Hi,
I noticed that GCC converts short arithmetic to unsigned short.
short foo2 (short a, short b)
{
return a - b;
}
In .gimple file:
foo2 (short int a, short int b)
{
short int D.3347;
short unsigned int a.0;
short unsigned int b.1;
short unsigned int D.3350;
a.0 = (short unsigned
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Bingfeng Mei b...@broadcom.com wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that GCC converts short arithmetic to unsigned short.
short foo2 (short a, short b)
{
return a - b;
}
In .gimple file:
foo2 (short int a, short int b)
{
short int D.3347;
short unsigned int a.0;
On Jun 17, 2011, at 5:26 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Bingfeng Mei b...@broadcom.com wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that GCC converts short arithmetic to unsigned short.
short foo2 (short a, short b)
{
return a - b;
}
In .gimple file:
foo2 (short int a,
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Paul Koning paul_kon...@dell.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 2011, at 5:26 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Bingfeng Mei b...@broadcom.com wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that GCC converts short arithmetic to unsigned short.
short foo2 (short a,
Hi all,
I am quite confused about the difference between the above two options
in Makefile fragments.
They both seem to be doing the same thing which is to set the options to
build libgcc2 with.
The only thing that comes to mind is that LIBGCC2_CFLAGS only applies to
the main library and
What is the current state of supporting hardened operating systems
that default to -fpie/-fPIE/-pie in gcc trunk? Do those releases still use
their own patches for gcc or has all of those changes been committed to gcc
trunk?
If so, does anyone recall the specific commits? In particular, I am
Paulo J. Matos pocma...@gmail.com writes:
I am quite confused about the difference between the above two options
in Makefile fragments.
They both seem to be doing the same thing which is to set the options
to build libgcc2 with.
The only thing that comes to mind is that LIBGCC2_CFLAGS only
On 17/06/11 15:22, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
LIBGCC2_CFLAGS applies only to libgcc (all multilib versions of libgcc).
MULTILIB_EXTRA_OPTS applies to all target libraries (libstdc++, libjava,
libgo, etc.).
Thanks for clearing that up for me. Since I am focused on the C frontend
only I actually
Jack Howarth howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu writes:
What is the current state of supporting hardened operating systems
that default to -fpie/-fPIE/-pie in gcc trunk? Do those releases still use
their own patches for gcc or has all of those changes been committed to gcc
trunk?
If so, does
Hi,
There are some flags that are needed by the target to build libgcc2. I
am keeping those in TARGET_LIBGCC2_FLAGS. However, compilation is failed
even before the building begins because configure fails. While trying to
compile test programs configure is using TARGET_LIBGCC2_FLAGS.
This
I am looking at an internally reported bug against 4.6 that starts
with something like this:
$ cat a.cc
int bar(int);
struct B {
B(int);
~B() __attribute__((noreturn));
};
int foo(void)
{
B::B f(10);
return 0;
}
int bar(int j)
{
B(10);
}
$ ./cc1plus -Wall -Werror a.cc
int foo()
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 14:47, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
if (flag_syntax_only || flag_wpa)
return;
to
if (flag_syntax_only || flag_wpa || errorcount 0)
return;
To clarify. It would be 'seen_error ()' instead of 'errorcount 0',
but the idea is the same.
Diego.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 07:30:43AM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Jack Howarth howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu writes:
What is the current state of supporting hardened operating systems
that default to -fpie/-fPIE/-pie in gcc trunk? Do those releases still use
their own patches for gcc or
On 06/17/2011 10:55 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 14:47, Diego Novillodnovi...@google.com wrote:
if (flag_syntax_only || flag_wpa)
return;
to
if (flag_syntax_only || flag_wpa || errorcount 0)
return;
To clarify. It would be 'seen_error ()' instead of
In GCC 3.3.3, I had a typedef with attribute((mode(byte))) on it. That worked
(the resulting type had size 1).
In GCC 4.5.1, this no longer works; the attribute is silently ignored. It does
work when used on a variable declaration directly, but for the many lines of
code that relied on the
Why aren't the BOOT_LDFLAGS settings honored outside of the gcc build
subdirectory?
On darwin, we are now setting...
BOOT_LDFLAGS += `case ${host} in *-*-darwin[1][1-9]*) echo -Wl,-no_pie ;; esac;`
in config/mh-darwin, and while the generated toplevel Makefile shows...
On 06/17/2011 08:54 AM, Paul Koning wrote:
In GCC 3.3.3, I had a typedef with attribute((mode(byte))) on it. That
worked (the resulting type had size 1).
In GCC 4.5.1, this no longer works; the attribute is silently ignored.
It certainly does work. libgcc relies on it.
You'll have to
On Jun 17, 2011, at 2:15 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 06/17/2011 08:54 AM, Paul Koning wrote:
In GCC 3.3.3, I had a typedef with attribute((mode(byte))) on it. That
worked (the resulting type had size 1).
