On 8/21/2008 at 11:18 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Brad
Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/21/2008 at 11:04 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 09:46:47AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
On 8/21/2008 at 9:34 AM,
Bernard,
If you haven't done it already, don't tag 3.1.1 yet. There is a segfault
in gmetad that I am looking at. It is bug #200
(http://bugzilla.ganglia.info/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200). It is
another one of those bugs that is caused by a misconfiguration so it shouldn't
On 8/21/2008 at 9:34 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Brad
Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bernard,
If you haven't done it already, don't tag 3.1.1 yet. There is a
segfault in gmetad that I am looking at. It is bug #200
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 09:46:47AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
On 8/21/2008 at 9:34 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Brad
Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bernard,
If you haven't done it already, don't tag 3.1.1 yet. There is a
segfault in gmetad that I am looking at. It is bug
On 8/21/2008 at 11:04 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 09:46:47AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
On 8/21/2008 at 9:34 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Brad
Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bernard,
If you
Hi Brad:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed, we should have an official name however since the release version
number is the only required information for tracking purposes, a release name
is not important.
I originally asked Carlo to come up
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:16:53AM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
Hi Brad:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed, we should have an official name however since the release version
number is the only required information for tracking purposes, a
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 4:09 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:16:53AM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
Hi Brad:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed, we should have an
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 08:42:57AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 4:09 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:16:53AM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
But Carlo could probably create a snapshot for
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:07 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 08:42:57AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 4:09 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 11:28:06PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
On 8/16/2008 at 11:26 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:48:50AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
Due mainly to the segfault patch, I am proposing that
On 8/17/2008 at 2:02 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 11:28:06PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
On 8/16/2008 at 11:26 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 11:41:19AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
On 8/17/2008 at 2:02 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and you probably already forgot how the agreed plan of skipping 3.1.0 to
avoid getting development versions that had
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 10:59:46AM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
I am okay to roll new testing tarball as soon as we are ready
first, you need to :
* wait for a commit freeze to be aggred into and announced.
* get a release name defined for 3.1.1 and committed.
on the commit freeze, since there
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:48:50AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
But there have been some significant patches added to 3.1.1 including a
fix for a segfault in gmetad.
and a fix for tcpconn failures and errors as well as spelled in the release
notes from the STATUS file.
Due mainly to the
On 8/16/2008 at 2:20 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 10:59:46AM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
I am okay to roll new testing tarball as soon as we are ready
first, you need to :
* wait for a commit freeze to be
On 8/16/2008 at 11:26 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:48:50AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
But there have been some significant patches added to 3.1.1 including a
fix for a segfault in gmetad.
and a fix for
All,
I know it seems like just yesterday that we shipped Ganglia 3.1.0 (well
probably because it was ;) But there have been some significant patches added
to 3.1.1 including a fix for a segfault in gmetad. Due mainly to the segfault
patch, I am proposing that we tag and roll a testing
Hi Brad:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know it seems like just yesterday that we shipped Ganglia 3.1.0 (well
probably because it was ;) But there have been some significant patches
added to 3.1.1 including a fix for a segfault in gmetad. Due
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 13:59, Bernard Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Brad:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know it seems like just yesterday that we shipped Ganglia 3.1.0 (well
probably because it was ;) But there have been some significant
20 matches
Mail list logo
