Re: [galaxy-user] ILLumina 1.9 Hiseq

2012-02-29 Thread Jennifer Jackson

Hello,

The input quality score type should be set as Sanger for your data.

Thanks!

Jen
Galaxy team

On 2/29/12 7:39 AM, Ateequr Rehman wrote:

Dear Glaxy users and admin

I ran my sequence data on FASTQC tool,
output says it is
Encoding Sanger / Illumina 1.9

now i want to groom my file, but groomer does not have option for 1.9 in
Input FASTQ quality scores type

any idea which option i should select to grroom my file,

later i want to run Bowtie or Tophat,

Thanks
**



___
The Galaxy User list should be used for the discussion of
Galaxy analysis and other features on the public server
at usegalaxy.org.  Please keep all replies on the list by
using reply all in your mail client.  For discussion of
local Galaxy instances and the Galaxy source code, please
use the Galaxy Development list:

   http://lists.bx.psu.edu/listinfo/galaxy-dev

To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists,
please use the interface at:

   http://lists.bx.psu.edu/


--
Jennifer Jackson
http://usegalaxy.org
http://galaxyproject.org/wiki/Support
___
The Galaxy User list should be used for the discussion of
Galaxy analysis and other features on the public server
at usegalaxy.org.  Please keep all replies on the list by
using reply all in your mail client.  For discussion of
local Galaxy instances and the Galaxy source code, please
use the Galaxy Development list:

 http://lists.bx.psu.edu/listinfo/galaxy-dev

To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists,
please use the interface at:

 http://lists.bx.psu.edu/


Re: [galaxy-user] ILLumina 1.9 Hiseq

2012-02-29 Thread Carlos Borroto
Hi Jen,

I have a related question. If Illumina 1.9 is already in Sanger
format, is it still necessary to groom the FASTQ files for TopHat?
Would it be enough to directly change the data type to Sanger without
grooming?

Thanks,
Carlos

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Jennifer Jackson j...@bx.psu.edu wrote:
 Hello,

 The input quality score type should be set as Sanger for your data.

 Thanks!

 Jen
 Galaxy team


 On 2/29/12 7:39 AM, Ateequr Rehman wrote:

 Dear Glaxy users and admin

 I ran my sequence data on FASTQC tool,
 output says it is
 Encoding Sanger / Illumina 1.9

 now i want to groom my file, but groomer does not have option for 1.9 in
 Input FASTQ quality scores type

 any idea which option i should select to grroom my file,

 later i want to run Bowtie or Tophat,

 Thanks
 **



 ___
 The Galaxy User list should be used for the discussion of
 Galaxy analysis and other features on the public server
 at usegalaxy.org.  Please keep all replies on the list by
 using reply all in your mail client.  For discussion of
 local Galaxy instances and the Galaxy source code, please
 use the Galaxy Development list:

   http://lists.bx.psu.edu/listinfo/galaxy-dev

 To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists,
 please use the interface at:

   http://lists.bx.psu.edu/


 --
 Jennifer Jackson
 http://usegalaxy.org
 http://galaxyproject.org/wiki/Support
 ___
 The Galaxy User list should be used for the discussion of
 Galaxy analysis and other features on the public server
 at usegalaxy.org.  Please keep all replies on the list by
 using reply all in your mail client.  For discussion of
 local Galaxy instances and the Galaxy source code, please
 use the Galaxy Development list:

  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/listinfo/galaxy-dev

 To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists,
 please use the interface at:

  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/

___
The Galaxy User list should be used for the discussion of
Galaxy analysis and other features on the public server
at usegalaxy.org.  Please keep all replies on the list by
using reply all in your mail client.  For discussion of
local Galaxy instances and the Galaxy source code, please
use the Galaxy Development list:

  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/listinfo/galaxy-dev

To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists,
please use the interface at:

  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/

Re: [galaxy-user] ILLumina 1.9 Hiseq

2012-02-29 Thread Jennifer Jackson

Hi Rich,

Tools will allow grooming to be skipped if the data is already in 
fastqsanger or fastqcssanger format (as appropriate). This can be set at 
upload or on the Edit Attributes form (pencil icon). For Illumina, 
these would be data resulting from the CASAVA 1.8+ pipeline.


For Illumina 1.5, select Illumina 1.3-1.7 on the FASTQ Groomer tool 
form to properly format the data.


Thanks for bringing up a good topic! Not having to groom can save both 
time and disk space.


Best,

Jen
Galaxy team

On 2/29/12 8:24 AM, Richard Mark White wrote:

I have a question about the groomer. Do all Illumina runs need to be
groomed, or are there situations where it can be skipped?? (My data says
illumina 1.5, so ive been picking input type as illumina 1.3-1.5.)

rich



*From:* Jennifer Jackson j...@bx.psu.edu
*To:* Ateequr Rehman atee...@yahoo.com
*Cc:* galaxy-user@lists.bx.psu.edu galaxy-user@lists.bx.psu.edu
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 29, 2012 10:57 AM
*Subject:* Re: [galaxy-user] ILLumina 1.9 Hiseq

Hello,

The input quality score type should be set as Sanger for your data.

Thanks!

Jen
Galaxy team

On 2/29/12 7:39 AM, Ateequr Rehman wrote:
  Dear Glaxy users and admin
 
  I ran my sequence data on FASTQC tool,
  output says it is
  Encoding Sanger / Illumina 1.9
 
  now i want to groom my file, but groomer does not have option for 1.9 in
  Input FASTQ quality scores type
 
  any idea which option i should select to grroom my file,
 
  later i want to run Bowtie or Tophat,
 
  Thanks
  **
 
 
 
  ___
  The Galaxy User list should be used for the discussion of
  Galaxy analysis and other features on the public server
  at usegalaxy.org http://usegalaxy.org. Please keep all replies on
the list by
  using reply all in your mail client. For discussion of
  local Galaxy instances and the Galaxy source code, please
  use the Galaxy Development list:
 
  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/listinfo/galaxy-dev
 
  To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists,
  please use the interface at:
 
  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/

--
Jennifer Jackson
http://usegalaxy.org
http://galaxyproject.org/wiki/Support
___
The Galaxy User list should be used for the discussion of
Galaxy analysis and other features on the public server
at usegalaxy.org. Please keep all replies on the list by
using reply all in your mail client. For discussion of
local Galaxy instances and the Galaxy source code, please
use the Galaxy Development list:

http://lists.bx.psu.edu/listinfo/galaxy-dev

To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists,
please use the interface at:

http://lists.bx.psu.edu/




--
Jennifer Jackson
http://usegalaxy.org
http://galaxyproject.org/wiki/Support
___
The Galaxy User list should be used for the discussion of
Galaxy analysis and other features on the public server
at usegalaxy.org.  Please keep all replies on the list by
using reply all in your mail client.  For discussion of
local Galaxy instances and the Galaxy source code, please
use the Galaxy Development list:

 http://lists.bx.psu.edu/listinfo/galaxy-dev

To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists,
please use the interface at:

 http://lists.bx.psu.edu/