Re: Proposing switch -fsmart-pointers

2012-10-09 Thread Peter
On Oct 8, 2012, at 5:17 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote: On 10/06/2012 11:59 AM, _ wrote: Not that I think that STL/Boost are not great solutions for many problems out there. But the fact is that there is and always will be c/c++ code that can't and will not use it. But surely the

Re: Proposing switch -fsmart-pointers

2012-10-09 Thread Ladislav Nevery
Ahh ... sorry for that incomplete mail. I lost my right hand in paragliding accident 2 months ago. And writing mail with one hand on tablet is kinda weird. Again sorry .;( Here is the complete version. On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote: On 10/06/2012 11:59 AM, _

Re: DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION(cgraphnode-decl) == NULL when attempting Link-Time Optimization in plugin

2012-10-09 Thread Richard Guenther
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:29 PM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 18:21 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:17 PM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote: I'm working on a static analysis extension to GCC via my gcc-python-plugin [1] The

Cannot modify jumps after sched2

2012-10-09 Thread Paulo Matos
Hi, Is there any good way to define TARGET_CANNOT_MODIFY_JUMPS_P such that jumps are not modified after sched2? Or in other words, is there a way to recognize if sched2 has already been ran (sched2_completed, maybe)? Cheers, Paulo Matos

Re: Cannot modify jumps after sched2

2012-10-09 Thread Joern Rennecke
Quoting Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com: Paul Matos wrote (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-10/msg00123.html): Is there any good way to define TARGET_CANNOT_MODIFY_JUMPS_P such that jumps are not modified after sched2? No, there isn't. Well, you could add a target-specific pass after

Re: [RFC] Unsolicited usage of VFP registers for Cortex-M4F

2012-10-09 Thread Ilija Kocho
Hi Joey Thank you for explanations. Now I have some comments and additional questions. Since now it will be a discussion rather than looking for help, I am re-routing the discussion to GCC mailing list. For those looking for the complete history, here is the context:

Re: Proposing switch -fsmart-pointers

2012-10-09 Thread Andrew Haley
On 10/09/2012 12:31 AM, Peter wrote: On Oct 8, 2012, at 5:17 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote: On 10/06/2012 11:59 AM, _ wrote: Not that I think that STL/Boost are not great solutions for many problems out there. But the fact is that there is and always will be c/c++ code that can't

unsigned integers and the calculation of PI

2012-10-09 Thread Mischa Baars
Hi All, I'm trying to verify the 'fldpi' instruction on the Intel Processor. Hope you would like to have a look at the following piece of example code? Best Regards, Mischa.

Re: Cannot modify jumps after sched2

2012-10-09 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
Paulo Matos schrieb: Hi, Is there any good way to define TARGET_CANNOT_MODIFY_JUMPS_P such that jumps are not modified after sched2? Or in other words, is there a way to recognize if sched2 has already been ran (sched2_completed, maybe)? Such flags would be really helpful, but unfortunately

RE: [RFC] Unsolicited usage of VFP registers for Cortex-M4F

2012-10-09 Thread Joey Ye
-Original Message- From: Ilija Kocho [mailto:ili...@siva.com.mk] Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 21:08 To: Joey Ye Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Terry Guo Subject: Re: [RFC] Unsolicited usage of VFP registers for Cortex-M4F Hi Joey Thank you for explanations. Now I have some comments

[Bug c++/54427] Expose more vector extensions

2012-10-09 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54427 --- Comment #9 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-09 06:18:35 UTC --- Author: glisse Date: Tue Oct 9 06:18:29 2012 New Revision: 192238 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192238 Log: 2012-10-09 Marc

[Bug middle-end/54860] [4.8 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf configuring libgfortran due to recent attribute changes in core gcc

2012-10-09 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54860 --- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-10-09 06:37:12 UTC --- I can confirm the failure on alpha: (gdb) bt #0 0x000120b4c288 in htab_find_with_hash () #1 0x000120b4fac0 in

[Bug bootstrap/54820] [4.8 Regression] ada: cannot find -lstdc++ since 4.8.0 20121002

2012-10-09 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54820 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at

[Bug bootstrap/54863] New: [4.8 regresssion] multiple 'comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions' errors in simplify-rtx.c:simplify_truncation broke m68k-linux bootstrap

