On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 8:21 PM, James Courtier-Dutton
james.dut...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 22, 2012 5:21 AM, Matt Davis mattdav...@gmail.com wrote:
Essentially, I just want to emit: and %eax, $0x7
Assuming att format, does that instruction actually exist?
How can you store the result in
Alan Lehotsky schrieb:
I'm working on a port to a Harvard architecture where the data memory
addresses are only 14 bits wide (e.g. 16kb) and the instruction
address space is 21 bits wide.
I do not want to define Pmode as PSImode; the machine has separate
address registers for data memory AND
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012, Joern Rennecke wrote:
I find that I'll have to change the epiphany LINK_SPEC to allow sane
interaction
between libc and libgloss. The latter might need errno / __errno from the
former.
May I apply a patch to config/epiphany/epiphany.h to fix this during phase 4?
For an
Hi all,
I need to profile a C++ program with 'gprof' but I'm only interested in
virtual functions. Is it possible to get indication of virtual function in
flat profile? As of now, virtual functions aren't marked in any special
way inside demangled names.
PS. A more general question, in case
Hi,
may I propose to change this message to a more user-friendly one?
In most cases, the message is triggered by a typo like here:
Int foo (void)
{
return 1;
}
A message like
error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'foo'
is just pain to the eyes, and apart from
On Jan 29, 2012, at 1:30 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Hi,
may I propose to change this message to a more user-friendly one?
In most cases, the message is triggered by a typo like here:
Int foo (void)
{
return 1;
}
A message like
error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or
Good Day,
I pray my mail gets to you this time. I'd write you on two occasions concerning
your assistance to help certify a piece of document due to some similarities in
location with the supposed care-taker to enable a safe transfer of securities
proceeds out of Turkey. Please let me know
Chris Lattner clatt...@apple.com writes:
Int foo (void) { return 1; }
A message like
error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'foo'
is just pain to the eyes, and apart from that it is not more helpful
than a simple syntax error before 'foo':
FWIW, Clang produces:
Greetings,
I have been trying to help diagnose a failure to build in the icu
package for Fedora on ARM systems, with gcc 4.7. I should very much like
to know the answer to a few questions, so that I can help fix this. I
would like to say at the outset that I believe I am a reasonably
competent
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52037
Bug #: 52037
Summary: [4.7 regression] ICE in update_ssa, at
tree-into-ssa.c:3362 while linking LTO libxul
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749
--- Comment #15 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-01-29
10:38:59 UTC ---
This one is evidently due to the reference-counted nature of our string class,
and is also very, very old. It will go away automagically when we'll
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500
gee jojelino at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26338|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52038
Bug #: 52038
Summary: [4.7 regression] fortran bootstrap failure: no
previous prototype for 'symbol_as'
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52037
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-01-29 11:14:19 UTC ---
-flto-partition=none is fine and every optimization level !=-O3, too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52037
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-01-29 11:32:59 UTC ---
I've uploaded the slim-lto files here:
http://trippelsdorf.de/testcase.tar.bz2
To reproduce just run:
% g++ @testcase -flto=4 -O3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52038
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52038
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
11:56:23 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Jan 29 11:56:18 2012
New Revision: 183675
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183675
Log:
2012-01-29 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52038
Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52038
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
11:59:59 UTC ---
FIXED on the trunk (4.7). Thanks for the report!
(In reply to comment #1)
Added (accidentally) with Rev. 183620 of 2012-01-27
(That's for PR 52016.)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52038
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981
--- Comment #32 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-01-29 12:09:57 UTC ---
Using 'symbol_as' without prototypes, as in comment #28, breaks bootstrap when
configured with '--disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx' (see pr52038).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981
--- Comment #33 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
12:17:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #32)
Using 'symbol_as' without prototypes, as in comment #28, breaks bootstrap when
configured with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51930
Philipp s...@s-e-f-i.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981
--- Comment #34 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-01-29 12:20:56 UTC ---
As written in comment 27, if it is only used in resolve.c, not a prototype but
static should be used.
