We are trying to add a 16bit integer division library function for
bfin port. I just found GCC didn't do integral promotions when calling
library function.
For example, in function foo, I can assume both arguments are zero
extended from unsigned short to unsigned int.
extern unsigned short foo (u
Quoting Paolo Bonzini :
Maybe we can use this in AC_CHECK_DECLS instead of having a new
separate macro. If there is a parenthesis in the name call the new
version, if there is none, call the old one.
You shouldn't need to keep the old version around, it's supposed to be
a drop-in replacement.
>> Maybe we can use this in AC_CHECK_DECLS instead of having a new
>> separate macro. If there is a parenthesis in the name call the new
>> version, if there is none, call the old one.
>
> You shouldn't need to keep the old version around, it's supposed to be
> a drop-in replacement. The reason I
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Saleel Kudchadker wrote:
> Hi I am working on calling the instrument function before every
> function call automatically. I tried inserting this pass which would
> add my function to every edge
>
> //
>
> static unsigned int
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Steven Bosscher wrote:
>
>> Mark just made an ICE in the compiler with non-default options a P1
>> bug for GCC 4.5 (xf.
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2010-02/msg01695.html).
>>
>> Can someone please explain why this kind of bug should be
Hi I am working on calling the instrument function before every
function call automatically. I tried inserting this pass which would
add my function to every edge
//
static unsigned int spmm_insert(void){
struct cgraph_edge *e;
struct cgraph_node *nod
Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Mark just made an ICE in the compiler with non-default options a P1
> bug for GCC 4.5 (xf.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2010-02/msg01695.html).
>
> Can someone please explain why this kind of bug should be of
> release-blocking priority?
As I wrote in the PR, I want
Hi,
Mark just made an ICE in the compiler with non-default options a P1
bug for GCC 4.5 (xf.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2010-02/msg01695.html).
Can someone please explain why this kind of bug should be of
release-blocking priority?
Thanks,
Ciao!
Steven
Quoting Paolo Bonzini :
Maybe we can use this in AC_CHECK_DECLS instead of having a new
separate macro. If there is a parenthesis in the name call the new
version, if there is none, call the old one.
You shouldn't need to keep the old version around, it's supposed to be
a drop-in replacement.
On 02/17/2010 04:41 PM, Joern Rennecke wrote:
Quoting Ralf Wildenhues :
sed alternation \| is not portable.
I've replaced it now with a pair of substitutions. I also fixed
the ',' substitution to give yield on opening bracket for the next cast,
and to apply for all commas.
+ $[]as_decl_type
Quoting Ralf Wildenhues :
sed alternation \| is not portable.
I've replaced it now with a pair of substitutions. I also fixed
the ',' substitution to give yield on opening bracket for the next cast,
and to apply for all commas.
+ $[]as_decl_type
What is this variable? It doesn't seem to
On 02/17/2010 04:50 AM, dib.cool...@gmail.com wrote:
> hi...
> I am a student of b.sc first yr in comp.science
> can you tell me
>
> which parsing technique is used in ANSI c language and in gcc?
A hand-written recursive descent parser. It's in gcc/c-parse.c.
> and how the parse tree is ge
Здравствуйте!
Ваш знакомый Обухов Д.В dmitiy.obu...@gmail.com, предлагает вам ознакомиться с
идеей ответственности избираемых народом Президента и депутатов, смысл которой
в следующем: поскольку единственным источником власти в России является её
народ (ст.3 Конституции РФ), а ответственности б
13 matches
Mail list logo
