I can check it in.
Brad
>>> On 1/18/2008 at 12:42 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthias
Blankenhaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>
>> From what I have read about the popen2 interface, I think you are right.
> It was either that or havin
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Brad Nicholes wrote:
> From what I have read about the popen2 interface, I think you are right.
> It was either that or having to manually close the stdin.
>
I don't think I haved write access to the tree. Could you pl. check it in
or does Bernard takes care of this ?
From what I have read about the popen2 interface, I think you are right. It
was either that or having to manually close the stdin.
Brad
>>> On 1/18/2008 at 11:34 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthias
Blankenhaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Brad Nicholes wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Brad Nicholes wrote:
> I am seeing the same thing. It goes away if I use the subprocess module.
> There must be some problem in the way that popen2 is invoked that is leaving
> a defunct process.
This fixes the problem:
diff -u tcpconn.py tcpconn.py.new
--- tcpconn.
I am seeing the same thing. It goes away if I use the subprocess module.
There must be some problem in the way that popen2 is invoked that is leaving a
defunct process.
Brad
>>> On 1/17/2008 at 7:37 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Brad:
>
>
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 01:45:20PM -0500, Jesse Becker wrote:
> Another small patch. This one fixes an error introduced in r919, that
> breaks the proper display of current metric values in the charts.
> Specifically the "(now 0.23)", and similar text.
Committed revision 926.
Carlo
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 09:48:11AM -0500, Jesse Becker wrote:
> On Jan 17, 2008 12:44 AM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
> >
> > svn diff -c-921 | patch -p0 && svn merge -c810
>
> This actually reverted three lines too many, and broke the enlarging
> of optional graphs.
Which shouldn't be the case