Hi Nate, Has there been any progress on this? This enhancement would actually be very useful for our local Galaxy instance.
Cheers, Tony -----Original Message----- From: galaxy-dev-boun...@lists.bx.psu.edu [mailto:galaxy-dev-boun...@lists.bx.psu.edu] On Behalf Of Nate Coraor Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 10:56 AM To: John Chilton Cc: galaxy-dev@lists.bx.psu.edu Subject: Re: [galaxy-dev] Defining Job Runners Dynamically Hey John, This hasn't been forgotten. I appreciate the code submission, and will review it as soon as possible. I also created a relevant issue in Bitbucket: https://bitbucket.org/galaxy/galaxy-central/issue/709/add-more-control-over-where-jobs-run --nate On Oct 15, 2011, at 10:42 PM, John Chilton wrote: > Hello All, > > I just issued a pull request that augments Galaxy to allow defining job > runners dynamically at runtime > (https://bitbucket.org/galaxy/galaxy-central/pull-request/12/dynamic-job-runners). > Whether it makes the cut or not, I thought I would describe enhancements > here in case anyone else would find it useful. > > There a couple use cases we hope this will help us address for our > institution - one is dynamically switching queues based on user (we have a > very nice shared memory resource that can only be used by researchers with > NIH funding) and the other is inspecting input sizes to give more accurate > max walltimes to pbs (a small number of cufflinks jobs for instance take over > three days on our cluster but defining max walltimes in excess of that for > all jobs could result in our queue sitting idle around our monthly > downtimes). You might also imagine using this to dynamically switch queues > entirely based on input sizes or parameters, or alter queue priorities based > on the submitting user or input sizes/parameters. > > There are two steps to use this - you must add a line in universe.ini and > define a function to compute the true job runner string in the new file > lib/galaxy/jobs/rules.py. > > This first step is similar to what you would do to statically assign a tool > to a particular job runner. If you would like to dynamically assign a job > runner for cufflinks you would start by adding a line like one of the > following to universe.ini > > cufflinks = dynamic:///python > -or- > cufflinks = dynamic:///python/compute_runner > > If you use the first form, a function called cufflinks must be defined in > rules.py, adding the extra argument after python/ lets you specify a > particular function by name (compute_runner in this example). This second > option could let you assign job runners with the same function for multiple > tools. > > The only other step is to define a python function in rules.py that produces > a string corresponding to a valid job runner such as "local:///" or > "pbs:///queue/-l walltime=48:00:00/". > > If the functions defined in this file take in arguments, these arguments > should have names from the follow list: job_wrapper, user_email, app, job, > tool, tool_id, job_id, user. The plumbing will map these arguments to the > implied galaxy object. For instance, job_wrapper is the JobWrapper instance > for the job that gets passed to the job runner, user_email is the user's > email address or None, app is the main application configuration object used > throughout the code base that can be used for instance to get values defined > in universe.ini, job, tool, and user are model objects, and job_id and > tool_id the relevant ids. > > If you are writing a function that routes a certain list of users to a > particular queue or increases their priority, you will probably only need to > take in one argument - user_email. However, if you are going to look at input > file sizes you may want to take in an argument called job and use the > following piece of code to find the input size for input named "input1" in > the tool xml. > > inp_data = dict( [ ( da.name, da.dataset ) for da in job.input_datasets ] > ) > inp_data.update( [ ( da.name, da.dataset ) for da in > job.input_library_datasets ] ) > input1_file = inp_data[ "input1" ].file_name > input1_size = os.path.getsize( input1_file ) > > This whole concept works for a couple of small tests on my local machine, but > there are certain aspects of the job runner code that makes me feel there may > be corner cases I am not seeing where this approach may not work - so your > millage may vary. > > -John > > ------------------------------------------------ > John Chilton > Software Developer > University of Minnesota Supercomputing Institute > Office: 612-625-0917 > Cell: 612-226-9223 > E-Mail: chil...@msi.umn.edu > ___________________________________________________________ > Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all" > in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this > and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: > > http://lists.bx.psu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________ Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all" in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________ Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all" in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/
