I haven't used the log tailer, but in principle it should work if you
configure Tomcat logging correctly. The overhead of tailing log files
shouldn't be significant for low volume web sites. For high volumes,
the embedded sFlow modules scale better.
There are currently sFlow implementations for Ap
Peter,
Would the log tailer work for tomcat as well?
Would you recommend sflow over the log tailer?
Thanks!
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Peter Phaal wrote:
> Vladimir's blog has a solution that involves tailing the Apache log files:
> http://vuksan.com/linux/ganglia/#Apache_Traffic_Stats
>
>
Vladimir's blog has a solution that involves tailing the Apache log files:
http://vuksan.com/linux/ganglia/#Apache_Traffic_Stats
The sFlow protocol packs a large number of metrics in each UDP
datagram, so you should see a reduction in UDP datagrams per second
associated with monitoring. The C base
Thanks Peter. Is there a way to use more a pure ganglia solution? Will
sflow generate more udp traffic and/or cpu cycles?
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Peter Phaal wrote:
> You could use a combination of Host sFlow and mod-sflow on your Apache
> web servers:
> http://www.sflow.net/
> https
You could use a combination of Host sFlow and mod-sflow on your Apache
web servers:
http://www.sflow.net/
https://github.com/sflow/mod-sflow
The following article describes how to configure the head-end gmond:
http://blog.sflow.com/2011/12/using-ganglia-to-monitor-web-farms.html
mod-sflow also ex
5 matches
Mail list logo
