On 21/09/2011 16:57, Paulo J. Matos wrote:
On 21/09/11 15:21, David Brown wrote:
And since this
situation would not occur in real code (at least, not code that is
expected to do something useful other than test the compiler's code
generation), there is no harm in making sub-optimal object code.
On 21/09/2011 20:50, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
David Brown schrieb:
On 21/09/2011 15:57, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
David Brownda...@westcontrol.com writes:
On 21/09/2011 10:21, Paulo J. Matos wrote:
On 21/09/11 08:03, David Brown wrote:
Asking to read it by a volatile read does not
change
Hello,
I configured my gcc with --disable-tls for arm-none-eabi. But it can
still successfully compile the below case:
__thread int i;
int f (void) { return i; }
void main (int j) { i = j; }
The dg-require-effective-target tls use this case to check whether
target supports
Vertebrate fertile bluff me to ford, as gait did something which. This
aristocracy Rakitin lamented to puffer in a disperse. Clove accomplished
poetic, looking kindly invasion with the efficacy of persons bracelet
festered some regardless fleshy dogma whisker had joyous herd of keeping
Romain Geissler romain.geiss...@gmail.com a écrit:
I tried to fix PLUGIN_FINISH_DECL as well to include typedefs in C++.
The followings does not currently trigger the PLUGIN_FINISH_DECL
(or not in all cases), but should them ?
- function parameters (in the function prototype)
- definition
On 11-09-22 09:40 , Dodji Seketeli wrote:
Romain Geisslerromain.geiss...@gmail.com a écrit:
I tried to fix PLUGIN_FINISH_DECL as well to include typedefs in C++.
The followings does not currently trigger the PLUGIN_FINISH_DECL
(or not in all cases), but should them ?
- function parameters
Le 22 sept. 2011 à 16:18, Diego Novillo a écrit :
On 11-09-22 09:40 , Dodji Seketeli wrote:
Romain Geisslerromain.geiss...@gmail.com a écrit:
I tried to fix PLUGIN_FINISH_DECL as well to include typedefs in C++.
The followings does not currently trigger the PLUGIN_FINISH_DECL
(or not
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:58:51AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
I spent a little time today looking at why shrink wrap is failing to
help on PowerPC, and it turns out that the optimization simply doesn't
trigger that often due to prologue clobbered regs. PowerPC uses r0 as
a temp in the prologue
On 09/22/11 16:40, Alan Modra wrote:
The bootstrap breakage happens on libmudflap/mf-hooks1.c, compiling
__wrap_malloc. Eliding some detail, this function starts off as
void *__wrap_malloc (size_t c)
{
if (__mf_starting_p)
return __real_malloc (c);
The if is bb2, the sibling call
Terry Guo flame...@gmail.com writes:
I configured my gcc with --disable-tls for arm-none-eabi. But it can
still successfully compile the below case:
__thread int i;
int f (void) { return i; }
void main (int j) { i = j; }
The dg-require-effective-target tls use this case
Hi,
After the discussion about the use of CCmode in:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-07/msg00303.html
I am trying to ditch support for the only cc0 attr and add support for
CC_REG.
There are two issues that are making the situation more complicated,
both of similar nature.
My addition
On 09/22/2011 07:47 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
dwarf2cfi should be able to figure this out. I'd need to see RTL dumps
to get an idea what's going on.
Indeed. Please CC me, Alan.
r~
On 09/09/11 09:09:30, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
[...] What is the status of lra, reload-2a, pph,
cilkplus, gupc (I assume at least some of these are 4.8+ material)?
For GUPC, we are targeting GCC 4.8.
thanks,
- Gary
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Paulo J. Matos pa...@matos-sorge.com wrote:
On 21/09/11 15:21, David Brown wrote:
And since this
situation would not occur in real code (at least, not code that is
expected to do something useful other than test the compiler's code
generation), there is no
Snapshot gcc-4.5-20110922 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5-20110922/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011, Diego Novillo wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 04:31, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it would be more useful to have a script parse gcc-testresults@
postings from the various autotesters and produce a nice webpage
with revisions and known
At Google, we've found that the cost of linking applications with
debug info is much too high. A large C++ application that might be,
say, 200MB without debug info, is somewhere around 1GB with debug
info, and the total size of the object files that we send to the
linker is around 5GB (and that's
Hi Cary, just one quick clarification -
On Sep 22, 2011, at 5:21 PM, Cary Coutant wrote:
Previous Implementations of Separate Debug Information
==
In the Sun and HP implementations, the debug information in the
relocatable objects still
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Jason Molenda jmole...@apple.com wrote:
Because the linker doesn't need to copy around/update/modify the DWARF,
link times are very fast.
AFAIU, the link times are fast only if all the files are local to the
developers' machine.
