On Tue, 18 May 2010, Mark Mitchell wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Release%20Manager%20Q%26A
I note that many of the questions already added to that page could be seen
as suggesting a greater role for the RMs than there is at present in
setting directions for GCC development. RMs (in their
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
I note that many of the questions already added to that page could be seen
as suggesting a greater role for the RMs than there is at present in
setting directions for GCC development. RMs (in their RM capacity) do not
set priorities or make plans for GCC
Hello,
I am hit by an ICE in LTO (latest GCC4.5 branch). The problem
is that it shows up in our target/our target-specific application,
so I cannot really reduce test case and file a bug.
getShortVersionString.clone.0/1(-1) @0x2aa0c5fea0 (clone of
getShortVersionString/4733) availability:local
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Bingfeng Mei b...@broadcom.com wrote:
Hello,
I am hit by an ICE in LTO (latest GCC4.5 branch). The problem
is that it shows up in our target/our target-specific application,
so I cannot really reduce test case and file a bug.
Yes, that is the reason. One of our generated source file
is compiled with -O0 with no particular reason and no one
noticed. Thanks.
Cheers,
Bingfeng
-Original Message-
From: Richard Guenther [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 May 2010 16:12
To: Bingfeng Mei
Cc:
Sn.Yetkili;
Ürünlerinizin tanıtımı ve firmanızın marka prestiji konusunda değer katacağını
düşündüğüm bir reklam teklifidir.
1 ay boyunca erkek hedef kitlede öğle kuşağında 4 ayrı kanalda
aksam kuşağında 4 ayrı kanalda toplaMda 8 ayrı kanalda yayınlanacak dolu dolu
bir reklam paketidir.
Hello,
I have a question about code generated by g++.
When compiling a C++ class, even as simple as the one below,
the code for the constructor is instantiated twice and the code for the
destructor is instanciated twice or three times.
= myclass.cpp =
class MyClass
{
MyClass();
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Lénaïc Huard lenaic.hu...@laposte.net wrote:
If I remove the virtual keyword to make the class non-polymorphic, the
constructor is still compiled twice, as well as the destructor.
Would anyone have the patience to explain me why the constructors/destructors
Hello every body
I have read the rtl.h rtl.c,
but I don't realize the format for insn, call_insn and junp_insn
it's define in rtl.def
DEF_RTL_EXPR(JUMP_INSN, jump_insn, iuuBieie0, RTX_INSN)
and it's dump by some real program
(jump_insn 14 /* i */
13 /* u */
Bernhard == Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com writes:
Bernhard - should handle structs.
There are some other difficult cases.
First, don't let this discourage you :-). I think this would be a
useful feature.
I think in general you cannot actually ever tell if a header is unused
kito npick...@gmail.com writes:
Hello every body
I have read the rtl.h rtl.c,
but I don't realize the format for insn, call_insn and junp_insn
it's define in rtl.def
DEF_RTL_EXPR(JUMP_INSN, jump_insn, iuuBieie0, RTX_INSN)
and it's dump by some real program
(jump_insn 14 /* i */
sorry I get incorrect gcc version info
the correct version which doing dump is gcc 4.1.2
I dump rtl with the gcc 4.4.1 have the line info
thanks for you reply
2010/5/20 Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com:
kito npick...@gmail.com writes:
Hello every body
I have read the rtl.h rtl.c,
but I
On Linux/ia64,gcc.dg/lto/20100518 c_lto_20100518_0.o failed
with
Executing on host: /export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/bld/gcc/xgcc
-B/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/bld/gcc/ -O0 -fwhopr -c -o
c_lto_20100518_0.o
/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/src-4.5/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/20100518_0.c
--- Comment #24 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-05-19 06:47 ---
Can you try this patch:
Index: configure.ac
===
--- configure.ac(revision 159481)
+++ configure.ac(working copy)
@@ -3254,9 +3254,10 @@
--- Comment #19 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 07:22 ---
Subject: Bug 43591
Author: burnus
Date: Wed May 19 07:22:00 2010
New Revision: 159556
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=159556
Log:
2010-05-19 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
PR
--- Comment #20 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 07:24 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
Patch was applied to trunk about 6 weeks ago - how are the backporting plans?
Thanks for the reminder!
Thorsten: Thanks for the bug report.
As I do not intent to backport it to 4.4.x:
--- Comment #10 from kevin dot bowling at kev009 dot com 2010-05-19 08:33
---
Seeing Bruce's symptoms here, no relation to -Os vs -O2. gcc-4.5.0 on Gentoo
~amd64.
