From: Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 09:22:51 +0100
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 11:41:08PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
--- a/libgcc/configure.ac
+++ b/libgcc/configure.ac
@@ -255,11 +255,12 @@ AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether assembler supports CFI
directives], [libgcc_cv_cfi],
Joel,
That's what my patch does. It would be good if Joel could test on
i386-rtems before comitting (as I will on Solaris/SPARC and x86, of
course).
i386-rtems builds fine after moving the files.
From my perspective, you can commit.
Thanks for the confirmation. I've run
I propose myself as maintainer of the Epiphany port.
This port is currently being submitted / reviewed on the gcc-patches
mailing list.
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
Is it possible to make sure that the LABELX occurs right
after the Call some_function instruction (and the instruction
scheduler moves the label with the call INSN)? I insert the
label right after the call is expanded and LABELX is being moved
above
Hi,
I am testing powerpc-rtems on the head and
have gotten a weird error compiling libgcc.
It is definitely a regression from 4.6.
I have no idea who might be the best person
to help resolve this.
/home2/joel/build/b-powerpc-gcc/powerpc-rtems4.11/libgcc
[joel@rtbf64a libgcc]$ make
Hello Everyone,
I am getting a bootstrap failure right now when I try to build GCC.
Here is the output. Can someone please tell me how to fix this? Is this
something I have modified? I just configured using the following command
(../gcc/configure -prefix=INSTALL_DIR). I haven't modified
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/04/11 12:34, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
Hello Everyone, I am getting a bootstrap failure right now when I
try to build GCC. Here is the output. Can someone please tell me
how to fix this? Is this something I have modified? I just
configured using
Greetings,
Now that C++11 user-defined literals are in trunk I was thinking about
reclaiming some of the numeric suffixes that are currently recognized by gcc in
the preprocessor. The C++11 spec stipulates that any suffix that is recognized
by the implementation is not allowable as a
97
# of unexpected successes1
# of expected failures161
# of unsupported tests446
=
4.7.0 2004
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-11/msg00440.html
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes71190
# of unexpected
Thanks Jeff for your help!
So, are the errors confined to these files? Or could it be anywhere?
Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning: gcc/cc1obj-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs
Bootstrap comparison failure!
gcc/i386-common.o differs
On 11/04/11 15:37, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
Is it possible to make sure that the LABELX occurs right
after the Call some_function instruction (and the instruction
scheduler moves the label with the call INSN)? I insert the
label right after the call
Since it looks like a lot of the failures
in both cases are lto, vect and stack-align
tests, I suspect that of the ~3100 tests
that were added, we have a number of new
tests that won't work on when compiling
specifically for an erc32 (-mcpu=cypress).
The results can hardly be analyzed,
--enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --libexecdir=/usr/lib --enu-as
--with-dwarf2 --disable-sjlj-exceptions
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,jble-libjava --program-suffix=-4
--enable-libgomp --enable-libssp --enable-threadRGET=gcc-4
CXX_FOR_TARGET=g++-4
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 2004
Snapshot gcc-4.6-2004 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.6-2004/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.6 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
For example, rx-elf...
gcc/function.c: In function 'thread_prologue_and_epilogue_insns':
gcc/regs.h:322:34: error: array subscript is above array bounds
[-Werror=array-bounds]
function.c has this:
if (pic_offset_table_rtx)
add_to_hard_reg_set (set_up_by_prologue, Pmode,
DJ Delorie d...@redhat.com writes:
gcc/function.c: In function 'thread_prologue_and_epilogue_insns':
gcc/regs.h:322:34: error: array subscript is above array bounds
[-Werror=array-bounds]
function.c has this:
if (pic_offset_table_rtx)
add_to_hard_reg_set (set_up_by_prologue,
if (pic_offset_table_rtx)
add_to_hard_reg_set (set_up_by_prologue, Pmode,
PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM);
But if PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM == INVALID_REGNUM, then
pic_offset_table_rtx should be NULL_RTX.
It is, but is gcc smart enough to know that causal
DJ Delorie d...@redhat.com writes:
if (pic_offset_table_rtx)
add_to_hard_reg_set (set_up_by_prologue, Pmode,
PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM);
But if PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM == INVALID_REGNUM, then
pic_offset_table_rtx should be NULL_RTX.
It is, but is gcc smart
Does it help if we change
if (pic_offset_table_rtx)
to
if (PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM != INVALID_REGNUM)
That seems to work.
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 6:01 PM, DJ Delorie d...@redhat.com wrote:
if (pic_offset_table_rtx)
add_to_hard_reg_set (set_up_by_prologue, Pmode,
PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM);
But if PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM == INVALID_REGNUM, then
pic_offset_table_rtx should be
From: Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 09:22:51 +0100
I think much better would be to handle sparc*/s390*/powerpc* differently
here, just using #ifdef __LP64__ test. i?86/x86_64 is different because
of the third weirdo multilib option.
