Thanks Justen, I kinda wish that the MpC ren was able to run with android
or google computers. However, they set it up to run on macks. It's all good
though 'cause it would take me a minute to get both the mack and the M.P.C.
Renasance. Anyway, I hope one day they'll at least equip Google/android
EEven though I'm an android person, I have to say that even though Mack
may be a joke to you, they're running the game right now. The computer for
google can't even write offline. Nor does it have accessable software for
music. I wish they did 'cause it would make my android life eeasier
It's a simple matter to install raspbian on your raspberry pi, modify it
with Mike Ray's pispeak code, and have a fully operational computer that
(even with a case and battery pack) will still fit nicely in a large
pocket. Of course, keyboards and thigns add to that, I don't carry mine
You know I have been debating etting a pie.
It can run windows 10 iot (internet of things) core, as well as arch and
other linux distros but I havn't bothered with it.
Every time I start rationalising a computer, a new tablet, I start
asking myself what I want.
To be honest now we have
When I need a program that doesn't exist on the mac, I either go to places
like sourceforge and find one, or I sit down and write my own. I realize
this option isn't open to all, but to be honest, I've had to write very
few apps for myself. Especially since I'm more a terminal guy than a
Exactly. I have a mac that runs Windows. I can tell you from
experience that I have many, many fewer errors as opposed to running
Windows on a regular PC.
On 7/26/16, Tim Morris wrote:
> Windows, linix, and macs do have there place for what they can do.
> However,as far as
Windows, linix, and macs do have there place for what they can do. However,as
far as building a windows box to equal a mac is more trouble because of the
faults of windows. Anyone that has a mac and ran windows can tell you windows
runns better on a mac. The reason macs are high priced is
I have never seen the logic in using something "just because," but I
take Linux much more seriously than Mac OS.
If I ever have need to use Linux, then I will look into it, but I do
not foresee such a need.
On 7/24/16, Devin Prater wrote:
> I could go for Windows, but
I could go for Windows, but Linux, to me holds the most promise. I can always
run Windows in vmware player, which is free on Linux, or even virtual box,
which is accessible there too. I can even play video games, and the controller
can vibrate, within Linux, because the drivers are made by the
Yes, that is fair: the Mac being fairly beginner proof, I mean to say.
Happily, Windows these days is not so easily broken, i.e. back in the
bad old days of Win 95/98, where it did not take much to crash the
computer. XP introduced a much needed level of stability, and for the
time, it was a
The mac in my view, is better for beginning computer users. Now that I'm
slightly more advanced, I want more powerful applications, and way better
braille support. But that is not possible with the Mac. Besides that, there are
very little games for the Mac, and vmware fusion costs, whereas
I have no issues with Linux; in fact, I have contemplated playing
around with that particular operating system.
Macs are jokes precisely because I can build a superior machine for
less than half the cost (including the operating system). More
importantly, the Mac has poor application support
I don't understand why you would say this. I've been using a mac for more
than 10 years, and it's done everything I needed it to do for that entire
time. I've had very few issues with my macs, other than normal wear and
tear on the machines. In fact, I've had much better luck with my macs
13 matches
Mail list logo