Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-svn] SF.net SVN: ganglia:[1538]trunk/monitor-core/Makefile.am

2008-07-11 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 02:12:46PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: On 7/10/2008 at 2:06 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jesse Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 15:48, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/10/2008 at 12:52 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jesse

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.1.x release plan

2008-07-11 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:37:23AM -0700, Bernard Li wrote: Here's the release plan for the upcoming 3.1 release. do you mean 3.1.0? I believe all the important, show-stopping backport proposals in the STATUS file for 3.1 branch have already been processed and voted on. actually there is 1

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.1.x release plan

2008-07-11 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Friday 11 July 2008 07:02:04 am Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:37:23AM -0700, Bernard Li wrote: Here's the release plan for the upcoming 3.1 release. do you mean 3.1.0? I believe all the important, show-stopping backport proposals in the STATUS file for

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.1.x release plan

2008-07-11 Thread Brad Nicholes
On 7/11/2008 at 5:02 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:37:23AM -0700, Bernard Li wrote: So all the remaining backport proposals will be moved from BACKPORT PROPOSALS to BACKPORT PROPOSALS NEXT VERSION except for

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.1.x release plan

2008-07-11 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 09:29:06AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: On 7/11/2008 at 5:02 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is definitely unstable and not likely to be fixed before the freeze, so IMHO would be better deleted (not turned

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.1.x release plan

2008-07-11 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:10:36PM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote: Now, the web front-end is composed of MIT licensed pages and the one GPLv2+ licensed page. MIT and GPLv2+ are compatible, so this is not a problem. In my opinion, the web front-end is not a derived work of the libganglia code

Re: [Ganglia-developers] More info about the tcpconn latency issue...

2008-07-11 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:24:01PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: On 7/11/2008 at 11:15 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess I would just rather see it distributed so that the user can decide what they want to do rather than us making

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.1.x release plan

2008-07-11 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:07:08AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: On 7/10/2008 at 12:37 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bernard Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear all: Here's the release plan for the upcoming 3.1 release. I believe all the important, show-stopping backport proposals