On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
Gidi Nave gidi.nav...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
Gidi Nave gidi.nav...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Jie Zhang j...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Dear Steering Committee:
The current listed maintainer for option handling is:
option handling Neil Booth n...@daikokuya.co.uk
But I'm wondering if Neil is still active. There are no replies to my
On 01/12/2011 06:07 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Jie Zhangj...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Dear Steering Committee:
The current listed maintainer for option handling is:
option handling Neil Booth n...@daikokuya.co.uk
But I'm wondering if
First, the problem: I've got a C library I want to share. There are
many users who want to use it. This should be as easy as breathing,
but it's not!
My users and I face what I'm calling GNU/Linux Innovation Red Tape.
This library is two files: sonic.c and sonic.h. To share it in
Debian,
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 06:07:48AM -0500, Bill Cox wrote:
Unfortunately, while I could implement this idea in a few days, the
red tape would keep it in limbo so long that I'll likely die of old
age before it gets into Debian Stable. Oh, well... here's the dumb
idea anyway... In short,
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Robert Millan wrote:
Hi Joseph
I'll look at more detail at the other problems, but first it
seems that non-Linux GNU targets are currently broken
because many declarations that are not Linux-specific
have been added to the Linux-specific sections of
config.gcc.
I
2011/1/12 Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com:
I don't think they are necessarily broken - and if they are, it is because
of Linux-specific headers being used in non-Linux-specific code, not the
other way round.
Actually, it's a different problem. I'll just prepare a patch and
send it,
2011/1/12 Bill Cox waywardg...@gmail.com:
$ gcc myprog.c -lgit://github/~waywardgeek/sonic=0.1
You already have this, it's called FUSE. E.g.
$ sshfs $publicrepo $tmp
$ gcc myprog.c -I$tmp $tmp/sonic.c
If you want it to speak GIT protocol, just write a GIT
extension, etc.
--
Robert Millan
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 01:43:51PM +0100, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 06:07:48AM -0500, Bill Cox wrote:
Unfortunately, while I could implement this idea in a few days, the
red tape would keep it in limbo so long that I'll likely die of old
age before it gets into
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/12/11 01:45, Gidi Nave wrote:
One more question:
GCC usually knows how to handle cases which need decomposition of
expressions due to architecture limitations.
In my case it didn't know.
How can I foreseen additional such cases, in order
2011/1/1 Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com:
[...] I found
several possible problems with the configurations for *-kfreebsd-gnu,
*-knetbsd-gnu and *-kopensolaris-gnu.
Ok. Unless indicated otherwise, my answers below apply to
*-kfreebsd-gnu, which is the only in these 3 systems that is
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Axel Freyn axel-fr...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 01:43:51PM +0100, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 06:07:48AM -0500, Bill Cox wrote:
Unfortunately, while I could implement this idea in a few days, the
red tape would keep it
On 12/01/2011 12:07, Bill Cox wrote:
First, the problem: I've got a C library I want to share. There are
many users who want to use it. This should be as easy as breathing,
but it's not!
My users and I face what I'm calling GNU/Linux Innovation Red Tape.
This library is two files: sonic.c
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/12/11 01:45, Gidi Nave wrote:
One more question:
GCC usually knows how to handle cases which need decomposition of
expressions due to architecture limitations.
In my case
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Robert Millan wrote:
* These configurations use file_end_indicate_exec_stack to use the
PT_GNU_STACK convention. While some of the implementation of this
is in the GNU linker and glibc, it also requires kernel support for
correct operation. Do all these kernels
On 12 January 2011 14:07, Bill Cox wrote:
Well, after a short nap, the thought of fixing this in gcc seems even
dumber to me, though the problem is quite real. Another tool called
before gcc could get the header and library files into a place where
they could be used. It could even be
Hi all,
I'm in the early stages of a Leon-based project, and have been trying to put
together a cross toolchain for it. I'm having some problems getting it
configured and working correctly, and this proposed option would very likely
help me a lot.
Is there any time scale for implementation,
Hello all.
I have a idea for automatic generation of headers in a c++ program.
Having to maintain headers is a very time consuming task, and I think
we will all benefit from such a thing. The idea is the following:
Each time the compiler finds the pragma
#pragma autoinclude(foo.hpp)
it does
Robert Millan r...@gnu.org writes:
I'm not familiar with PT_GNU_STACK. Does a working
_dl_make_stack_executable() in glibc [1] indicate it's supported?
