Hi Carlo:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
wrote:
> mostly everyone using EPEL packages in CentOS/RHEL is using 3.0 and
> so EOL than branch (like was done for 2.5 which was until recently
> all that was provided by debian and still what is distributed in
> by Novell)
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 11:52:29AM -0700, Peter Phaal wrote:
> Brad,
>
> Thanks for the information on spoofing in modules.
>
> > The way that I would envision an sflow module working would be
> > similar to the spoofing example module that is currently checked
> > into the Ganglia SVN repositor
Brad,
Thanks for the information on spoofing in modules.
> The way that I would envision an sflow module working would be similar to the
> spoofing example module that is currently checked into the Ganglia SVN
> repository. The spoofing module can be found at
> http://ganglia.svn.sourceforge.
>>> On 10/8/2010 at 1:31 AM, in message <20101008073146.gc8...@sajinet.com.pe>,
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 03:23:40PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
>> Hi all:
>>
>> I'd like to request that we make one last 3.0.x bug-fix release and
>> EOL that branch.
>
> mostly ever
>>> On 10/7/2010 at 3:56 PM, in message
<6b7a9ac5-465d-4311-ac85-fd42c219d...@inmon.com>, Peter Phaal
wrote:
> Brad,
>
> Thanks for the feedback. My comments are in-line.
>
> On Oct 7, 2010, at 12:27 PM, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>
>> Sorry to jump into this thread so late but I thought that I woul
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 03:23:40PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> I'd like to request that we make one last 3.0.x bug-fix release and
> EOL that branch.
mostly everyone using EPEL packages in CentOS/RHEL is using 3.0 and
so EOL than branch (like was done for 2.5 which was until recently
a
