Hello,
Bootstrap is currently broken on x86 targets with binutils 2.20 (from
2009) and older (PR54419) because the rdrand instruction is emitted
but that instruction is only supported in binutils 2.21 and later.
This means bootstrap is broken on almost all x86_64 machines in the
compile farm for
Hello Everyone,
I am getting the following error when I am trying to build the trunk on
x86_64 SuSE Linux. My SVN head is at revision 190930. Is anyone else finding
this?
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Iyer, Balaji V balaji.v.i...@intel.com wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I am getting the following error when I am trying to build the trunk
on x86_64 SuSE Linux. My SVN head is at revision 190930. Is anyone else
finding this?
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Steven Bosscher wrote:
Also, on at least powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu (a primary platform) and
sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu and probably others (PR54453). The breakage
is caused by drepper's patches at r190783 and r190787. The breakage
on powerpc64 is now almost a week old.
-Original Message-
From: Georg-Johann Lay
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 1:05 PM
To: Selvaraj, Senthil_Kumar
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [AVR] Target specific regression test causes virtual memory
exhaustion
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj schrieb:
On a 64 bit machine,
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Iyer, Balaji V balaji.v.i...@intel.com wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I am getting the following error when I am trying to build the trunk
on x86_64 SuSE Linux. My SVN head is at revision 190930. Is anyone else
finding this?
It's happening with a g++ 4.3
Yes, I downloaded a GCC 4.6.3 and it seem to go well thus far.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
-Original Message-
From: Diego Novillo [mailto:dnovi...@google.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 12:03 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Trunk Build errors
On Tue, Sep 4,
Segher and I are planning to remove the machinery supporting
RS6000_CALL_GLUE. In the AIX ABI, used by AIX, PowerOpen, PPC64 Linux
and mcall-aixdesc, direct calls to named functions that may be
external are followed by a special no-op instruction that the linker
can replace with an instruction to
On 8/31/12, Laurynas Biveinis laurynas.bivei...@gmail.com wrote:
GRAMMAR
Support adding a second discriminator. This support is not for
multiple inheritance, but for single inheritance when a second
discriminator is used to further refine it. Look at struct
tree_omp_clause. It contains a
On 9/3/12, Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 24, 2012, Lawrence Crowl cr...@googlers.com wrote:
To take full advantage of the conversion to C++, we will need to use
I'm not sure what full advantage of single-inheritance vs. composition
is.
You get automatic
Hello All,
Do you maybe know how to find out (in legitimize_pic_address() and in
arm_assemble_integer()) whether an address (rtx) is in text/rodata or in data?
Maybe something like MEM_READONLY_P()? (But I don't know how to apply this to
an rtx ...)
That is for read-only position
On 08/30/12 15:39, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
Hello Everyone,
The Cilk-Plus branch is feature-complete. Programs using Cilk Plus
constructs get great performance on vector and multicore hardware. Programs
that don't use the new language features (enabled by a -fcilkplus flag) see no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54476
Bug #: 54476
Summary: Passing -1 to __builtin_avr_delay_cycles causes cc1
memory usage to explode on x86_64 host
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #52 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
08:03:08 UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Tue Sep 4 08:03:01 2012
New Revision: 190909
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190909
Log:
PR target/51244
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54443
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04 08:03:16 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Sep 4 08:03:09 2012
New Revision: 190910
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190910
Log:
2012-09-04 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54244
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04 08:03:18 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Sep 4 08:03:09 2012
New Revision: 190910
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190910
Log:
2012-09-04 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54220
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
09:08:54 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Sep 4 09:08:50 2012
New Revision: 190914
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190914
Log:
PR target/54220
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54220
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
09:14:40 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Sep 4 09:14:36 2012
New Revision: 190916
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190916
Log:
Backport from 2012-09-04
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54220
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
09:21:24 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Sep 4 09:21:20 2012
New Revision: 190917
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190917
Log:
Backport from 2012-09-04
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54220
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|AVR |avr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54458
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
09:29:02 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 4 09:28:58 2012
New Revision: 190918
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190918
Log:
2012-09-04 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54476
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
09:37:11 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Sep 4 09:37:08 2012
New Revision: 190920
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190920
Log:
PR target/54476
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45070
--- Comment #20 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04 09:36:48 UTC ---
Author: amker
Date: Tue Sep 4 09:36:44 2012
New Revision: 190919
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190919
Log:
PR target/45070
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54476
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
09:38:48 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Sep 4 09:38:42 2012
New Revision: 190921
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190921
Log:
Backport from 2012-09-04
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54476
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|AVR |avr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #21 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-09-04 10:27:58 UTC ---
How about this patch? Not sure whether this handles cross-compiling. It
seems
to work for me.
