Re: [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing

2009-11-02 Thread Paul Sobey
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:37 AM, Paul Sobey bud...@the-annexe.net wrote: We try to build most things internally. There are good reasons which I'll gladly discuss with you off-list if you'd like, but suffice to say it would be useful to be able to compile Ganglia ourselves. I have no idea how

Re: [Ganglia-general] Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing

2009-11-02 Thread Bernard Li
Hi Paul: On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Paul Sobey bud...@the-annexe.net wrote: Quick note to let you know 3.1.4 beta builds fine without Python support using gcc 4.4.1/Solaris ld (and the -std=gnu99 CFLAG). I'll continue to monitor the users list for hints as to how to build with python

Re: [Ganglia-general] [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing

2009-11-02 Thread Daniel Pocock
Bernard Li wrote: Hi Carlo: On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon care...@sajinet.com.pe wrote: Ideally, which platform is used to bootstrap shouldn't be relevant though and IMHO we should be instead aiming to the latest versions of the autotools (either

Re: [Ganglia-general] [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing

2009-11-02 Thread Bernard Li
Hi Daniel: On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote: I guess it needs to be tried - how far back to we want/need to maintain compatibility?  I need to support RHEL3 for instance. However, if it works, I'm all for using the new tools to bootstrap, and I'm

Re: [Ganglia-general] [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.1.4 beta ready for testing

2009-11-02 Thread Daniel Pocock
Bernard Li wrote: Hi Paul: On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Paul Sobey bud...@the-annexe.net wrote: Quick note to let you know 3.1.4 beta builds fine without Python support using gcc 4.4.1/Solaris ld (and the -std=gnu99 CFLAG). I'll continue to monitor the users list for hints as to