Benoît Minisini ha scritto:
Sorry, but the sources haven't got gb.qt4 but only gb.qt
Florent talks about compiling Gambas 2 from the *.tar.bz2 sources, whereas
Doriano talks about compiling Gambas 3 from the subversion repository!
Yes - sorry. I was so deep inside my problems
El 25/07/10 02:56, Fabien Bodard escribió:
lol it seem to be a joke ... intenet have no end...
2010/7/24 EA7DFH ea7...@ea7dfh.com:
Hey, what's up?
Surprised when testing Gambas 2.21... When I do open the
Project-Create-Installation Package menu, in the Website field there
is a
Benoît Minisini ha scritto:
Sorry, but the sources haven't got gb.qt4 but only gb.qt
Florent talks about compiling Gambas 2 from the *.tar.bz2 sources,
whereas Doriano talks about compiling Gambas 3 from the subversion
repository!
Yes - sorry. I was so deep inside my problems that
lol it seem to be a joke ... intenet have no end...
Mmm. Every project now will have this link by default!
--
Benoît Minisini
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G
Le 25 juillet 2010 12:59, Benoît Minisini
gam...@users.sourceforge.net a écrit :
lol it seem to be a joke ... intenet have no end...
Mmm. Every project now will have this link by default!
it's better than a 404 error page !
--
Benoît Minisini
Le dimanche 25 juillet 2010 14:15:13, Fabien Bodard a écrit :
Le 25 juillet 2010 12:59, Benoît Minisini
gam...@users.sourceforge.net a écrit :
lol it seem to be a joke ... intenet have no end...
Mmm. Every project now will have this link by default!
it's better than a 404 error page
Why store the source code in a hidden directory?
Why hide it open source? :-(
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first --
Why store the source code in a hidden directory?
Why hide it open source? :-(
The directory is not really hidden, its name just begins with a dot!
I did that because all non-hidden files and directories are considered data
files that must be stored in the final executable. Hidden
it's not because the directory is hidden that you are not allowed to
see and modify the sources... in fact in reallity the directory is not
hidden but have just a dot before the name , but by convention these
directory are considered like hidden by the files broswer. try to look
a gambas project
lool
2010/7/25 Fabien Bodard gambas...@gmail.com:
it's not because the directory is hidden that you are not allowed to
see and modify the sources... in fact in reallity the directory is not
hidden but have just a dot before the name , but by convention these
directory are considered like
j'ai honte de mon anglais !
2010/7/25 Fabien Bodard gambas...@gmail.com:
lool
2010/7/25 Fabien Bodard gambas...@gmail.com:
it's not because the directory is hidden that you are not allowed to
see and modify the sources... in fact in reallity the directory is not
hidden but have just a dot
What? Is there any other ways to hide file/folder in Linux?
Jussi
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 15:53, Fabien Bodard gambas...@gmail.com wrote:
it's not because the directory is hidden that you are not allowed to
see and modify the sources... in fact in reallity the directory is not
hidden but
no :)... since many years i've think there is another way ... but i
was in the false
2010/7/25 Jussi Lahtinen jussi.lahti...@gmail.com:
What? Is there any other ways to hide file/folder in Linux?
Jussi
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 15:53, Fabien Bodard gambas...@gmail.com wrote:
it's not
25.07.2010 16:47, Benoît Minisini пишет:
Why store the source code in a hidden directory?
Why hide it open source? :-(
The directory is not really hidden, its name just begins with a dot!
I did that because all non-hidden files and directories are considered data
files that must be
Benoît Minisini ha scritto:
Now, the single file that should be a link it's easy to correct. But, a
line saying link ../component.am in the middle of a makefile is
different: the makefile is generated by ./configure; where are the
instructions that make configure think to do such a thing?
Benoît Minisini ha scritto:
Now, the single file that should be a link it's easy to correct. But, a
line saying link ../component.am in the middle of a makefile is
different: the makefile is generated by ./configure; where are the
instructions that make configure think to do such a thing?
Benoît Minisini ha scritto:
Benoît Minisini ha scritto:
Me and others got caught in the same pit - building of gambas3.gambas
succeeds even if some required component is missing. While it is true
that examining logs or paying attention to the compilation process this
pit could be
I mean that gambas3.gambas should not be created, and therefore not
installed, if it is disabled, much the same as other components. Me and
the others who saw no project in... were fooled by this: if you
compile a thing, may be a C source or a Gambas source, the compilation
stops if the
Benoît Minisini ha scritto:
You just have to use the MEMORY instruction to get a memory stream, and
replace the #pointer by #memoryStream.
As you already stated, it is necessary to get informed. I will fetch the
wiki for that.
It seems that byref is ignored in external declaration,
19 matches
Mail list logo
