On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 09:36:00PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
It never returns from ppc64_elf_gc_mark_hook (spins looking things up
in a hash table, I don't have the matching source handy). I expect
this is fixed in later binutils
2006-01-17
Is there some way we can avoid an infinite
Hi there
i'm looking for a way to emit (dump) complete global and local symbol table
entries for any given (C) program. For now, it would be satisfactory if this
was properly handled for single-source-file programs. But what i would like to
do basically is to store the entire information that
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Hi,
I'm posting this announce to this list as GCC now uses MPFR...
The release of MPFR 2.2.1 is imminent. Please help to make this
release as good as possible by downloading and testing this
release candidate:
Changes from version 2.2.0 to
Dear All,
I am considering implementing the following feature into GCC using the
patch on http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-11/msg01769.html : a
compiler probe which permits to probe the run of a compilation,
e.g. by displaying in emacs or a graphical GTK application the current
pass,
when given the -fcompiler-probe flag, it should get an a string
option with it. If this string is a (Unix) file path it indicate a
Unix socket or FIFO; if it starts with a vertical pipe bar | it
starts the command and communicate with it thru pipes. Typically the
command is some
I'm having a problem where choose_reload_regs() calls
subreg_regno_offset() with invalid parameters for my 16-bit ix86 port. It
starts out fine in emit_reload_insns():
Breakpoint 6, emit_reload_insns (chain=0x882b5a8) at reload1.c:7506
reg_last_reload_reg[nregno] =
On Nov 26, 2006, at 3:20 PM, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
The textual protcol should permit to examine, but not change, the
compilation state.
Sounds like a bad idea. I agree with the debugger comment. You're
free to start up the compilation process with ptrace from your GUI
and
I am considering implementing the following feature into GCC using
the patch on http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-11/msg01769.html
: a compiler probe which permits to probe the run of a compilation,
e.g. by displaying in emacs or a graphical GTK application the
current pass, Gimple
Hi all,
I have just come across a small difference in the way the C an C++ front
ends handle anonymous struct types which is causing me some grief. In
particular the following code:
typedef struct
{
int b1;
int b2;
} Blah;
void Function(Blah* b) {}
When i get the Blah type in the
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 12:02 +1100, Brendon Costa wrote:
And apply the TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT on Another, C++ returns Blah and C
again returns the anonymous RECORD_TYPE. In my situation this is causing
some grief as i need a consistent name for the main varient type across
translation units.
C
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the LTO branch try to achieve that the complete information for a
Program
can be sufficiently stored (in a file)? If this is already there, could anyone
provide some pointers to the API?
Yes, on the LTO branch, we are working to store the entire translation
Brendon Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hi all,
|
| I have just come across a small difference in the way the C an C++
| front ends handle anonymous struct types which is causing me some
| grief. In particular the following code:
|
| typedef struct
| {
| int b1;
| int b2;
| } Blah;
|
On Nov 6, 2006, at 7:49 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
Right now after patches by the Apple folks causes you to need a
newer dwarfutils
I think that is a bug, and that bug has now been fixed. Let me know
if there is any other badness I missed (or introduced along the way).
