On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:50 PM, John-Paul Robinson wrote:
> Thanks for proposing a patch.
>
> We're looking at trying it out on our code base but are at least a few
> revisions behind and may need to do a little back porting (or catching up).
I think it has been a while since this stuff has been
Thanks for proposing a patch.
We're looking at trying it out on our code base but are at least a few
revisions behind and may need to do a little back porting (or catching up).
Let me make sure I understand the intention of the patch, though.
>From the code changes, I trust that the intention i
Hello All,
Thanks for the well laid out e-mails and great discussion. I think
John-Paul's comment about the code growing up organically is probably
exactly right. (A link below has some details from Nate about this).
So late last night I opened a sprawling pull request that cleaned up
a lot o
We've considered the sudo solution, but it opens the window to other
bugs giving galaxy the power to change ownership of other files in our
shared user cluster environment. We could isolate the power to a script
but then we still need to monitor this code closely. We'd prefer not to
introduce tha
bx.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [galaxy-dev] inconsistent use of tempfile.mkstemp during upload
causes problems
Hi JPR,
I had the same questions while trying to figure out a fool-proof way to allow
users to import files into galaxy on our Cluster. I couldn't exactly figure
out, nor did I have the
Hi JPR,
I had the same questions while trying to figure out a fool-proof way to allow
users to import files into galaxy on our Cluster. I couldn't exactly figure
out, nor did I have the time to really review, why the galaxy code did these
steps and why that shutil.move failed. I opted to simp
