Re: [galaxy-dev] Problem referencing EMBOSS tools in universe_wsgi.ini

2013-02-06 Thread Guest, Simon
> Hi Simon,
> 
> Significant changes to the way that job run parameters are defined will be
> included in a future release.  In specific, there'll be no more job runner
> URLs, and parameters will be specified with a more robust XML language.
> These changes aren't stable enough to go out in the next release
> (scheduled for the end of this week), but they should be in the one after
> that.
> 
> --nate

Hi Nate,

Thanks for that.  We look forward to that release!

cheers,
Simon
-- 


===
Attention: The information contained in this message and/or attachments
from AgResearch Limited is intended only for the persons or entities
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipients is prohibited by AgResearch
Limited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the
sender immediately.
===

___
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:

  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/


Re: [galaxy-dev] Problem referencing EMBOSS tools in universe_wsgi.ini

2013-02-05 Thread Nate Coraor
On Jan 29, 2013, at 3:59 PM, Guest, Simon wrote:

> We have set up our local Galaxy installation to submit jobs by default 
> through HTCondor, using the drmaa tool runner.  We override this on a 
> tool-by-tool basis in universe_wsgi.ini, to specify certain tools we always 
> want to run locally.
>  
> The problem is that EMBOSS tools have a tool id like ‘emboss: infoseq46’, and 
> it’s not possible to reference a tool with an id containing a colon in the 
> universe_wsgi.ini file (because colon is the character which separates a 
> configuration item name from its value).
>  
> It seems to me there are two possible solutions:
> 1. Implement some form of escape character processing in the config file 
> parser (on top of Python’s ConfigParser) so we can write tool ids in that 
> file like ‘emboss%3a infoseq46’
> 2. Change all the EMBOSS tools to have ids like ‘emboss-infoseq46’ rather 
> than using a colon and space.
>  
> For now, we are modifying our XML files locally (with a script) to do 2.
>  
> Are there any comments from Galaxy developers on which of these solutions 
> they prefer, or any reason why (2) shouldn’t be incorporated in the Galaxy 
> mainline?

Hi Simon,

Significant changes to the way that job run parameters are defined will be 
included in a future release.  In specific, there'll be no more job runner 
URLs, and parameters will be specified with a more robust XML language.  These 
changes aren't stable enough to go out in the next release (scheduled for the 
end of this week), but they should be in the one after that.

--nate

>  
> cheers,
> Simon
>  
> 
> ===
> Attention: The information contained in this message and/or attachments
> from AgResearch Limited is intended only for the persons or entities
> to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
> taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
> entities other than the intended recipients is prohibited by AgResearch
> Limited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the
> sender immediately.
> ===
> ___
> Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
> in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
> and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
> 
>  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/


___
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:

  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/