[galaxy-user] Problem with workflow step ordering

2013-03-15 Thread Ian Donaldson
When i create a GALAXY workflow the order of the steps in the summary are fine 
until the main pipeline diverges into multiple branches. Then the steps from 
the different branches get shuffled in the summary and it is difficult to see 
what is going on.


Q. Is it possible to manually reorder steps in a GALAXY workflow summary?


There used to a problem where workflows with multiple inputs would randomise 
the order of the inputs each time the workflow was run. Now the proximity of 
the inputs to the top left-hand edge of the workflow dictates the precedence.

Also, if i manually run the steps one at a time in order in a history and 
create a workflow from that, in the creation summary (just before making the 
workflow) everything is in order, however when the workflow is run the order 
has been messed up.

Thanks,
Ian

___
The Galaxy User list should be used for the discussion of
Galaxy analysis and other features on the public server
at usegalaxy.org.  Please keep all replies on the list by
using reply all in your mail client.  For discussion of
local Galaxy instances and the Galaxy source code, please
use the Galaxy Development list:

  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/listinfo/galaxy-dev

To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists,
please use the interface at:

  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/

Re: [galaxy-user] Cuffdiff statistical calculations are inconsistent?

2013-03-15 Thread Jeremy Goecks
 The header of the Cuffdiff tool page says it is version 0.0.5

This version is the Galaxy tool wrapper version, not the tool version. (Yes, 
this is a usability issue.) You can find the tool version in the dataset's 
information panel by clicking on the 'i' icon.

 Is there a way, or setting, on Cuffdiff 2.0 to revert the parameters to be 
 more similar to Cuffdiff 1.3?

This isn't a parameter issue. The Cuffdiff algorithm has changed substantially, 
and it's not clear to me if/how (or whether it's a good idea at all) to modify 
parameters to obtain 1.3-esque results. 

Best,
J.
___
The Galaxy User list should be used for the discussion of
Galaxy analysis and other features on the public server
at usegalaxy.org.  Please keep all replies on the list by
using reply all in your mail client.  For discussion of
local Galaxy instances and the Galaxy source code, please
use the Galaxy Development list:

  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/listinfo/galaxy-dev

To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists,
please use the interface at:

  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/