--
kevin dot bowling at kev009 dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 09:14
---
I need the version without precompiled header.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44101
--- Comment #18 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 09:15 ---
Hi David,
Could you test the suggested patch for AIX? Richard told me that the patch is
sensible, but the attribute merging is something to be tested for AIX.
Thanks in advance,
Kai
--
ktietz at gcc dot gnu
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44195
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 09:38 ---
Confirmed.
We already expand it that way:
;; s = foo ();
(insn 5 4 6 t.c:7 (set (reg:QI 0 ax)
(const_int 0 [0x0])) -1 (nil))
(call_insn 6 5 7 t.c:7 (set (parallel:BLK [
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44193
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44192
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 10:13 ---
RTL DSE doesn't handle this because the call to bar, which isn't a const
function, is considered a wild read and thus makes all stores necessary in the
global as well as local algorithm.
RTL DSE doesn't consider
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 10:22 ---
At leas the stores to s have alias info:
(insn 12 10 14 2 t.c:7 (set (mem/s/c:DI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 20 frame)
(const_int -16 [0xfff0])) [2 s+0 S8 A128])
(reg:DI 60)) 89
--- Comment #5 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 10:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=20697)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20697action=view)
preprocessed source code
this time without pch
--
ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #20 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 10:39 ---
This seems to be the same problem that breaks Solaris 8/9 SPARC bootstrap with
Sun
as: several libjava tools fail to link:
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 11:38 ---
Confirmed. Adding spu maintainers to CC.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-05-19 11:43 ---
This bug also affects 4.5 and 4.4, but not 4.3, making it a regression from
4.3. The fix for 4.6 backports cleanly to 4.5 and with minor fuzz to 4.4, and
has been verified to fix the problem on those branches too with no
--- Comment #3 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 11:44 ---
Subject: Bug 34505
Author: dfranke
Date: Wed May 19 11:43:53 2010
New Revision: 159558
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=159558
Log:
gcc/fortran/:
2010-05-19 Daniel Franke
--- Comment #4 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 11:46 ---
Fixed in trunk. Closing
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34505
--- Comment #7 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-05-19 11:50
---
How it can possibly not affect 4.3? The code is exactly the same.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44190
--- Comment #8 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-05-19 11:57 ---
I just compiled the original test case with 4.5, 4.4, and 4.3, and the assert
didn't trigger when compiled with 4.3. I didn't investigate any further.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44190
--- Comment #9 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-05-19 12:01
---
Given the identical resize code, missing a real analysis of why the patch is
needed in mainline and isn't in 4.3, I don't feel comfortable committing the
patch to the older branches, since nobody else
--- Comment #10 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-05-19 12:06
---
Ok, now I see, vector::capacity itself has been changed between 4.3 and 4.4.
Let's apply the patch to 4.5 too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44190
--- Comment #11 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 12:09 ---
Subject: Bug 44190
Author: paolo
Date: Wed May 19 12:08:53 2010
New Revision: 159560
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=159560
Log:
2010-05-19 Eelis van der Weegen gcc-bugzi...@contacts.eelis.net
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.0 |4.5.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44190
--- Comment #25 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-05-19 12:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=20698)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20698action=view)
complete patch
Can you please test the complete patch if it solves your bootstrap failure?
--
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-debug
Known to fail|4.4.3 4.6.0 |4.4.3
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43698
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|bootstrap |target
Known to fail||4.5.0
--- Comment #12 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-05-19 12:29 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Let's apply the patch to 4.5 too.
Thanks!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44190
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 12:32 ---
Re-confirmed. Honza - you fixed sth like that for LTO, can you look at this
please?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 12:34
---
See comment #4. I believe this is a pilot error.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43810
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Version|unknown |4.4.3
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Version|unknown |4.4.3
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 12:52 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43897
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43905
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43987
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 12:54
---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44018
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44038
--- Comment #5 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 12:55 ---
Subject: Bug 38404
Author: dfranke
Date: Wed May 19 12:55:26 2010
New Revision: 159561
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=159561
Log:
gcc/fortran/:
2010-05-19 Daniel Franke
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 12:56 ---
Confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 12:56 ---
Fixed in trunk. Closing.
Thanks for the report!
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 12:57 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Fixed in trunk. Closing
Second try.
