Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.3 beta ready for testing

2009-10-23 Thread Daniel Pocock
Bernard Li wrote: Hi Daniel: On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote: Another issue I found: the gmond binary built on RHEL3 can't run properly because APR_POLLSET_THREADSAFE is not supported on that platform. The fix for this is relatively trivial, we

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.3 beta ready for testing

2009-10-12 Thread Bernard Li
Hi Daniel: On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote: Another issue I found: the gmond binary built on RHEL3 can't run properly because APR_POLLSET_THREADSAFE is not supported on that platform.  The fix for this is relatively trivial, we will only use that

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.3 beta ready for testing

2009-10-12 Thread Brad Nicholes
On 10/11/2009 at 10:36 PM, in message 4ad2b254.9090...@pocock.com.au, Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote: Bernard Li wrote: Hi Brad: On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Brad Nicholes bnicho...@novell.com wrote: If this is just a simple fix, then I would vote for scraping 3.1.3,

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.3 beta ready for testing

2009-10-11 Thread Daniel Pocock
Bernard Li wrote: Hi Brad: On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Brad Nicholes bnicho...@novell.com wrote: If this is just a simple fix, then I would vote for scraping 3.1.3, rolling 3.1.4 with the fix and resetting the test period. The other option, since this isn't a regression, would be

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.3 beta ready for testing

2009-10-01 Thread Brad Nicholes
On 10/1/2009 at 4:33 PM, in message d4c731da0910011533p2d337d0ajc80ea158d2a7...@mail.gmail.com, Bernard Li bern...@vanhpc.org wrote: So has anybody else given 3.1.3 a test run? I have found some minor issues. It looks like there are new configure options added in regards to setuid and

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.3 beta ready for testing

2009-10-01 Thread Bernard Li
Hi Brad: On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Brad Nicholes bnicho...@novell.com wrote: If this is just a simple fix, then I would vote for scraping 3.1.3, rolling 3.1.4 with the fix and resetting the test period.  The other option, since this isn't a regression, would be to release 3.1.3 as is