I just tested and committed the
DJ Delorie d...@redhat.com writes:
Does it help if we change
if (pic_offset_table_rtx)
to
if (PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM != INVALID_REGNUM)
That seems to work.
That patch is fine if it bootstraps.
Ian
Quoting Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com:
(define_predicate call_address_operand
(match_code symbol_ref,const,reg)
{
return (symbolic_operand (op, mode) || (GET_CODE (op) == REG));
})
Nit.
(define_predicate call_address_operand
(ior (match_code reg)
(match_operand 0
On 11/04/2011 09:01 PM, Joern Rennecke wrote:
Is there a way to have a predicate forward declaration?
No, sadly. Something for a future enhancement in the genfoo.
r~
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50982
--- Comment #13 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04
14:59:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 25713
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25713
AIX include-fixed sys/types.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50982
--- Comment #14 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04
14:59:50 UTC ---
AIX /usr/include/sys/types.h refers to pthread_once_t
typedef struct
{
#ifdef __64BIT__
long__on_word[9];
#else
int __on_word[28];
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50992
--- Comment #2 from Alexander bratsinot at gmail dot com 2011-11-04 14:59:53
UTC ---
Created attachment 25714
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25714
NULL
I right now noticed that abs() just return real part of complex number.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50992
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50982
--- Comment #15 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-11-04 15:10:06 UTC ---
--- Comment #14 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04
14:59:50 UTC ---
AIX /usr/include/sys/types.h refers
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50992
Alexander bratsinot at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Wconversion does not handle |abs() and cabs()
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50982
--- Comment #16 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04
15:12:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 25715
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25715
Pre-processed atomic.cc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50992
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50980
--- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04 15:22:11
UTC ---
Author: joel
Date: Fri Nov 4 15:22:06 2011
New Revision: 180959
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180959
Log:
2011-11-04Thomas Doerfler
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50992
Alexander bratsinot at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|enhancement |normal
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50980
Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50991
--- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-11-04 15:24:50 UTC ---
On 11/4/2011 10:32 AM, bonzini at gnu dot org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50991
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Bonzinibonzini at gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50992
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50569
--- Comment #7 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-11-04
15:31:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 25716
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25716
reduced test case
This reduced test case causes an alignment fault when
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50982
--- Comment #17 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04
16:10:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 25717
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25717
Pre-processed atomic.cc that compiles
The incorrect version of atomic.ii
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50982
--- Comment #18 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04
16:12:27 UTC ---
The first atomic.ii is from the failing revision 180821. The second one is
from the successful revision 180770 before the libgcc changes.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50725
gee jojelino at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25493|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50941
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04
16:16:18 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Nov 4 16:16:09 2011
New Revision: 180961
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180961
Log:
PR c++/50941
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50725
--- Comment #12 from gee jojelino at gmail dot com 2011-11-04 16:16:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 25719
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25719
generated rtl with pr50725
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50931
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04
16:20:28 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Fri Nov 4 16:20:18 2011
New Revision: 180962
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180962
Log:
gcc/
PR target/50931
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50015
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04
16:26:11 UTC ---
I verified that my patch for 48370 also fixes this testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50941
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50982
--- Comment #19 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-11-04 16:30:57 UTC ---
The incorrect version of atomic.ii includes more code, but nothing specific to
pthread_once_t. I still am trying to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48420
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-04 16:31:23 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Nov 4 16:31:18 2011
New Revision: 180963
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180963
Log:
/cp
2011-11-04
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48420
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #59 from jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04 16:50:11 UTC ---
Author: jye2
Date: Fri Nov 4 16:50:04 2011
New Revision: 180964
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180964
Log:
2011-11-04 Jiangning Liu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|avr-rtems4.11 |avr-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04
17:12:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 25720
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25720
size-compared.txt
This is a size comparison where objects of same name are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50965
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04
17:15:14 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Nov 4 17:15:02 2011
New Revision: 180965
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180965
Log:
PR c++/50965
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50965
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50693
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50982
--- Comment #20 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04
17:29:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 25722
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25722
rev 180821 atomic.ii from save-temps
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50982
--- Comment #21 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04
17:33:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 25723
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25723
rev 180770 atomic.ii from save-temps
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50982
--- Comment #22 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04
17:36:52 UTC ---
diff -u atomic.ii.save-temps.old atomic.ii.save-temps.new