In GCC 4.5.1, this no longer works; the attribute is silently ignored.
It
make[5]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
makeinfo --split-size=500 --split-size=500
--split-size=500 -I ../.././libgomp/../gcc/doc/include -I
../.././libgomp -o libgomp.info ../.././libgomp/libgomp.texi
/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile
Is there a good technical reason why thumb prologue is
still in text, not rtl?
This is, unfortunately, the only dwarf2-capable target
that outputs anything substantial in the prologue that
has actually been updated to handle dwarf2 cfi info.
If I tried to convert it to rtl, what obstacles would
Snapshot gcc-4.6-20110617 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.6-20110617/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.6 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
Paulo J. Matos pocma...@gmail.com writes:
There are some flags that are needed by the target to build libgcc2. I
am keeping those in TARGET_LIBGCC2_FLAGS. However, compilation is
failed even before the building begins because configure fails. While
trying to compile test programs configure is
Jack Howarth howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu writes:
Why aren't the BOOT_LDFLAGS settings honored outside of the gcc build
subdirectory?
On darwin, we are now setting...
BOOT_LDFLAGS += `case ${host} in *-*-darwin[1][1-9]*) echo -Wl,-no_pie ;;
esac;`
in config/mh-darwin, and while the
Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz gryz...@gmail.com writes:
/Users/gj/Projects/gcc/gcc-4.6-20110610/host-x86_64-apple-darwin10.7.4/gcc/xgcc
-B/Users/gj/Projects/gcc/gcc-4.6-20110610/host-x86_64-apple-darwin10.7.4/gcc/
-B/usr/local/x86_64-apple-darwin10.7.4/bin/
-B/usr/local/x86_64-apple-darwin10.7.4/lib/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49324
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-17
06:11:35 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Jun 17 06:11:31 2011
New Revision: 175137
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175137
Log:
2011-06-17 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49431
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #30 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-06-17 07:07:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 24552
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24552
Make log for gcc-4_6-branch for comment 28
(In reply to comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49449
Summary: -fmudflapth -lmudflapth problems with
-fvisibility=hidden, missing posix_memalign wrapper
and pointers in varargs
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49448
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2011-06-17 07:26:12
UTC ---
It should use $target_cpu.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49442
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-17
08:15:38 UTC ---
ICC apparently has __assume_aligned (ptr, align) for this, and also
#pragma vector {aligned,unaligned,always,nontemporal}.
For alignment, I'd say having both
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
--- Comment #28 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-06-17 08:21:30 UTC ---
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, eraman at google dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
--- Comment #27 from Easwaran Raman
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49315
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-17 08:33:17 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Jun 17 08:33:13 2011
New Revision: 175138
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175138
Log:
PR libgcj/49315
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49315
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|alpha-dec-osf5.1b |alpha-dec-osf5.1b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47516
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49449
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fche at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49445
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49444
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-17
09:06:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Something like this:
Index: tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c
===
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49361
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49445
--- Comment #2 from Juan Pedro Bolívar Puente raskolnikov at gnu dot org
2011-06-17 09:35:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 24553
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24553
Test case for the undefined reference on atomfloat bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49314
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-17 09:56:50 UTC ---
As a quick hack, I've just removed the definition of HAVE_ICONV and
rebuilt libgcj.so. This way, testsuite results are clean.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835
--- Comment #14 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-06-17
10:02:21 UTC ---
Partial success: I've just managed to bootstrap gcc-4.1.2 w/ gnat on
m68k-linux. Lots of patches applied though.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49450
Summary: not possible to call explicit destructor of
std::string
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48542
--- Comment #10 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-17
11:13:42 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Fri Jun 17 11:13:38 2011
New Revision: 175139
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175139
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48542
--- Comment #11 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-17
11:15:39 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Fri Jun 17 11:15:35 2011
New Revision: 175140
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175140
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48542
--- Comment #12 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-17
11:17:37 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Fri Jun 17 11:17:34 2011
New Revision: 175141
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175141
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48542
--- Comment #13 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-17
11:18:39 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Fri Jun 17 11:18:37 2011
New Revision: 175142
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175142
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48542
--- Comment #14 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-17
11:20:05 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Fri Jun 17 11:20:01 2011
New Revision: 175144
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175144
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48542
--- Comment #15 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-17
11:20:41 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Fri Jun 17 11:20:38 2011
New Revision: 175145
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175145
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #22 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2011-06-17 11:21:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
Created attachment 24112 [details]
backported patch
Good. Then attached is the initial backport, I have just verified that it
passes the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48542
--- Comment #16 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-17
11:24:57 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Fri Jun 17 11:24:55 2011
New Revision: 175146
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175146
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48542
--- Comment #17 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-17
11:25:56 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Fri Jun 17 11:25:53 2011
New Revision: 175147
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175147
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49115
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-17
11:27:41 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jun 17 11:27:37 2011
New Revision: 175148
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175148
Log:
2011-06-17 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49450
--- Comment #1 from Johnny Willemsen jwillemsen at remedy dot nl 2011-06-17
11:32:51 UTC ---
g++-4.6 (SUSE Linux) 4.6.0 20110505 [gcc-4_6-branch revision 173419]
Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48542
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49445
Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49451
Summary: FileHandleGcTest FAILS on IRIX
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49452
Summary: New testsuite failures with arm-linux-gnueabi
comp-goto failing with
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49452
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-17
12:02:10 UTC ---
One of the differences I must say I noticed is that at O2 - the call to y has a
NORETURN attribute marked to it but there's no reason why this should
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49445
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2011-06-17
12:07:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
It looks like C++11 only defines atomicintegral and atomicT*, so a
link-time error on atomicfloat seems ok, no?