They will not be fast (and the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50478
Bug #: 50478
Summary: Internal compiler error when using initializer lists
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47855
--- Comment #4 from jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22 06:41:49 UTC ---
Author: jye2
Date: Thu Sep 22 06:41:44 2011
New Revision: 179077
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179077
Log:
2011-09-22 Joey Ye joey...@arm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50478
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50451
--- Comment #5 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22 07:21:14 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Thu Sep 22 07:21:07 2011
New Revision: 179079
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179079
Log:
PR tree-optimization/50451
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50451
Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50374
--- Comment #18 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-09-22 07:51:35 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #16)
and -3.c fails with an ICE in the vectorizer, Ira,
could you look at that?
--- tree-vect-stmts.c 2011-09-22 09:48:34.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50479
Bug #: 50479
Summary: Unevaluated usage of parameters in function default
arguments is accepted
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50380
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-09-22
08:51:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 25335
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25335
reduced test case
Much reduced test case. So far I've only been able to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
--- Comment #27 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2011-09-22
09:25:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #25)
[builtins to reverse the bit order]
I think a separate Bugzilla requesting as an enhancement such intrinsics would
be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41733
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22 09:32:14 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Thu Sep 22 09:32:11 2011
New Revision: 179080
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179080
Log:
2011-09-22 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50478
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #52 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22 09:34:49
UTC ---
Created attachment 25336
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25336
remove ranlib special casing from the darwin port
so, this has taken a long
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41733
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
--- Comment #28 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-09-22
09:49:18 UTC ---
I think we should. Can you do that? Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50478
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50465
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22
09:55:20 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Sep 22 09:55:13 2011
New Revision: 179081
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179081
Log:
PR target/50447
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50447
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22
09:55:21 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Sep 22 09:55:13 2011
New Revision: 179081
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179081
Log:
PR target/50447
PR
Hello,
I'm building a toolchain in /opt dir. I have already build and installed
glibc-2.14 and binutils-2.21.1a in /opt.
Now I want to build and install gcc-4.6.1 with gmp, mpfr and mpc also in
/opt.
Here is my configure:
../gcc-4.6.1/configure --prefix=/tools --disable-nls --disable-shared
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50480
Bug #: 50480
Summary: 10% performance regression on Spec2006 410.bwaves
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50480
--- Comment #1 from Yukhin Kirill kirill.yukhin at intel dot com 2011-09-22
10:00:34 UTC ---
Checkin URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177368
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35860
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50481
Bug #: 50481
Summary: builtin to reverse the bit order
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
--- Comment #29 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2011-09-22
10:29:07 UTC ---
See Bug 50481 about bit-reversal builtins (and feel free to add details there).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50480
--- Comment #2 from Yukhin Kirill kirill.yukhin at intel dot com 2011-09-22
10:33:06 UTC ---
Here is optset details:
base=-static -O2 -ffast-math (-m32 -msse2 -mfpmath=sse if 32 bit mode)
peak=-static -O3 -funroll-loops -ffast-math (-m32 -msse2
--no-recursion
Thread model: win32
gcc version 4.7.0 20110922 (experimental) (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-D' 'HAVE_MKSTEMP' '-D' 'HAVE_FONTCONFIG' '-D'
'HAVE_LIBIDN' '-D' 'HAVE_SETLOCALE' '-D' 'HAVE_DBUS' '-D' 'HAVE_BSWAP32' '-D'
'HAVE_BYTESWAP_H' '-O4' '-mfpmath=sse' '-march=native' '-mtune=native' '-g
re http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2011-09/msg01506.html
This mailing list is for automated emails from our bug database,
people don't use it for discussions via email.
To report a bug please use bugzilla, using the instructions at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/
To ask for help using or building GCC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #53 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22 10:51:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #52)
Created attachment 25336 [details]
remove ranlib special casing from the darwin port
[...]
I would appreciate some help with testing on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #54 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22 11:01:05
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #53)
(In reply to comment #52)
Created attachment 25336 [details]
remove ranlib special casing from the darwin port
[...]
