Re: [Gambas-user] Question on ByteArray 63 elements

2014-01-28 Thread Tobias Boege
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014, wally wrote: Le 26/01/2014 18:03, wally a ?crit : Hello, i need to write more than 63 Bytes to an Byte[] in a structure. How to do this job ? mini example attached thank you wally Since revision #6110 the number of elements in the array constructor

Re: [Gambas-user] Question on ByteArray 63 elements

2014-01-27 Thread Jussi Lahtinen
I don't quite understand the problem. If the data is from device, then why number of parameters matter? The limit only applies when the data is written by hand directly to source code. You don't read it from stream/memory? Yes, you can put the values to string like this 1, 2, 3, ... , 63, 64, 65

Re: [Gambas-user] Question on ByteArray 63 elements

2014-01-27 Thread Benoît Minisini
Le 26/01/2014 18:03, wally a écrit : Hello, i need to write more than 63 Bytes to an Byte[] in a structure. How to do this job ? mini example attached thank you wally Since revision #6110 the number of elements in the array constructor operator ([ ... ]) is now only limited by the

Re: [Gambas-user] Question on ByteArray 63 elements

2014-01-27 Thread wally
Le 26/01/2014 18:03, wally a ?crit : Hello, i need to write more than 63 Bytes to an Byte[] in a structure. How to do this job ? mini example attached thank you wally Since revision #6110 the number of elements in the array constructor operator ([ ... ]) is now only limited by the

Re: [Gambas-user] Question on ByteArray 63 elements

2014-01-26 Thread wally
Hi Jussi, still too many arguments I do something wrong, incedible a 63 limit for Byte[] GG.src.Insert([1,2,3,4, ... , 64, 65]) wally On 01/26/2014 08:40 PM, Jussi Lahtinen wrote: Example: GG.src.Insert([1,2,3,4]) Jussi On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 7:03 PM, wally wa...@voosen.eu wrote:

Re: [Gambas-user] Question on ByteArray 63 elements

2014-01-26 Thread Tobias Boege
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014, wally wrote: Hi Jussi, still too many arguments I do something wrong, incedible a 63 limit for Byte[] GG.src.Insert([1,2,3,4, ... , 64, 65]) This is a known limit, but it has nothing special to do with the Byte[] class. IIRC, I was the one who last asked this

Re: [Gambas-user] Question on ByteArray 63 elements

2014-01-26 Thread Fabien Bodard
if it is known datas why don't you store them to a file ? 2014-01-26 Tobias Boege tabo...@gmail.com: On Sun, 26 Jan 2014, wally wrote: Hi Jussi, still too many arguments I do something wrong, incedible a 63 limit for Byte[] GG.src.Insert([1,2,3,4, ... , 64, 65]) This is a known limit,

Re: [Gambas-user] Question on ByteArray 63 elements

2014-01-26 Thread Jussi Lahtinen
No, you got me wrong... 64 is limit of arguments, so split it in two set of arguments. GG.src.Insert([1,2,3,4, ... ]) GG.src.Insert([ ... 63, 64, 65]) Jussi On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 10:59 PM, wally wa...@voosen.eu wrote: Hi Jussi, still too many arguments I do something wrong, incedible