Re: [Ganglia-developers] libganglia* for ganglia-gmetad RPM

2007-07-17 Thread Brad Nicholes
>>> On 7/17/2007 at 12:33 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/17/07, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Right. ganglia-gmond should not be including any files in the lib/ganglia > directory. > > You meant ganglia-gmetad should not be incl

Re: [Ganglia-developers] libganglia* for ganglia-gmetad RPM

2007-07-17 Thread Bernard Li
On 7/17/07, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right. ganglia-gmond should not be including any files in the lib/ganglia > directory. You meant ganglia-gmetad should not be including any files in lib/ganglia, right? Cheers, Bernard ---

Re: [Ganglia-developers] libganglia* for ganglia-gmetad RPM

2007-07-17 Thread Brad Nicholes
Right. ganglia-gmond should not be including any files in the lib/ganglia directory. Brad >>> On 7/17/2007 at 12:14 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about these files: > > /usr/lib/ganglia/modexample.a > /usr/lib/ganglia/modexample.la > /usr/l

Re: [Ganglia-developers] libganglia* for ganglia-gmetad RPM

2007-07-17 Thread Brad Nicholes
Yes and no. Both gmond and gmeta have always depended on the functionality that is provided by libganglia. The difference is that before libganglia was being statically linked into both gmond and gmetad. Now that libganglia is dynamically linked, it needs to be delivered with both RPMs. So

Re: [Ganglia-developers] libganglia* for ganglia-gmetad RPM

2007-07-17 Thread Bernard Li
How about these files: /usr/lib/ganglia/modexample.a /usr/lib/ganglia/modexample.la /usr/lib/ganglia/modexample.so /usr/lib/ganglia/modexample.so.0 /usr/lib/ganglia/modexample.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib/ganglia/modmulticpu.a /usr/lib/ganglia/modmulticpu.la /usr/lib/ganglia/modmulticpu.so /usr/lib/ganglia/m

Re: [Ganglia-developers] libganglia* for ganglia-gmetad RPM

2007-07-17 Thread Bernard Li
Hi Brad: Is this something new in trunk? I mean traditionally those files are part of the ganglia-devel pacakge and aren't needed by normal users unless they need to compile code against Ganglia. The "issue" right now is that both ganglia-gmond and ganglia-gmetad packages provide the same file(s

Re: [Ganglia-developers] gmond python module: multidisk.py

2007-07-17 Thread Brad Nicholes
>>> On 7/16/2007 at 7:54 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Brad: > > On 7/16/07, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Slurpfile is probably doing the right thing by reporting that the file > doesn't exist when it goes to read it (however it

Re: [Ganglia-developers] libganglia* for ganglia-gmetad RPM

2007-07-17 Thread Brad Nicholes
>>> On 7/16/2007 at 8:13 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Brad: > > Is /usr/lib/libganglia* needed by the ganglia-gmetad package? > > AFAIK it is only needed by gmond? > > Thanks, > > Bernard Yes it is, Gmetad uses a lot of the hash_*, err_*, deb