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50348
vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50483
Bug #: 50483
Summary: lto turns visibility from HIDDEN to DEFAULT
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: lto
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50348
--- Comment #4 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-09-22 11:23:14
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
I think that, unless not imposed by the standard (why??) the visibility of
namespace std SHALL NOT BE forced to default
part of the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50484
Bug #: 50484
Summary: [4.6 regression] ia64-portbld-freebsd9.0,
conftest.c:16:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation
fault: 11
Classification: Unclassified
Product:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50484
--- Comment #1 from Anton Shterenlikht mexas at bristol dot ac.uk 2011-09-22
11:27:26 UTC ---
Created attachment 25338
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25338
config.log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50348
--- Comment #5 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2011-09-22 11:49:29 UTC ---
indeed
and in exception header-file is a place where visibility is correctly handled
#pragma GCC visibility push(default)
extern C++ {
namespace
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50485
Bug #: 50485
Summary: gcc.target/i386/sse4_1-blendps.c fails spuriously on
i686
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50482
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50485
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22 12:25:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 25339
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25339
proprocessed sse4_1-blendps.c with patch applied to make failure reproducible
To reproduce:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50113
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-22 12:26:48 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu Sep 22 12:26:41 2011
New Revision: 179085
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179085
Log:
gcc/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50348
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22
12:26:56 UTC ---
dup of PR 36022 ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50061
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-22 12:26:48 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu Sep 22 12:26:41 2011
New Revision: 179085
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179085
Log:
gcc/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50348
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-09-22
13:23:41 UTC ---
Seems so, thanks Jon. The older one also includes some rationale from Benjamin.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
--- Comment #30 from Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé de...@the-user.org 2011-09-22
13:39:22 UTC ---
Sorry, thank you for creating the feature-request.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50348
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22
13:45:10 UTC ---
I think before the default visibility was added everywhere it was pretty easy
to cause segfaults by using -fvisibility=hidden
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50344
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-22 14:16:33 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Sep 22 14:16:27 2011
New Revision: 179088
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179088
Log:
/cp
2011-09-22
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50344
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50430
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22
14:20:07 UTC ---
Created attachment 25340
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25340
reduced testcase
This is somewhat reduced testcase. The problem can be a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50486
Bug #: 50486
Summary: No warning at signed - unsigned casting
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50348
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36022
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-09-22
14:42:38 UTC ---
*** Bug 50348 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50481
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50486
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50374
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25333|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45810
--- Comment #26 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-09-22 15:25:48 UTC ---
AFAICT this pr has been fixed since some time. Here are the results I get on
x86_64-apple-darwin10 (Core2Duo 2.53Ghz, 3Mb cache, 4Gb RAM) at revision
-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc-fsf-4.7
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/sw/lib/gcc4.7/libexec/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin11.2.0/4.7.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin11.2.0
Configured with: ../gcc-4.7-20110922/configure --prefix=/sw
--prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.7 --mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc4.7/info
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50374
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22
15:52:11 UTC ---
The reason why many of the loops in *-12.c aren't vectorized is that for
idxtype other than unsigned int which is the type of i there is a cast from i
to the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50482
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22
16:24:34 UTC ---
Sorry for that, yeah, the patch looks right.
BTW, for CONST_VECTOR containing all bits set we could do better,
for VEC_COND_EXPR x y ? -1 : z we can do mask =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50482
--- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-09-22 16:27:01
UTC ---
Shorter testcase:
void
test (int code, unsigned int * image, int * colors)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i code; ++i)
image[i] = (colors[i] 0 ? ~(unsigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50482
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22
16:33:27 UTC ---
unsigned short a[1024], b[1024];
void
foo (void)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i 1024; i++)
a[i] = b[i] 10 ? b[i] : 0x;
}
ICEs too with -O3 -msse4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50482
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22
17:02:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 25342
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25342
gcc47-all-ones-cst.patch
Patch to optimize vector x y ? -1 : z and vector
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50473
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50437
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50371
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50487
Bug #: 50487
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50055
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50482
--- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22 17:35:06 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Sep 22 17:35:00 2011
New Revision: 179094
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179094
Log:
PR target/50482
* config/i386/i386.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49527
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50464
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22 17:41:30 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Sep 22 17:41:25 2011
New Revision: 179095
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179095
Log:
PR target/50464
* config/i386/sse.md
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49447
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50488
Bug #: 50488
Summary: Destructor problem in struct
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50488
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50487
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47627
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47436
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Variadic|[C++0x]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50488
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22
18:11:03 UTC ---
Also I think he forgot about copy constructor happening.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47436
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2011-09-22 18:11:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Suggestions about a better error message? (should be easy to change)
What about:
error: every valid template
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50488
--- Comment #3 from karman inexinferis at hotmail dot com 2011-09-22 18:12:18
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
you have two problems, one is that the code won't compile because you're
missing a header, the second is that GCC 3.4.5 is ancient,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50487
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libfortran |testsuite
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50487
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2011-09-22 18:19:07 UTC ---
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 06:16:35PM +, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50487
H.J. Lu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50371
--- Comment #1 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-22 18:20:58 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Sep 22 18:20:53 2011
New Revision: 179096
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179096
Log:
/cp
2011-09-22
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50371
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50487
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-09-22 18:22:25
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
It works for me. Can you check it in?
Sure, do you want me to apply it to 4.5 and 4.6 as well.
Yes, please.
1 - 100 of 219 matches
Mail list logo