Right now on the
Denis Vlasenko wrote:
The following macro expands to some rather frightful code on the AVR:
#define BSWAP_16(x) \
x) 8) 0xff) | (((x) 0xff) 8))
Sometimes gcc is generating better code if you cast
values instead of masking. Try:
( (uint8_t)((x) 8) | ((uint8_t)(x)) 8 )
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-26 08:01 ---
This comes down to a tree combiner really.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-26 08:05 ---
Here is a short testcase:
int f(int a, int b)
{
int i;
int c = a=b?a:b;
for(i = 0;i1000;i++) ; // Needed otherwise Jump threading gets in the way
int d = c=a?c:a;
return d;
}
--
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-26 08:15 ---
Actually I think it is better to mark this as a dup of bug 14541 which is all
about combining expressions for math builtins.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 14541 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu
--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-26 08:15
---
*** Bug 29985 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch 2006-11-26
09:05 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] build/genconditions
../../gcc/gcc/config/pa/pa.md tmp-condmd.c: /bin/sh: 13354 Memory
fault(coredump)
I wonder if it is enough to just add DF_HARD_REGS in the df_init
All the testsuite failures (except libgomp.c++/ctor-9.C) with Sun as/ld
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-11/msg00764.html
are of the form:
ld: fatal: relocation error: R_SPARC_TLS_LE_HIX22: file /var/tmp//ccuoqyTO.o:
symbol unknown: bad symbol type SECT: symbol type must be TLS
--- Comment #18 from stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com 2006-11-26 09:19
---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] build/genconditions
../../gcc/gcc/config/pa/pa.md tmp-condmd.c: /bin/sh: 13354 Memory
fault(coredump)
Just adding DF_HARD_REGS is not enough. At least this bit:
- if (use)
This failure with Sun as/ld
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-11/msg00764.html
is of the form:
ld: fatal: relocation error: R_SPARC_HI22: file /var/tmp//cc8eBELF.o: symbol
base: relocation illegal for TLS symbol
It's a bug in Sun as, it doesn't switch section between .tbss and .bss:
--- Comment #9 from razya at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-26 10:00 ---
Subject: Bug 29122
Author: razya
Date: Sun Nov 26 10:00:18 2006
New Revision: 119220
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119220
Log:
2006-11-26 Razya Ladklesky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-26 10:04 ---
Subject: Bug 29385
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Nov 26 10:04:25 2006
New Revision: 119221
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119221
Log:
2006-11-26 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #3 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-11-26 10:05 ---
Done.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
From Ion again:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2006-11/msg00114.html
--
Summary: More stl_tree.h enhancements: improving operator=
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-26 12:26
---
Subject: Bug 29892
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sun Nov 26 12:25:50 2006
New Revision: 119223
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119223
Log:
PR fortran/29892
* trans-intrinsic.c
testcase:
#define max(a,b) quirk
#include limits
output:
/usr/include/c++/4.1.2/limits:293:22: error: macro max requires 2 arguments,
but only 1 given
/usr/include/c++/4.1.2/limits:323:23: error: macro max requires 2 arguments,
but only 1 given
/usr/include/c++/4.1.2/limits:377:23: error: macro
--- Comment #14 from vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-11-26 12:33 ---
sorry for the delay ... i just updated my local tree and proposed patch works
great, thanks :)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29114
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-26 12:34
---
Fixed for array bounds checking on mainline. I'll backport the patch to 4.2 in
some time.
We still need to figure something out for the substrings case (see comment #0):
Secondly, gfc_conv_substring_expr
--- Comment #11 from chris_clayton at f1internet dot com 2006-11-26 12:54
---
I'm the reporter of 29809, which is a duplicate of this bug. I'm not familiar
with the workflow here, so do I simply wait for 4.1.2 or is there likely to be
patch to test before 4.1.2 is released? Is the
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-26 13:09
---
Usually you wait until a patch is available or 4.1.2 is released (supposed the
problem is fixed there). You can try testing the ad-hoc fix in PR29809 comment
#4.
--
--- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-11-26 13:38 ---
As a matter of fact, I think that the undefs in stl_algobase.h are legacy
stuff, and should go away. In my opinion, we should always error in such cases,
because nobody knows whether the user means his own max / min macro,
--- Comment #1 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-26 13:38 ---
Hi, Richard.
I don't understand completely what you mean. Is the problem in the builtin
exp() ? Should it check its argument for large numbers?
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-26 13:56 ---
The problem is that we believe we can handle all errno checking/setting via
the expand_errno_check() routine which is not true for overflow/underflow but
only for invalid arguments that result in a NaN.