[1]
http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/glibc-bsd/trunk/glibc-ports/kfreebsd/dl-execstack.c?revision=1685view=markup
PT_GNU_STACK is a program
On 12/01/2011 13:50, Jeff Law wrote:
On 01/12/11 01:45, Gidi Nave wrote:
One more question:
GCC usually knows how to handle cases which need decomposition of
expressions due to architecture limitations.
In my case it didn't know.
How can I foreseen additional such cases, in order to avoid
On 12/01/2011 16:22, Achilleas Margaritis wrote:
Hello all.
I have a idea for automatic generation of headers in a c++ program.
Having to maintain headers is a very time consuming task, and I think
we will all benefit from such a thing. The idea is the following:
Each time the compiler finds
Bill Cox waywardg...@gmail.com writes:
$ gcc myprog.c -lgit://github/~waywardgeek/sonic=0.1
In Go we have a program goinstall which looks at import statements and
pulls in required libraries, where the libraries are named based on
where the sources live. A similar process could work in the
Achilleas Margaritis axil...@gmail.com writes:
I have a idea for automatic generation of headers in a c++ program.
Having to maintain headers is a very time consuming task, and I think
we will all benefit from such a thing. The idea is the following:
Each time the compiler finds the pragma
On 01/12/2011 09:17 AM, David Paterson wrote:
Hi all,
I'm in the early stages of a Leon-based project, and have been trying to put
together a cross toolchain for it. I'm having some problems getting it
configured and working correctly, and this proposed option would very likely
help me a
* Ian Lance Taylor:
Bill Cox waywardg...@gmail.com writes:
$ gcc myprog.c -lgit://github/~waywardgeek/sonic=0.1
In Go we have a program goinstall which looks at import statements and
pulls in required libraries, where the libraries are named based on
where the sources live. A similar
2011/1/7 Chung-Lin Tang clt...@codesourcery.com:
I analyzed this testcase regression a while earlier; the direct cause of
this is due to mips_order_regs_for_local_alloc(), which now serves as
MIPS' ADJUST_REG_ALLOC_ORDER macro.
The mips_order_regs_for_local_alloc() function seems to be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47265
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Error: SSA name in freelist but still
referenced
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47260
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47266
Summary: Optimization: Declare PRIVATE module procedures as
TREE_PUBLIC = 0 (static function)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46710
Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|major
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47267
Summary: array constructor causing long compile times
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47267
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47260
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
reconfirmed||2011.01.12 10:24:01
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12 10:24:01
UTC ---
Confirmed with gcc (GCC) 4.6.0 20110112 (experimental).
Thanks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47268
Summary: Documentation: missing (Optional) keyword for
parameters of get_command_argument() and
get_environment_variable()
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33033
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
Ian Bolton ibolton at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47233
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
10:39:43 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Wed Jan 12 10:39:39 2011
New Revision: 168700
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168700
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42371
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org |mjambor at suse
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
--- Comment #12 from Ian Bolton ibolton at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
10:44:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Created attachment 22945 [details]
Test patch
Could you try the following? It's a variant of a patch Richard Sandiford
recently
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47233
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33033
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
10:52:28 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Jan 12 10:52:25 2011
New Revision: 168701
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168701
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33033
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
10:53:24 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Jan 12 10:53:21 2011
New Revision: 168702
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168702
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33033
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
10:54:01 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Jan 12 10:53:59 2011
New Revision: 168703
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168703
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33033
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
10:54:38 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Jan 12 10:54:36 2011
New Revision: 168704
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168704
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33033
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47264
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47255
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46710
--- Comment #3 from Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12 11:22:35
UTC ---
I just noticed that this failure was reported on 9 January 2011, but it is no
longer reported on 10 January 2011. What changed ?
I asked Matthias Klose if he
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46993
--- Comment #1 from Arseny Klimovsky arseny.klimovsky at gmail dot com
2011-01-12 11:59:13 UTC ---
This bug is quite similar to another one in Debian BTS
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=561611
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47246
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47264
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
12:04:45 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 12 12:04:39 2011
New Revision: 168708
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168708
Log:
2011-01-12 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46894
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-apple-darwin9 |powerpc-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46946
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
12:07:49 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 12 12:07:44 2011
New Revision: 168709
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168709
Log:
2011-01-12 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46946
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47264
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47239
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47216
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-01-12 13:10:07 UTC ---
For example, linux uses global reg var esp. As there is no need to reserve
this register, can GCC accept it?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
13:32:32 UTC ---
In 99.% of all cases there is a better way than using a global register
variable.
