Peter Cock wrote: > > Which version of BLAST do you have? > > If you're using the "megablast" tool in Galaxy, then it will be NCBI > "legacy" BLAST using the blastall binary. > > If you're using the (commented out by default) BLAST+ wrappers, then > it will be using the blastn binary. There were changes to the ID > handling in the tabular output in BLAST 2.2.25+ as I recall.
Peter, Minor point unrelated to Douglas' original question - the BLAST+ tools are no longer commented in the sample tool config. --nate > > Another important factor is how the BLAST database was made (with or > without the -parse_seqids flag). > > Peter > > P.S. Questions like this about local installs might be better on the > galaxy-dev list, CC'd. > > ___________________________________________________________ > Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all" > in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this > and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: > > http://lists.bx.psu.edu/ > ___________________________________________________________ Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all" in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/