--
--- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-26 13:57 ---
This will be fixed by the new Wconversion option. Actually, it has been fixed
already for gcc version 4.3.0 20061124 (experimental).
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ local/bin/g++ -c -Wconversion pr18821.C
pr18821.C: In function
--- Comment #5 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-26 13:59 ---
For reference:
Author: manu
Date: Fri Nov 24 01:50:33 2006
New Revision: 119143
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119143
Log:
2006-11-24 Manuel Lopez-Ibanez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR c/2707
--- Comment #1 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-26 14:02 ---
Is this a known bug or do we need to report it to Sun?
If known, is there a patch we can recommend in the Solaris-specific
installation docs?
--
ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-26 14:03 ---
Is this a known bug or do we need to report it to Sun?
If known, is there a patch we can recommend in the Solaris-specific
installation docs?
--
ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18821
--- Comment #13 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-11-26 14:30 ---
Subject: Bug number PR25620
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-11/msg01758.html
--
--- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-26 14:35
---
Is this a known bug or do we need to report it to Sun?
I quickly skimmed through Sun linker patches but didn't find anything.
The problem is of course that all works flawlessly with the Sun toolchain
in default
--- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-26 14:38
---
Is this a known bug or do we need to report it to Sun?
Since the Sun toolchain doesn't use the assembler by default, it is very
likely unknown to them.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29987
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-26 18:08 ---
Subject: Bug 29982
Author: pinskia
Date: Sun Nov 26 18:08:14 2006
New Revision: 119227
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119227
Log:
2006-11-25 Andrew Pinski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-26 18:15
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-26 18:25
---
The problem with RTH's patch was the use of t which shadowed the variable in
the function which is used for setting the locus. I am testing the corrected
patch now.
--
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-26 19:16 ---
That's actually ICE on invalid, you can't throw out of a parallel region.
OpenMP 2.5, section 2.4 says:
A throw executed inside a parallel region must cause execution to resume
within the same parallel region, and it
--- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-26 19:27 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #2)
The problem is that we reset TREE_OVERFLOW:
It would seem it overflows incremented, and underflow's decremented,
only a terminal non-zero count would represent
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-26 19:51 ---
I have a fix by not never producing MAX_EXPRa,a or MIN_EXPRa,a in reassoc.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from membar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-26 19:53 ---
Subject: Bug 29151
Author: membar
Date: Sun Nov 26 19:53:11 2006
New Revision: 119230
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119230
Log:
PR libgcj/29151:
* java/lang/natWin32Process.cc (startProcess):
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-26 20:03 ---
Here is the patch which I am testing:
Index: tree-ssa-reassoc.c
===
--- tree-ssa-reassoc.c (revision 119229)
+++ tree-ssa-reassoc.c (working copy)
@@
--- Comment #22 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-26 20:39
---
Created an attachment (id=12696)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12696action=view)
Serious attempt
Hi folks,
here is a serious attempt at the patch. Jerry, if
you could give it a spin, I'd be
--- Comment #23 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-26 20:43
---
Created an attachment (id=12697)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12697action=view)
Test case
Here's a test case for reading and writing with
a restricted subrecord length.
--
--- Comment #13 from chris_clayton at f1internet dot com 2006-11-26 21:22
---
(In reply to comment #12)
Usually you wait until a patch is available or 4.1.2 is released (supposed the
problem is fixed there). You can try testing the ad-hoc fix in PR29809
comment
#4.
