2017-03-15 3:18 GMT-04:00 Adrien Prokopowicz :
> Git doesn't actually manage users itself : for each commit, it only records
> a full name and an email, both of which are purely indicative.
>
that's right, so better right?
> Therefore, it is not a problem at all
Le Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:22:48 +0100, Benoît Minisini
a écrit:
> Le 13/03/2017 à 15:16, PICCORO McKAY Lenz a écrit :
>> i'm back for this land and in my firts 2017 mail to this i see some
>> notes
>> about sourgeforce
>>
>> 2017-02-25 20:37 GMT-04:00 Jesus Guardon
sorry i forget to adde too:
https://gitlab.com/help/workflow/importing/migrating_from_svn
i prefer svn2git and the user map link i shared before works with it!
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com
2017-03-13 11:15 GMT-04:00 PICCORO McKAY Lenz :
the history will not be missing at all!
CITED:
> Group members will get exported as project members, as long as the user
has
master or admin access to the group where the exported project lives. An
admin
in the import side is required to map the users, based on email or username.
Otherwise, a
Le 13/03/2017 à 15:16, PICCORO McKAY Lenz a écrit :
> i'm back for this land and in my firts 2017 mail to this i see some notes
> about sourgeforce
>
> 2017-02-25 20:37 GMT-04:00 Jesus Guardon :
>
>> El 25/2/17 a las 20:17, Benoît Minisini escribió:
>>> Moreover, the
i'm back for this land and in my firts 2017 mail to this i see some notes
about sourgeforce
2017-02-25 20:37 GMT-04:00 Jesus Guardon :
> El 25/2/17 a las 20:17, Benoît Minisini escribió:
> > Moreover, the Sourceforge svn commit mails are still broken, they
> >