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 12:57 ---
Confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44041
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44061
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44069
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Summary|[4.5/4.6 regression] massive|[4.5/4.6
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Known to work||4.6.0
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44164
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44174
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44182
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44193
--- Comment #5 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 13:04 ---
Happens for me, too.
Kenneth, as the author of this code, could you have a look?
Thanks.
Rainer
--
ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 13:07 ---
Subject: Bug 42360
Author: dfranke
Date: Wed May 19 13:07:25 2010
New Revision: 159562
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=159562
Log:
gcc/fortran/:
2010-05-19 Daniel Franke
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.0 |4.5.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43455
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 13:16 ---
And 4.5.1.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 13:16 ---
Subject: Bug 43946
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 19 13:14:37 2010
New Revision: 159564
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=159564
Log:
2010-05-19 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 13:16 ---
Subject: Bug 43455
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 19 13:14:37 2010
New Revision: 159564
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=159564
Log:
2010-05-19 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 13:16 ---
Subject: Bug 42425
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 19 13:14:37 2010
New Revision: 159564
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=159564
Log:
2010-05-19 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 13:16 ---
Subject: Bug 43080
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 19 13:14:37 2010
New Revision: 159564
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=159564
Log:
2010-05-19 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 13:16 ---
Subject: Bug 42425
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 19 13:14:37 2010
New Revision: 159564
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=159564
Log:
2010-05-19 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 13:16 ---
Subject: Bug 42653
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 19 13:14:37 2010
New Revision: 159564
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=159564
Log:
2010-05-19 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.0 |4.5.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43080
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.0 |4.5.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43946
--- Comment #3 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 13:28 ---
Fixed in trunk. Closing.
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
When trying to compile and link the attached file bug_lto.ii with LTO the link
process dies with the message lto1: internal compiler error: Segmentation
fault
Everything is fine if I do not use -flto for linking the shared library.
Command line that triggers the bug:
$
--- Comment #1 from martin dot kronbichler at it dot uu dot se 2010-05-19
13:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=20699)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20699action=view)
File that triggers the problem when linking a shared library
A reduced testcase. Extracted from the
--- Comment #6 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2010-05-19 13:41
---
I have a deadline and do not have time to play with this. The comparison
function in df-scan.c, df_ref_compare, is not stable according to what has been
discussed in pr42157. however, it does satisfy the
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 13:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=20700)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20700action=view)
gcc46-pr44178.patch
Untested fix.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 13:59 ---
Confirmed. Reducing.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2010-05-19
14:03 ---
Subject: Re: ICE in gcc/config/soft-fp/divtf3.c
--- Comment #6 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2010-05-19 13:41
---
I have a deadline and do not have time to play with this. The
--- Comment #8 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2010-05-19 14:06
---
df maintainers cannot approve their own patches. you should get bonzini or
any other back end maintainer to approve it.
thanks for doing the testing.
kenny
--
--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2010-05-19
14:07 ---
Subject: Re: ICE in gcc/config/soft-fp/divtf3.c
--- Comment #8 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2010-05-19 14:06
---
df maintainers cannot approve their own patches. you should get
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 14:10 ---
template typename Ordinal
struct DirectSerializationTraits
{
static void fromCountToDirectBytes(const Ordinal count) {}
};
templatetypename Ordinal class SerializationTraits
: public
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 14:40 ---
Hm, we still have TYPE_DECLs in TYPE_FIELDs somehow. I have a patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44196
--- Comment #17 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 14:43
---
No more ICE, removed keyword.
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #21 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 14:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=20701)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20701action=view)
latest..
this is mostly there ... might be worth trying on other platforms for feedback.
without the catch-net
--- Comment #22 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 14:48
---
Subject: Bug 43987
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 19 14:48:24 2010
New Revision: 159567
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=159567
Log:
2010-05-19 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 14:52 ---
The problem is just that there are no instructions with locus on line 4 - with
unrolling no traces of the for loop in the assembly remains and all
instructions in the body have line 5 and immediately after it another
--- Comment #22 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 14:54 ---
I would imagine that this will ultimately affect all EMUTLS targets even tho
it's against darwin.
tree-profile.c is generating gimple directly for the inserted statements -
AFAICT it's assuming that these don't
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 14:54 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 14:55 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 14:56 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 15:01 ---
Hm, we have a cgraph node
ConstValueTypeSerializationBufferOrdinal::ConstValueTypeSerializationBuffer(Ordinal)
[with Ordinal = int]/2(1) @0x77edd930 (asm:
_ZN33ConstValueTypeSerializationBufferIiEC2Ei) analyzed
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
