On 26/11/2008, at 4:16 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 01:22:35PM -0800, Geoffrey Keating wrote:
Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Iain,
The use of the system libgcc simply won't work on Mac OS X 10.4.
The missing __Unwind_GetIPInfo only exists in libgcc_s.10.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 01:22:35PM -0800, Geoffrey Keating wrote:
> Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Iain,
> >The use of the system libgcc simply won't work on Mac OS X 10.4.
> > The missing __Unwind_GetIPInfo only exists in libgcc_s.10.5.dylib
> > and not libgcc_s.10.4.dylib...
Timo Kreuzer wrote:
>I am working on x64 SEH for ReactOS. The idea is to use .cfi_escape
>codes to mark the code positions where the try block starts / ends and
>of the except landing pad. The emitted .eh_frame section is parsed after
>linking and converted into Windows compatible unwind info / sc
Snapshot gcc-4.2-20081126 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.2-20081126/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.2 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 11:59:03AM +, IainS wrote:
> > Hello Jack,
> > On 21 Nov 2008, at 18:35, Jack Howarth wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 03:57:15PM +, IainS wrote:
> >>> When 'make checking', I conventionally move the built libgcc_s.
Hi -
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:49:48AM +0530, mal reddy y wrote:
> The libmudflap.log contains ,
> [...]
> Executing on mips-sony-linux: /tmp/fail10-frag.exe.32708(timeout = 3000)
> call-remote
> standard exec
> Executing mips-sony-linux:/tmp/fail10-frag.exe.32708 <
> /*usr/bin/ssh
2008/11/26 Tobias Burnus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
>>> Username : (**)
>>> Password : (**)
>>> Date of Birth :
>>> Future Password : ()(Option)
>>
>> Do they really think that it will succeed ???
>> I guess not.
>
> I guess they do. For spam, the repl
Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
>> Username : (**)
>> Password : (**)
>> Date of Birth :
>> Future Password : ()(Option)
>
> Do they really think that it will succeed ???
> I guess not.
I guess they do. For spam, the reply rate might be as low as low as 1 in
12 million, for pis
Mail Support Team wrote:
>
> In order to continue using our services you are require to update
> and re-comfirmed your email account details as requested below.
> To complete your account re-comfirmation,you must reply to this email
> immediately and enter your account details as requested below.
Dear Email Account User,
We wrote to you on 29 October 2008 advising that you change the
password on your account in order to prevent any unauthorised
account access following the network instruction we previously
communicated.
All Mailhub systems will undergo regularly scheduled maintenance.
Acc
Steve Kargl wrote:
Not if you don't include the standard deviation and/or variance.
With only 16 samples, having 2 rather large outlier points will
skew the mean.
Seems a bit of special pleading to me. Actually outliers are
quite indicative. Often you don't care much if there is 5-10%
differen
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:47:07AM -0500, Robert Dewar wrote:
> Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> >With regard to the top 10% performance, Absoft is simply comparing
> >the overall mean performance numbers from the Polyhedron Benchmark.
> >gfortran will never look good by that metric because there are at
> >
Robert Dewar wrote:
>> With regard to the top 10% performance, Absoft is simply comparing
>> the overall mean performance numbers from the Polyhedron Benchmark.
>> gfortran will never look good by that metric because there are at
>> least 2 programs that would benefit from in-lining non-contained
>
Steve Kargl wrote:
With regard to the top 10% performance, Absoft is simply comparing
the overall mean performance numbers from the Polyhedron Benchmark.
gfortran will never look good by that metric because there are at
least 2 programs that would benefit from in-lining non-contained
subprograms
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 01:55:01PM +0100, Mikael Morin wrote:
> Steve Kargl wrote:
> > Dear Absoft,
> >
> > Please fix the errors on your web page:
> >
> > http://www.absoft.com/Absoft_Windows_Compiler.htm
> >
> Do you really think they will change their webpage to one that
> explicitly states t
Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
They even give the impression that an open source plotting package is
specific to their compiler. Incidentally, I am so wedded to DISLIN,
for which the gfotran version is free, that I have never tried to
build plplot; has any body tried it?
Yes, I have. I help ma
Mikael and Steve,
> Do you really think they will change their webpage to one that
> explicitly states that their compiler has a competitor with comparable
> features, which is at least as fast, supports more platforms and is
> available for free?
> I would be very surprised if they do.
>
I think
Steve Kargl wrote:
> Dear Absoft,
>
> Please fix the errors on your web page:
>
> http://www.absoft.com/Absoft_Windows_Compiler.htm
>
> The comparison chart is not only misleading, it is a down
> right lie! The last column is labeled "GNU g77 gfortran".
> g77 and gfortran are completely differe
> For critical things I did just what -frtl-abstract-sequences did (along
> with some hand optimizing) and I've seen performance improvements of 50%
> and more just by getting my working set of code to fit into the cache-size.
>
> Once the feature is removed: Will there ever be any chance that t
19 matches
Mail list logo