AFAICT it could also be used in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52037
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-01-29 13:17:12 UTC ---
-O2 -finline-functions -fipa-cp-clone -flto=4
or
-O1 -findirect-inlining -fipa-cp -finline-small-functions -finline-functions
-fipa-cp-clone -flto=4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52037
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-01-29 13:56:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 26500
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26500
lto testcase
% /usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.0/lto1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52036
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46321
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
14:06:41 UTC ---
Remember also to update the component handling, cf. PR 51972 comment 3.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52036
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52039
Bug #: 52039
Summary: gcc/gimplify.o differs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52040
Bug #: 52040
Summary: TR1 is not accessible using compiler flags alone
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
-apple-darwin10.8.0
Configured with: ../work/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc/gcc4.7w
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,java,ada,lto --with-gmp=/opt/mp
--with-system-zlib --with-cloog=/opt/mp --enable-cloog-backend=isl --enable-lto
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20120129 (experimental
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-01-29
14:36:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 26501
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26501
Assembler for gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c at stage 2
Assembler generated
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-01-29
14:42:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 26502
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26502
bzipped assembler for gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c at stage 3
Assembler
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-01-29
14:44:55 UTC ---
Created attachment 26503
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26503
bzipped preprocessed file for gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c at stage 3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51754
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
14:51:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 26504
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26504
This fixes the ice-on-valid of comment #0
This patch (extracted from PR50981
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51754
--- Comment #9 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
14:53:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 26505
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26505
This fixes the class_41 failure with the previous patch
This fixes the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49857
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906
--- Comment #18 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-01-29
15:30:12 UTC ---
Here is a single stepping through 30_threads/try_lock/3.cc at -m64...
(gdb) break main
Breakpoint 1 at 0x10cd0: file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906
--- Comment #19 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29 15:37:45
UTC ---
could you also let me know what the value of
HAVE_AS_TLS
is in gcc/auto-host.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906
--- Comment #20 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-01-29
15:54:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
could you also let me know what the value of
HAVE_AS_TLS
is in gcc/auto-host.h
Both the darwin10 build (without this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dirtyepic at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52036
--- Comment #3 from Benjamin Kay benjamin at benkay dot net 2012-01-29
16:24:29 UTC ---
Oops! You're quite right, pi is automatic in my test case. However compilation
still fails if pi is given internal linkage by declaring it static, i.e.
int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52042
Bug #: 52042
Summary: libitm.c/clone-1.c and libitm.c/stackundo.c execution
tests are not pie compatible
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51808
--- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29 17:19:38
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Sun Jan 29 17:19:32 2012
New Revision: 183677
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183677
Log:
PR 51808 Support arbitrarily
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49857
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51808
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51967
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-01-29 17:27:24 UTC ---
On 23-Jan-12, at 10:39 AM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
do the printers ever work, outside the testsuite?
No.
Need to study the gdb build for this target. It looks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52036
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2012-01-29 17:28:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
However compilation still fails if pi is given internal linkage by declaring
it static, i.e.
