Re: [galaxy-user] How should I include biological replicates in cufflink/cuffdiff?

2013-03-08 Thread Jeremy Goecks
 
 I am dealing with a bacterium which has about 4000 genes. When I tried 
 Cuffmerge to merge everything with reference annotation, I got a merged file 
 of only 50 lines. If I left out the reference annotation file, Cuffmerge 
 returned me a merged file of 4000 lines (which is more reasonable).
 
 However this difference didn't happen if I use Cuffcompare to merge all the 
 files. With or Without reference annotation, the merged file are both of 4000 
 lines. If I continue to Cuffdiff with this Cuffcompare file, I got over 1000 
 significantly changed genes.
 
 Could you give me some suggestion on this? Should I just trust the 
 Cuffcompare file? 

Cuffmerge attempts to remove incomplete or spurious transcripts. My best guess 
is bacterial transcripts, with few/no introns, are being filtered out because 
they appear to be incomplete to Cuffmerge. So, in your case, Cuffcompare could 
be the superior option. 

You might want to verify my guess by discussing the issue with the cufflinks 
developers directly: tophat.cuffli...@gmail.com ; please feel free to post 
anything you learn to this list.

Best,
J.


___
The Galaxy User list should be used for the discussion of
Galaxy analysis and other features on the public server
at usegalaxy.org.  Please keep all replies on the list by
using reply all in your mail client.  For discussion of
local Galaxy instances and the Galaxy source code, please
use the Galaxy Development list:

  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/listinfo/galaxy-dev

To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists,
please use the interface at:

  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/


Re: [galaxy-user] How should I include biological replicates in cufflink/cuffdiff?

2013-03-04 Thread Qian Dong
Dear Jeremy,

Thank you for your advice!

However when I tried this out I got some more questions.

I am dealing with a bacterium which has about 4000 genes. When I tried
Cuffmerge to merge everything with reference annotation, I got a merged
file of only 50 lines. If I left out the reference annotation file,
Cuffmerge returned me a merged file of 4000 lines (which is more
reasonable).

However this difference didn't happen if I use Cuffcompare to merge all the
files. With or Without reference annotation, the merged file are both of
4000 lines. If I continue to Cuffdiff with this Cuffcompare file, I got
over 1000 significantly changed genes.

Could you give me some suggestion on this? Should I just trust the
Cuffcompare file?

Is it possible that there might be some problem with my reference
annotation file?

Thank you very much,

Qian



On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Jeremy Goecks jeremy.goe...@emory.eduwrote:

  My question is, if I need to compare between 5 time points, should I do
 comparison pairwise?

 No, do them all at once with Cuffdiff:

 (a) set 'Perform Replicate Analysis' to 'Yes';
 (b) create 5 replicate conditions, one for each time point;
 (c) add your replicates for each time point.

 There's a Cuffdiff flag to do time series analysis, but it isn't
 implemented yet in Galaxy, so you'll get pairwise comparisons for all
 conditions. You can use the filtering tool to reduce Cuffdiff outputs to
 only the timepoint comparisons.


  I will use cuffmerge to merge 0hour-1, 0hour-2, 0hour-3,
 1hour-1,1hour-2.1hour-3 to generate one cuffmerge file.

 Correct.

  Then I will run cuffdiff using the merged file, include two groups,
 group 1 is 0 hour (add 0hour 1-3 in group 1) and group 2 is 1hour (add
 1hour1-3 in group 2).

 Use the process I described above to do all pairwise comparisons in one
 run.

 Good luck,
 J.





-- 
Qian Dong
Bauer Lab, MCBD
Simon Hall: 313-317
212 S. Hawthorne Dr.
Bloomington, IN 47405
Email:do...@indiana.edu
Lab Phone:812-855-8443
___
The Galaxy User list should be used for the discussion of
Galaxy analysis and other features on the public server
at usegalaxy.org.  Please keep all replies on the list by
using reply all in your mail client.  For discussion of
local Galaxy instances and the Galaxy source code, please
use the Galaxy Development list:

  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/listinfo/galaxy-dev

To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists,
please use the interface at:

  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/

Re: [galaxy-user] How should I include biological replicates in cufflink/cuffdiff?

2013-03-03 Thread Jeremy Goecks
 My question is, if I need to compare between 5 time points, should I do 
 comparison pairwise?

No, do them all at once with Cuffdiff: 

(a) set 'Perform Replicate Analysis' to 'Yes';
(b) create 5 replicate conditions, one for each time point;
(c) add your replicates for each time point. 

There's a Cuffdiff flag to do time series analysis, but it isn't implemented 
yet in Galaxy, so you'll get pairwise comparisons for all conditions. You can 
use the filtering tool to reduce Cuffdiff outputs to only the timepoint 
comparisons.


 I will use cuffmerge to merge 0hour-1, 0hour-2, 0hour-3, 
 1hour-1,1hour-2.1hour-3 to generate one cuffmerge file.

Correct.

 Then I will run cuffdiff using the merged file, include two groups, group 1 
 is 0 hour (add 0hour 1-3 in group 1) and group 2 is 1hour (add 1hour1-3 in 
 group 2).

Use the process I described above to do all pairwise comparisons in one run.

Good luck,
J.



___
The Galaxy User list should be used for the discussion of
Galaxy analysis and other features on the public server
at usegalaxy.org.  Please keep all replies on the list by
using reply all in your mail client.  For discussion of
local Galaxy instances and the Galaxy source code, please
use the Galaxy Development list:

  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/listinfo/galaxy-dev

To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists,
please use the interface at:

  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/