OK, I've
--- Comment #24 from jvdelisle at verizon dot net 2006-11-26 22:27 ---
Subject: Re: implement unformatted files with subrecords
(Intel style)
I have reviewed the patch and I have one minor comment. I suggest that the
continued flag be placed in with the unit flags similar to
--- Comment #19 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-11-27
00:28 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] build/genconditions
../../gcc/gcc/config/pa/pa.md tmp-condmd.c: /bin/sh: 13354 MO
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] build/genconditions
../../gcc/gcc/config/pa/pa.md
--- Comment #6 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-11-27 02:00 ---
Excellent, this is exactly the quote that settles this. For
reference, 14.3.1/3 comes with a (as usual non-normative) example:
[Example:
templateclass T struct A {
static T t;
};
typedef
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-27 02:58
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-27 03:39
---
Subject: Bug 29886
Author: mmitchel
Date: Mon Nov 27 03:38:57 2006
New Revision: 119242
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119242
Log:
PR c++/29886
* parser.c (cp_parser): Add
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-27 03:46
---
Fixed in 4.3.0.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Configured with: ../gcc-4.1.1/configure --prefix=/opt/local
--enable-languages=c,c++,java,objc,obj-c++,fortran
--libdir=/opt/local/lib/gcc41 --includedir=/opt/local/include/gcc41
--infodir=/opt/local/share/info --mandir=/opt/local/share/man
--with-local-prefix=/opt/local --with-system-zlib
--- Comment #1 from yves at gnu-darwin dot org 2006-11-27 04:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=12699)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12699action=view)
NSFramework_PopplerKit.mi
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29990
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-27 04:38
---
Subject: Bug 29886
Author: mmitchel
Date: Mon Nov 27 04:38:34 2006
New Revision: 119243
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119243
Log:
PR c++/29886
* parser.c (cp_parser): Add
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-27 04:39
---
Fixed in 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-27 04:49 ---
I don't think you can use -flat_namespace with dynamic libraries and libstdc++.
Also this should have been fixed by:
* config/darwin.c (machopic_select_section): Remove the hack to
mark ::operator
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 04:49 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-27 04:49
---
I don't think you can use -flat_namespace with dynamic libraries and
libstdc++.
Also I don't think this is a GCC issue. I think it is
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-11-27 04:51 ---
Subject: Re: Linking fails because __ZdlPv can't be a
weak definition
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 04:49 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-27 04:56
---
Subject: Bug 29886
Author: mmitchel
Date: Mon Nov 27 04:56:02 2006
New Revision: 119244
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119244
Log:
PR c++/29886
* parser.c (cp_parser): Add
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-27 04:56
---
Fixed in 4.2.0.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-27 05:01 ---
Subject: Bug 29982
Author: pinskia
Date: Mon Nov 27 05:00:58 2006
New Revision: 119245
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119245
Log:
2006-11-26 Andrew Pinski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-27 05:01 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #15 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-27 05:46
---
(In reply to comment #14)
The problem with RTH's patch was the use of t which shadowed the variable in
the function which is used for setting the locus. I am testing the corrected
patch now.
That fixed most
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 05:46 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
That fixed most of the failures but there are still some ICEs that need to be
fixed.
I have a fix for those ICEs, it is just checking for DECL_P.
-- Pinski
--- Comment #16 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-11-27 05:51 ---
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] badly formatted warnings for SRA
replacements used uninitialized
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 05:46 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
That fixed most of the failures but there are
--- Comment #2 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-11-27 06:19 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3 regression] ICE on optional arg
Andrew,
We are calling build_int_cst on a real type.
Yes, I discovered the same on my flight back to France last night. Will
come up with a fix tonight.
--- Comment #17 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-27 06:41
---
Here is the patch which passes the C++ testsuite, I have to do a full
bootstrap/testsuite run still but I am happy with it currrently which is why I
am pasting it here:
Index: error.c
--- Comment #20 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-11-27 07:16 ---
This may be a df bug too. I don't know if it is ok to expect, when
DF_HARD_REGS is set, that the list of defs include a def for every hard
register that is call-clobbered and live at the call?
--
bonzini at gnu dot
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-27 07:51
---
(In reply to comment #9)
Though the good question is why we have those PHIs still there even though
they
don't do anything except produce a copy. All the copyprop passes as far as I
can tell skip them
79 matches
Mail list logo