Before I test the patch, I am surprised to see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54458
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54469
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54474
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54469
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa*-*-* (32-bit) |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54474
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-09-04
10:44:28 UTC ---
Apparently Tobias is not around today. I have posted a potential fix at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-09/msg8.html
tested on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146
--- Comment #60 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
10:50:47 UTC ---
Another improvement that can be done for the test case, is to assign
pseudo-register numbers such that the density of the DF_LR and DF_LIVE bitmaps
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54083
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54477
Bug #: 54477
Summary: Inlining summary generation should not change the
current function
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46590
--- Comment #35 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
13:17:53 UTC ---
With -O1 FRE uses loads of memory and compile-time. Not the value-numbering
itself but compute_avail ()! Bah. Of course AVAIL sets get bigger and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54478
Bug #: 54478
Summary: Fails to bootstrap with GCC 4.3.6
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54478
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
13:57:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 28129
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28129
preprocessed source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54478
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54470
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54479
Bug #: 54479
Summary: Bootstrap with release-checking broken
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #22 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-09-04
14:17:52 UTC ---
It seems that when clang is used as the system compiler we will have to use a
run-time test as well to determine drand support. On a 2009 Mac Pro,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54472
--- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-09-04 14:48:02
UTC ---
For some reason, -fselective-scheduling is moving
(insn 19 16 22 2 (use (reg/i:SI 0 ax)) testcase.c:6 -1
(nil))
around. This insn marks function return,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54437
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54479
Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54479
--- Comment #2 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
15:17:00 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Tue Sep 4 15:16:51 2012
New Revision: 190937
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190937
Log:
PR bootstrap/54479
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54479
Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54453
--- Comment #9 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
15:28:46 UTC ---
Author: steven
Date: Tue Sep 4 15:28:39 2012
New Revision: 190939
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190939
Log:
PR bootstrap/54453
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54468
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54480
Bug #: 54480
Summary: Error: bad immediate value for offset
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
15:53:20 UTC ---
Why do you talk about clang? This has nothing to do with it. And, there is
already runtime check for whether RDRAND can be used in random.cc (though,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #24 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-09-04 15:56:17 UTC ---
As such, the patch in commen #20 does not work:
(1) on x86_64-apple-darwin10 it gives
[macbook] gcc/p_build% grep -r rdr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54478
Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53964
--- Comment #5 from Anton Shterenlikht mexas at bristol dot ac.uk 2012-09-04
16:09:23 UTC ---
Still the same with gcc-4.6-20120831:
gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc46/work/build/libcpp'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #25 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-09-04 16:14:01 UTC ---
I am now at stage 2 with
--- ../_clean/libstdc++-v3/configure2012-08-29 10:19:44.0 +0200
+++ ../p_work/libstdc++-v3/configure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54481
Bug #: 54481
Summary: missed optimization: unnecessary indirect call
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #26 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-09-04
16:37:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
Why do you talk about clang? This has nothing to do with it. And, there is
already runtime check for whether RDRAND can be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #27 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-09-04
16:47:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #25)
Your proposed patch from comment 25 appears to be working under clang 4.0 of
Xcode 4.4. The configure test is properly run
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54482
Bug #: 54482
Summary: catch-22 in static linking with libstdc++ fails
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54474
--- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
16:52:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Apparently Tobias is not around today. I have posted a potential fix at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-09/msg8.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54172
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot
...