Sorry,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49441
--- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-06-17
12:50:52 UTC ---
How is gcj supposed to properly find its linkage libraries on x86_64 linux when
using -m32? Since only a single copy of libgcj.spec is installed and used
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49314
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-06-17
13:04:17 UTC ---
Could this pr be related to pr49441?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49441
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-06-17
13:05:33 UTC ---
PR49314 reports also problems with iconv and java.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49314
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-17 13:09:06 UTC ---
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-06-17 13:04:17 UTC ---
Could this pr be related to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49453
Summary: Accepts invalid syntax for partial specialization of
class template where the specialization is a class
template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.4
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48787
--- Comment #22 from Thomas Henlich thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net
2011-06-17 13:22:42 UTC ---
This is kind of bad:
print (RU,F7.0), 7500.0 ! 8. expected 7500.
print (RD,F7.0), -7500.0 ! -8. expected -7500.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36610
--- Comment #24 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-17 13:23:39 UTC ---
--- Comment #23 from Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
18:26:40 UTC ---
[...]
Summarizing, I would close the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36610
--- Comment #25 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-06-17 13:29:33 UTC ---
I have the following patch in my working tree without regression
--- /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/objc.dg/torture/forward-1.m2011-06-07
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48787
--- Comment #23 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-06-17 13:32:33 UTC ---
For 'gcc version 4.6.0 20110313 (experimental) [trunk revision 170921p5] (GCC)'
I get
7501.
-7501.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49450
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49450
Johnny Willemsen jwillemsen at remedy dot nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49383
William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wschmidt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49450
Johnny Willemsen jwillemsen at remedy dot nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49454
Summary: [4.7 Regression] /usr/include/libio.h:336:3: internal
compiler error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49455
Summary: Thread_Interrupt Looper subtest FAILs on IRIX
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49314
Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49456
Summary: getstacktrace and getallthreads tests timeout on IRIX
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #23 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2011-06-17 14:04:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #22)
(In reply to comment #20)
Created attachment 24112 [details]
backported patch
Good. Then attached is the initial backport, I have just
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49314
--- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-17 14:06:12 UTC ---
pr49441 is a totally different issue. That bug manifests itself as a runtime
error with unresolved symbols from libiconv. I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49445
--- Comment #5 from Juan Pedro Bolívar Puente raskolnikov at gnu dot org
2011-06-17 14:41:03 UTC ---
You are right, I thought it worked for all fundamental types but reviewing the
proposal [1] makes me realise I was wrong. It remains unclear
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #24 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-17
15:08:55 UTC ---
Thanks for reminder, I've started bootstap and test on ia64 and x86-64.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49383
--- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-17
15:53:39 UTC ---
We die on this assert:
gcc_assert (cgraph_function_or_thunk_node (node, NULL) == node);
Here's a couple of dumps of the two decls if that helps.
(gdb)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47606
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47606
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49314
--- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-17 16:15:55 UTC ---
Further investigation revealed part of what's going on: the test in
gnu::gcj::convert::IOConverter::iconv_init fails with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49444
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-17
16:25:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Well, that will then still run into the indirect-ref issue as
the expansion for target-mem-refs and mem-refs works the same way.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49452
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49452
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-17
16:55:48 UTC ---
I haven't looked at in great detail yet to analyse what causes this problem
but
it appears to have appeared in the last week or so.
Maybe r175063
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49457
Summary: integer comparison does not vectorize
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7970
David Hammen dhammen at odysseysr dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dhammen at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49458
Summary: [C++0x] Obvious candidate for conversion to function
lvalue rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49459
Summary: attribute((mode(byte))) in a typedef produces wrong
debug information
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49454
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49459
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49460
Summary: g++: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program
cc1plus) using -O2 or -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49460
--- Comment #1 from Roger Jarrett rjarrett at mathworks dot com 2011-06-17
19:41:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 24555
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24555
preprocessed source file SmartInliner.ii (gzipped)
preprocessed file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48699
--- Comment #18 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-17 20:03:07 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Fri Jun 17 20:03:04 2011
New Revision: 175151
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175151
Log:
2011-06-17 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43912
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-17
20:08:06 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 17 20:08:01 2011
New Revision: 175158
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175158
Log:
PR c++/43912
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