int main()
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51947
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51808
--- Comment #4 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29 17:41:54
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Sun Jan 29 17:41:49 2012
New Revision: 183678
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183678
Log:
PR 51808 Fix ChangeLog entry
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52043
Bug #: 52043
Summary: [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: SIGSEGV in tsubst_copy
(pt.c:12081) with -Wreturn-type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49857
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|steven at gcc dot gnu.org |
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52044
Bug #: 52044
Summary: [OOP] Invalid memory access with ALLOCATE, default
initializer and polymorphic array components
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52037
Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52040
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51812
--- Comment #9 from bredelin at ucla dot edu 2012-01-29 18:30:43 UTC ---
Thanks :-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52036
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52045
Bug #: 52045
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: in execute_todo, at
passes.c:1748 with -O3 -ftracer -fno-tree-ccp
-fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-dce and stpcpy_chk()
Classification:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51754
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
18:49:10 UTC ---
When fixed, correctness check should be added to test3() of the test case
submitted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-01/msg00252.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52044
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52046
Bug #: 52046
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: invalid
operands in ternary operation with -O -fexceptions
-fnon-call-exceptions -ftree-vectorize
Classification:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51808
--- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29 19:01:14
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Sun Jan 29 19:01:09 2012
New Revision: 183679
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183679
Log:
PR 51808 Constify binding_label.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52047
Bug #: 52047
Summary: [trans-mem] ICE: SIGSEGV in execute_tm_mark
(trans-mem.c:2270) with -O -fgnu-tm
-fprefetch-loop-arrays
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52037
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-01-29 19:41:40 UTC ---
Actually, I've used a slightly different testcase (a random shuffle of the
contents of the @testcase input file) for the bisection and unfortunately
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51972
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
20:02:25 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Jan 29 20:02:19 2012
New Revision: 183680
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183680
Log:
2012-01-29 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51972
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41600
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
20:51:22 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Jan 29 20:51:19 2012
New Revision: 183682
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183682
Log:
2012-01-29 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41600
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
20:54:38 UTC ---
Status: Comment 1 is fixed by the just committed patch of comment 8.
TODO: The test case of comment 0: Once as is, once with CLASS IS instead of
TYPE IS -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51920
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52048
Bug #: 52048
Summary: [4.7 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -O2
-fcompare-debug -fnon-call-exceptions
-fno-tree-dominator-opts
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51327
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-29 21:41:58 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Jan 29 21:41:54 2012
New Revision: 183684
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183684
Log:
/cp
2012-01-29
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51327
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-29 21:43:00 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Jan 29 21:42:56 2012
New Revision: 183685
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183685
Log:
/cp
2012-01-29
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51327
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--with-system-zlib
Thread model: single
gcc version 4.7.0 20120129 (experimental) (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52040
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
22:22:07 UTC ---
We discussed this years ago, GCC's interpretation is valid, WONTFIX.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52036
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
22:25:02 UTC ---
At least we should change has not external linkage to proper English, that's
annoyed me for some time ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906
--- Comment #21 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
22:36:34 UTC ---
That gdb session in comment 18 makes no sense, owns_lock can't call trylock.
Your sources don't match your lib.
I thought this was a problem with WARNING:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7625
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8026
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2012-01-29
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52050
Bug #: 52050
Summary: -Wdeclaration-after-statement does not warn on
declaration in for loop initialiser
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8026
--- Comment #10 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
22:50:28 UTC ---
The GCC 4.1.1 install comes from a depot that contains GNU_C_C++_64.
Unfortunately I can't see if this is a stock FSF build or something changed by
the HP
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16150
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19799
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
23:09:08 UTC ---
Does not FAIL in Results for 4.6.3 20120129 (prerelease) [gcc-4_6-branch
revision
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38384
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44581
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46057
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52046
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51920
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19799
--- Comment #8 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-01-29 23:23:56 UTC ---
On 29-Jan-12, at 6:05 PM, steven at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19799
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52050
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52050
--- Comment #2 from Mans Rullgard mans at mansr dot com 2012-01-29 23:34:12
UTC ---
I tested and found it failing with 3.4.6, 4.1.2, 4.2.4, 4.3.6, 4.4.6, 4.5.3,
and 4.6.2.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46057
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-01-29 23:43:48 UTC ---
On 29-Jan-12, at 6:16 PM, steven at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
So, fixed? Or suspended?
Not fixed. The stack alignment would need adjustment in main.
The HP-UX runtime
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52048
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52048
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51875
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-29
23:56:44 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sun Jan 29 23:56:38 2012
New Revision: 183688
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183688
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52045
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51910
--- Comment #17 from Sandra Loosemore sandra at codesourcery dot com
2012-01-30 00:12:53 UTC ---
Cleaned up version of patch, with Jason's test case.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-01/msg01591.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52049
--- Comment #1 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30
00:15:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
I'm not sure whether this is actually a problem of the SH back-end or of some
middle-end passes. It happens for all sub-targets
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
