Re: [galaxy-dev] [galaxy-user] operating on, and getting at, large files in galaxy...
Hi Nick,
If you're running your own local instance, then nothing is impossible - it's
just a bit ugly...
Nate Coraor wrote, On 02/21/2011 12:36 PM:
>> [...] many tools that operate on these files produces multiple,
>> uncompressed large files which quickly eat up the disk allocation.
>> [...] With no way to compress or archive files produced by
>> intermediate steps in a workflow, [...]
Here's a tool that compresses an input galaxy dataset and then deletes the
input file.
Deleting the input dataset from underneath galaxy's feet obviously goes against
everything galaxy stands for,
and I'm sure the Galaxy team does not endorse such solutions. It will also
slightly make your database out-of-sync with the real files on the disk.
But hey - desperate times call for desperate means :)
for advanced users only!
gzip -c '$input' > '$output' && rm '$input'
**What it does**
DO NOT USE THIS TOOL UNLESS YOU KNOW WHAT YOU'RE DOING.
The second "input" parameter in this tool is there only to force this tool to
run after another tool (which needs the uncompressed input file) -
you should connect this tool carefully in your workflow.
Making the output format "gzip" ensures the new compressed files can't be used
with any regular tool.
Then create a similar "uncompress" tool that does the opposite.
>> And this brings me to the second problem. Getting large files out
>> of Galaxy. The only way to save large files from Galaxy (that I can
>> see) is the save icon, which downloads the file via http. This take
>> *ages* for a large file and also causes big headaches for my
>> firefox browser.
Here are three solutions (in varying level of ugliness) to get files out of
galaxy:
1. This simple tool will tell you the full path of your dataset:
=
for advanced users only!
readlink -f '$input' > '$output'
**What it does**
DO NOT USE THIS TOOL UNLESS YOU KNOW WHAT YOU'RE DOING.
=
run it on any input dataset, the output will contain the full path on your
local system.
It goes without saying that this is a security hazard, and only use this tool
if you know what you're doing, and you trust your users.
Once you have the full path, just access the file directly out of galaxy.
2. The following tool allows the user to export a dataset into a hard-coded
directory (/tmp/galaxy_export in this example).
This is just a proof of concept, and for a production environment you'll need
to add validators to the "description" variable to prevent users from adding
unwanted characters.
But it works - once the tool is run, the selected dataset will appear under
/tmp/galaxy_export/$USER/ .
=
for advanced users only!
mkdir -p /tmp/galaxy_export/$userEmail &&
ln -s '$input'
'/tmp/galaxy_export/$userEmail/${input.hid}_${description}.${input.extension}'
**What it does**
DO NOT USE THIS TOOL UNLESS YOU KNOW WHAT YOU'RE DOING.
3. Last but not least, if you have access to the database, getting the dataset
path is easy if you now the dataset number or the dataset hash-id (and you have
them as links on the galaxy web page). This solution is not for the faint of
heart, but if you want I show examples of how to get from one to the other.
-gordon
___
To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the
interface at:
http://lists.bx.psu.edu/
Re: [galaxy-dev] [galaxy-user] operating on, and getting at, large files in galaxy...
Nick Schurch wrote: > Hi all, > > I've recently encountered a few problems when trying to use Galaxy which are > really driving me away from using it as a bioinformatics platform for NGS. I > was wonderinf if there are any simple solutions that I've missed... Hi Nick, We've had some internal discussion and proposed some solutions which would hopefully make Galaxy more useful for your environment. > Firstly, It seems that while there are a few solutions for getting large > files (a few GB) into a local install of galaxy without going through HTTP, > many tools that operate on these files produces multiple, uncompressed large > files which quickly eat up the disk allocation. This is particularly > significant in a workflow that has multiple processing steps which each > leave behind a large file. With no way to compress or archive files produced > by intermediate steps in a workflow, and no desire to delete them since I > may need to go back to them and they can take hours to re-run, the only two > remaining options seem to be to save them and then delete them. We've dealt with this locally by implementing compression in the underlying filesystem (ZFS), but this requires a fileserver that runs Solaris (or a derivative) or FreeBSD. Btrfs also supports compression but I would be a bit more wary of losing my data with btrfs since it is less mature and can't recover corrupted filesystems. Fusecompress would also be an option. We would strongly recommend performing regular backups regardless of any filesystem-level choice. Unfortunately this is a tricky problem to solve within Galaxy itself. While some tools can operate on compressed files directly, many cannot and so compressing all outputs could prove to be very CPU intensive and a waste of time if the next step will have to decompress the file. There has been some discussion of how to implement transparent compression and other complex underlying data management directly in Galaxy, but any work on it is not likely to commence soon. > And this brings me to the second problem. Getting large files out of Galaxy. > The only way to save large files from Galaxy (that I can see) is the save > icon, which downloads the file via http. This take *ages* for a large file > and also causes big headaches for my firefox browser. I've taken a quick > peek at the Galaxy file system to see if I could just copy a file, but its > almost completely indecipherable if you want to find out what file in the > file system corresponds to a file saved from a tool. Is there some way to > get the location of a particular file on the galaxy file system, that I can > just copy? This is certainly something we can implement and will be working on fairly soon. There have been quite a few requests to integrate more tightly with environments where Galaxy users exist as system users. There's an issue in our tracker which you can follow here: https://bitbucket.org/galaxy/galaxy-central/issue/106/ --nate > > -- > Cheers, > > Nick Schurch > > Data Analysis Group (The Barton Group), > School of Life Sciences, > University of Dundee, > Dow St, > Dundee, > DD1 5EH, > Scotland, > UK > > Tel: +44 1382 388707 > Fax: +44 1382 345 893 > > > > -- > Cheers, > > Nick Schurch > > Data Analysis Group (The Barton Group), > School of Life Sciences, > University of Dundee, > Dow St, > Dundee, > DD1 5EH, > Scotland, > UK > > Tel: +44 1382 388707 > Fax: +44 1382 345 893 > ___ > galaxy-user mailing list > galaxy-u...@lists.bx.psu.edu > http://lists.bx.psu.edu/listinfo/galaxy-user ___ To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/
Re: [galaxy-dev] [galaxy-user] operating on, and getting at, large files in galaxy...
Hi Nick, Yes, these nextgen reads files are huge and getting bigger every quarter! But there will be storage issues nomatter whether you use Galaxy or not. In fact, i think users are more likely to cleanup files and histories in galaxy than they are to cleanup NFS folders -- out of sight, out of mind! Firstly, I think unnecessary intermediate files are more of a problem than whether or not the file is compressed or not. Indeed, just transferring these files back and forth from the cluster takes a while, not to mention the delay in waiting to be rescheduled for each step. And so I created a tool which would do the job of fastq groomer, end-trimmer, process pairs, and a few other simple tasks -- all in one shot. I haven't uploaded it to the toolshed yet but I will. I hate to duplicate existing tools, but i have a lot of seq data. I will also create a fastqilluminabz2 datatype as well and include it with the tool. For getting files into galaxy, I created a simple tool which would allow staff to enter NFS paths and the option to either copy or symlink if the location was considered stable. I allowed only certain folders (e.g. /home, /storage) and added a password, for security. Similarly, for getting a file out, all you need is a dinky tool for users to provide a destination path. since i've got galaxy running as a special galaxy user in a special galaxy group, file access is restricted (as it should be), so i tell users to create a dropbox folder in their homedir (and chmod 777). by creating a tool like this, you don't need to care how galaxy names the files. i deliberately try to not mess around under the hood. i can upload these to galaxy toolshed, but like i said, there isn't much to them. Ed On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Nick Schurch wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've recently encountered a few problems when trying to use Galaxy which > are really driving me away from using it as a bioinformatics platform for > NGS. I was wonderinf if there are any simple solutions that I've missed... > > Firstly, It seems that while there are a few solutions for getting large > files (a few GB) into a local install of galaxy without going through HTTP, > many tools that operate on these files produces multiple, uncompressed large > files which quickly eat up the disk allocation. This is particularly > significant in a workflow that has multiple processing steps which each > leave behind a large file. With no way to compress or archive files produced > by intermediate steps in a workflow, and no desire to delete them since I > may need to go back to them and they can take hours to re-run, the only two > remaining options seem to be to save them and then delete them. > > And this brings me to the second problem. Getting large files out of > Galaxy. The only way to save large files from Galaxy (that I can see) is the > save icon, which downloads the file via http. This take *ages* for a large > file and also causes big headaches for my firefox browser. I've taken a > quick peek at the Galaxy file system to see if I could just copy a file, but > its almost completely indecipherable if you want to find out what file in > the file system corresponds to a file saved from a tool. Is there some way > to get the location of a particular file on the galaxy file system, that I > can just copy? > > -- > Cheers, > > Nick Schurch > > Data Analysis Group (The Barton Group), > School of Life Sciences, > University of Dundee, > Dow St, > Dundee, > DD1 5EH, > Scotland, > UK > > Tel: +44 1382 388707 > Fax: +44 1382 345 893 > > > > -- > Cheers, > > Nick Schurch > > Data Analysis Group (The Barton Group), > School of Life Sciences, > University of Dundee, > Dow St, > Dundee, > DD1 5EH, > Scotland, > UK > > Tel: +44 1382 388707 > Fax: +44 1382 345 893 > > ___ > galaxy-user mailing list > galaxy-u...@lists.bx.psu.edu > http://lists.bx.psu.edu/listinfo/galaxy-user > > ___ To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/
