's anything we want to check.
Here's my whole process:
Start Screen Setup:
--
http://snag.gy/DMIeC.jpg
Entering my share string:
Hi All,
Week 4 blog post :
http://galaxy-gsoc2013.blogspot.com/2013/07/week-4-accomplishments-and-week-5-plans.html
Do drop in your comments , if any.
Thanks
Saket
___
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail
On Jun 28, 2013, at 12:35 PM, Nicholas Kline wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Our lab recently installed a local version of Galaxy on a mid-2012 Mac
> Pro computer. We can access the Galaxy server and sign in as an
> administrator. Today we tried creating a Data Library, adding a
> dataset to it, and uploading a
Hi Zain,
The minimum requirements for Galaxy are pretty much any recent model
computer. A basic install will load and run within a very short amount
of time, following the instructions at:
http://getgalaxy.org
Advanced tools come from the Tool Shed. These are installed separately.
No program
On Jul 1, 2013, at 3:48 AM, Rafael Hernández wrote:
> Hi Galaxy devs,
>
> I've installed Galaxy in local and I see that in spite of the users remove
> their histories using the "Delete history" option, the used space is not free.
>
> As I understand reading the Galaxy documentation, after delet
On Jul 8, 2013, at 3:50 PM, Mohammad Heydarian wrote:
> Hi,
> I am having trouble setting up a FTP connection with the recently released
> version of Galaxy Cloudman (ami-118bfc78).
>
> I have instantiated the new version of Galaxy Cloudman with CloudLaunch and
> also through the AWS EC2 wizar
Hi All
I'm trying to format one of the three outputs of my galaxy tool as plain text.
Thus far no matter how I specify my output format in the tool xml file I have
the same problem. When I click the eye icon it opens a save dialog rather that
displaying the text output in the central frame.
After some work i've created an Upstart script which can manage a load
balanced galaxy configuration as described in the wiki. I thought that I
would put it on this list for other people to use. The script parses
universe_wsgi.ini just like run.sh and spawns all of the servers it finds.
It comes in
Fantastic. blend4j definitely should be in a public repository, just don't
know how and have not had the time. Any help in that process would be most
welcome.
-John
On Jul 15, 2013 10:43 AM, "Eric Kuyt" wrote:
> Nice, this works! Maybe after some testing we can try to get the package
> in the ce
Hey Nate,
Thanks for the response and instructions.
I understand the last three steps of your protocol, but the first step is
difficult for me to understand. I'm guessing that, "1. Set 'use_pbkdf2 =
False' in universe_wsgi.ini anywhere in the [app:main] section", is telling
me to change a setting
One of my goals for the GCC was to sell the idea that tool shed
repositories need to be installable without a database present. I
talked with James Taylor and Enis Afgan about this idea briefly and they seemed
to believe this was a good idea - I kept meaning to discuss it with Greg but I
never go
> This would be different from using the API scripts because there would be
> no
> API, Galaxy instance, or Galaxy database involved - just the Galaxy code.
> If
> this was able to split into its own Python library, one could imagine even
> allowing something like tsmodule to be installable right f
Hi John,
It's really too bad that we didn't find time to discuss this in person at the
GCC. Until now, I've not heard from anyone that installation from the tool
shed without requiring a Galaxy database is important, so I'm lacking some
context on this (I assume your statement "without a datab
16 matches
Mail list logo