../gcc-4.8-20120904/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.8
--mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc4.8/info
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto,objc,obj-c++,java --with-gmp=/sw
--with-libiconv-prefix=/sw --with-isl=/sw --with-cloog=/sw --with-mpc=/sw
--with-system-zlib --enable-checking=yes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54472
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
17:47:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
For some reason, -fselective-scheduling is moving
(insn 19 16 22 2 (use (reg/i:SI 0 ax)) testcase.c:6 -1
(nil))
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54172
--- Comment #9 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org 2012-09-04 17:47:08
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
(In reply to comment #7)
I posted the patches on Thursday, three patches because I found one more
issue,
to both lists.
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #29 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
18:24:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
The Apple clang 4.0 compiler defaults to its integrated
assembler
such that the simple test case...
int
main ()
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54483
Bug #: 54483
Summary: undefined reference to static constexpr in .so
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54478
--- Comment #4 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
18:33:34 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Tue Sep 4 18:33:29 2012
New Revision: 190943
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190943
Log:
This patch works
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54478
Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54478
Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54437
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
18:50:03 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Sep 4 18:49:51 2012
New Revision: 190946
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190946
Log:
PR c++/54437
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51213
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
18:50:03 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Sep 4 18:49:51 2012
New Revision: 190946
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190946
Log:
PR c++/54437
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54468
Michael H. Cox mhcox at bluezoosoftware dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54437
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54456
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
19:05:43 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Sep 4 19:05:38 2012
New Revision: 190947
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190947
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54456
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54198
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
19:35:08 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Sep 4 19:35:02 2012
New Revision: 190949
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190949
Log:
PR c++/54198
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54198
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54480
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54414
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54398
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54295
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45070
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54168
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54303
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|ARM |arm*,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54067
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
-DGENERATOR_FILE -I. -Ibuild -I../../gcc-4.8-20120904/gcc
-I../../gcc-4.8-20120904/gcc/build -I../../gcc-4.8-20120904/gcc/../include
-I../../gcc-4.8-20120904/gcc/../libcpp/include -I/sw/include -I/sw/include
-I../../gcc-4.8-20120904/gcc/../libdecnumber
-I../../gcc-4.8-20120904/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54484
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-09-04
20:21:23 UTC ---
Bootstrap failure remains at r190949.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54303
Tom Rini tom.rini at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm*, x86_64-linux-gnu |arm*-linux-gnu
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54303
Tom Rini tom.rini at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54469
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54484
--- Comment #2 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04
21:07:56 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Tue Sep 4 21:07:48 2012
New Revision: 190951
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190951
Log:
Fix bootstrap failure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54484
Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54485
Bug #: 54485
Summary: g++ should diagnose default arguments in out-of-line
definitions for template class member functions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54374
--- Comment #3 from Glenn Burkhardt gbburkhardt at gmail dot com 2012-09-04
21:40:55 UTC ---
I'd be more convinced about 'works for me' if I could see the full version
number of the compiler. I've just double checked that the files I uploaded
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54128
--- Comment #12 from Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04 21:46:55
UTC ---
Proposed patch has been posted to gcc-patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg02089.html
Use NONDEBUG_INSN_P instead of INSN_P in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54469
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-09-04
21:54:56 UTC ---
For the record, this was started with the patch submitted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-04/msg01456.html. From the Ada failures
reported at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54420
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54398
asharif at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28096|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54398
--- Comment #3 from asharif at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04 22:48:51 UTC ---
Sorry about that.
Attached is a preprocessed file that reproduces the bug.
gcc version: gcc-4.6.4 at 19788:190734 (as reported by svnversion -c)
system type: arm linux
1 - 100 of 212 matches
Mail list logo