Also it is not clear to me how to merge translation units where a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47260
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
13:37:53 UTC ---
Kai sent a draft patch. The issue is that TREE_PUBLIC/TREE_EXTERNAL should come
before setting the attribute - otherwise the decl seems to be inconsistent.
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37273
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com 2011-01-12 13:38:20
UTC ---
First I think we need to note that if we allocate the pseudo holding the value
for ext in memory that we get some savings (because ext is already sitting
in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823
--- Comment #18 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
13:50:11 UTC ---
You're right, however in fact all redirections and updates should be
taking place already. Either in inline_transform() for calls that are
in the function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47267
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47260
--- Comment #6 from Craig Powers craig.powers at gmail dot com 2011-01-12
14:11:28 UTC ---
I also was unable to get the procedure into a DLL with omission of DLLEXPORT,
instead attempting to get it in using a .DEF file and either gfortran or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47265
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46037
--- Comment #25 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-01-12
15:00:11 UTC ---
Testresults for lto-bootstrap with revised patch on x86_64-apple-darwin10...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-01/msg01002.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
15:01:16 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 12 15:01:09 2011
New Revision: 168713
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168713
Log:
2011-01-12 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47269
Summary: DSYMUTIL_SPEC doesn't handle -gtoggle
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
15:22:08 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 12 15:21:59 2011
New Revision: 168715
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168715
Log:
2011-01-12 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47270
Summary: [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] GCC produces
unnecessary/wrong code on -O2 and -O3 levels
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47244
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
15:47:36 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Wed Jan 12 15:47:29 2011
New Revision: 168717
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168717
Log:
PR driver/47244
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47244
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11750
Balakrishnan B balakrishnan.erode at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47209
--- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12 17:02:51
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Jan 12 17:02:41 2011
New Revision: 168718
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168718
Log:
2011-01-12 Kai Tietz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47209
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11750
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
17:10:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
With the same object when accessed directly produces different results and
when
accessed using a pointer of same type produces
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11750
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Schepler aschepler at gmail dot com 2011-01-12
17:16:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
struct A {
virtual void f();
};
struct B : virtual A {
virtual void f();
};
struct C : B , virtual A {
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47265
Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47271
Summary: gcc-4.6 -O1 -ftree-vectorize removes a test (if), the
function generates invalid outputs
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47271
--- Comment #1 from Victor Stinner victor.stinner at haypocalc dot com
2011-01-12 18:54:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 22951
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22951
Example to reproduce the bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46941
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47271
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-01-12 19:42:38
UTC ---
It is caused by revision 160030:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-05/msg01089.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47271
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spop at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47240
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12 20:00:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
[macbook] f90/bug% gfc -O2 pr35971_red.f90
pr35971_red.f90: In function 'gp':
pr35971_red.f90:67:0: error: non-trivial conversion at assignment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47272
Summary: In addition to the bug uncovered in 42751, gcc can't
bootstrap using --with-cpu=power7
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47240
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-01-12 20:59:31 UTC ---
sorry, I can not reproduce this at r168655 (plus patch from comment #7), at
least not on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Do you only get this error with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47147
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
21:17:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 22952
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22952
preprocessed source
configured with
../gcc-4.6-20110108/configure
reconfirmed||2011.01.12 21:21:12
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail||4.6.0
--- Comment #1 from Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12 21:21:12
UTC ---
Yes, confirmed with gcc version 4.6.0 20110112
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47271
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47147
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
21:34:13 UTC ---
./gcc/include/stddef.h is being included, but it doesn't define size_t
machine/ansi.h has the header guard _X86_64_ANSI_H_ but it appears that gcc's
stddef.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47147
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47240
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
21:49:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
pr35971_red.f90:67:0: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed
I can reproduce this with a clean trunk on x86-64-linux with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47272
Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47272
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12
21:54:25 UTC ---
Note, the fixes for 47251 will be needed in addition to changes for this bug in
order to do a full bootstrap on a power7 system using the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47240
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-01-12 22:18:35 UTC ---
I can reproduce this with a clean trunk on x86-64-linux with both -m32 and
-m64.
I confirm that the ICE is not due to the patch.
Regarding the
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