-#define __VERSION__ 4.7.0 2002 (experimental) [trunk revision 180770]
+#define __VERSION__
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50979
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04
17:38:34 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Nov 4 17:38:29 2011
New Revision: 180968
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180968
Log:
PR target/50979
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50979
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04
17:37:09 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Nov 4 17:37:03 2011
New Revision: 180966
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180966
Log:
PR target/50979
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50979
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04
17:39:23 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Nov 4 17:39:15 2011
New Revision: 180969
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180969
Log:
PR target/50979
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50979
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49965
--- Comment #17 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04 20:26:07 UTC ---
Author: davem
Date: Fri Nov 4 20:25:59 2011
New Revision: 180982
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180982
Log:
Fix sparc regression due to recent movcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50100
Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50569
Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906
--- Comment #14 from Kyle Moffett Kyle.D.Moffett at boeing dot com 2011-11-04
21:20:18 UTC ---
I'm now rebuilding the Debian GCC 4.6.2-4 (which now includes the other 2
patches I mentioned previously) with the updated 4.6 patch, I'll let you know
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50608
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04
21:46:10 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Nov 4 21:46:07 2011
New Revision: 180986
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180986
Log:
2011-11-04 Eric
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50608
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04
21:49:52 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Nov 4 21:49:49 2011
New Revision: 180988
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180988
Log:
2011-11-04 Eric
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50608
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |other
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50991
--- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-11-04 22:30:12 UTC ---
On 4-Nov-11, at 10:32 AM, bonzini at gnu dot org wrote:
John didn't say that but you're right, because otherwise the move-if-
change
would not have happened. John,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50952
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2011-11-04 23:01:13 UTC ---
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 05:57:15AM +, markus at trippelsdorf dot de wrote:
Anyone know how to fix this issue properly?
Yes, just
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50994
Bug #: 50994
Summary: wanted: interface for querying cache size
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50994
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04
23:12:51 UTC ---
The cache block/line size could be different on two different machines so it
cannot be constant. Also there is no portable way of figuring out the cache
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17310
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44128
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48370
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-05
03:28:09 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Nov 5 03:28:05 2011
New Revision: 181001
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181001
Log:
PR c++/48370
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26714
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-05
03:28:18 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Nov 5 03:28:14 2011
New Revision: 181002
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181002
Log:
PR c++/26714
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26714
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44128
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
/ccZPl6Qi.s
[New Thread 804.0xc28]
warning: section .gnu_debuglink not found in /cygdrive/d/cygwin/bin/cygwin1.dbg
[New Thread 804.0xc44]
GNU C (GCC) version 4.7.0 2004 (experimental) (i686-pc-cygwin)
compiled by GNU C version 4.7.0 20111025 (experimental), GMP version
5.0.2, MPFR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50894
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50880
--- Comment #26 from Richard B. Kreckel kreckel at ginac dot de 2011-11-04
08:17:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #25)
By the way, if isn't clear already, I would be *really* curious to know which
specific targets by now can't just enable the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598
--- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04 08:56:36
UTC ---
the following also fails (for both c and c++):
extern __thread int i;
__thread int i;
===
- producing an empty asm file
===
gcc-4.6 produces:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50979
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04
09:28:28 UTC ---
That seems to have done the trick enough to complete the build of gcc.
Great.
Please commit it.
Let me test it a bit on Linux first.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50990
Bug #: 50990
Summary: vector.tcc:373:5: internal compiler error:
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25702|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25703|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49993
Arnaud Desitter arnaud02 at users dot sourceforge.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50990
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50990
--- Comment #2 from Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malaterre at gmail dot com
2011-11-04 10:50:30 UTC ---
Once I get the -save-temps output, I'll post them ASAP here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2011/11/msg8.html
I do not have direct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598
--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04 10:50:36
UTC ---
in tree-emults:
(gdb) call debug_tree(var-decl)
var_decl 0x41da24e0 i
type integer_type 0x41d17360 int public SI
size integer_cst 0x41d0455c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50763
--- Comment #21 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04 10:56:44 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Fri Nov 4 10:56:39 2011
New Revision: 180936
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180936
Log:
2011-11-04 Tom de Vries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49993
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50763
--- Comment #22 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04 11:44:57 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Fri Nov 4 11:44:50 2011
New Revision: 180940
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180940
Log:
2011-11-04 Tom de Vries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50991
Bug #: 50991
Summary: crtstuff.c:65:23: fatal error: libgcc_tm.h: No such
file or directory
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
2004 (experimental) [trunk revision 180924] (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50991
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50730
--- Comment #6 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-04 12:55:11 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Fri Nov 4 12:55:06 2011
New Revision: 180945
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180945
Log:
Unrevert:
2011-10-24 Ira
1 - 100 of 306 matches
Mail list logo
