[Bug tree-optimization/32461] [4.3 Regression] Segmentation fault in build_classic_dist_vector_1() at tree-data-ref.c:2700

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug debug/32444] missing debug information for structure components with optimized code

--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-24 04:04 --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-01/msg00016.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32444

[Bug debug/32445] no debug information for loop counters

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-24 04:07 --- On the mainline, we have ivtmp.33 going from 1 to 101 so it does not equal the same as what i is. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32445

[Bug tree-optimization/32075] can't determine dependence between p-a[x+i] and p-a[x+i+1] where x is invariant but defined in the function

--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-24 04:07 --- Fixed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/32448] abs / printf bug

--- Comment #19 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-06-24 05:01 --- So here we have it: #include stdio.h int abs(int); double fabs(double); int main() { printf(%f %f %f %f\n, abs(1234.5678), fabs(1234.5678), abs((int)1234.5678), abs((int)(1234.5678))); printf(%f %f %f

[Bug c/32448] abs / printf bug

--- Comment #20 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-24 05:08 --- Since GCC can 'see' the %f at compile time Yes it can but that does not mean the behavior is the correct to cast it to float. In fact the behavior is undefined at runtime so you are just running into the runtime

<    1   2