2012-10-09 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54863 Bug #: 54863 Summary: [4.8 regresssion] multiple 'comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions' errors in simplify-rtx.c:simplify_truncation broke m68k-linux

[Bug c++/54864] New: Decltype in nested class

2012-10-09 Thread zeratul976 at hotmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54864 Bug #: 54864 Summary: Decltype in nested class Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/54862] [4.8 Regression] error: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions in simplify-rtx.c

2012-10-09 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54862 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at

[Bug bootstrap/54863] [4.8 regresssion] multiple 'comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions' errors in simplify-rtx.c:simplify_truncation broke m68k-linux bootstrap

2012-10-09 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54863 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/54862] [4.8 Regression] error: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions in simplify-rtx.c

2012-10-09 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54862 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-10-09 07:41:22 UTC --- I got the exact same failure with gcc-4.8-20121007 on m68k-linux.

[Bug middle-end/54860] [4.8 Regression]: build fails when configuring libgfortran due to recent attribute changes in core gcc

2012-10-09 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54860 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.8 Regression]: build |[4.8

[Bug libstdc++/54754] [parallel mode] 'make check-parallel' only works on x86-64

2012-10-09 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54754 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-09 08:16:36 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Tue Oct 9 08:16:13 2012 New Revision: 192240 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192240 Log: PR

[Bug libstdc++/54754] [parallel mode] 'make check-parallel' only works on x86-64

2012-10-09 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54754 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/54257] gcc.target/i386/pr53249.c failure at -m64 on x86_64-apple-darwin

2012-10-09 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54257 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot

[Bug testsuite/53365] gcc.target/i386/pr53249.c FAILs for -m64 on Solaris 10

2012-10-09 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53365 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/54257] gcc.target/i386/pr53249.c failure at -m64 on x86_64-apple-darwin

2012-10-09 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54257 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gseanmcg at

Re: [Bug bootstrap/54820] [4.8 Regression] ada: cannot find -lstdc++ since 4.8.0 20121002

2012-10-09 Thread Arnaud Charlet
On that machine, the entire user-space is built without any static libstdc++ libraries, so it's quite annoying (and unexpected) to have to install them for Ada bootstrap. Couldn't Ada use the g++/libstdc++ bits from the compiler being built? That would probably be better indeed, it's

[Bug bootstrap/54820] [4.8 Regression] ada: cannot find -lstdc++ since 4.8.0 20121002

2012-10-09 Thread charlet at adacore dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54820 --- Comment #4 from charlet at adacore dot com charlet at adacore dot com 2012-10-09 08:34:03 UTC --- On that machine, the entire user-space is built without any static libstdc++ libraries, so it's quite annoying (and unexpected) to

[Bug target/54661] mcore_output_movedouble: operation on ‘memexp’ may be undefined

2012-10-09 Thread nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54661 --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton nickc at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-09 08:37:10 UTC --- Author: nickc Date: Tue Oct 9 08:37:00 2012 New Revision: 192241 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192241 Log: PR

[Bug target/54661] mcore_output_movedouble: operation on ‘memexp’ may be undefined

2012-10-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54661 --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com 2012-10-09 08:39:03 UTC --- This was due to a silly typo, now fixed.

[Bug libstdc++/54865] New: [parallel mode] tests timeout on power64

2012-10-09 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54865 Bug #: 54865 Summary: [parallel mode] tests timeout on power64 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/54866] New: gcc.target/i386/long-double-80-7.c FAILs

2012-10-09 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54866 Bug #: 54866 Summary: gcc.target/i386/long-double-80-7.c FAILs Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/54866] gcc.target/i386/long-double-80-7.c FAILs

2012-10-09 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54866 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug debug/54826] gdb test case failure (bs15503) due to gaps in lexical block

2012-10-09 Thread arnez at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54826 Andreas Arnez arnez at linux dot vnet.ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/54867] New: gcc.dg/pr44194-1.c FAILs

2012-10-09 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54867 Bug #: 54867 Summary: gcc.dg/pr44194-1.c FAILs Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/54868] New: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-22.c FAILs

2012-10-09 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54868 Bug #: 54868 Summary: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-22.c FAILs Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/54868] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-22.c FAILs

2012-10-09 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54868 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug fortran/53934] Better CPP macro diagnostics

2012-10-09 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53934 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc

[Bug libstdc++/54869] New: ext/random/simd_fast_mersenne_twister_engine/cons/default.cc FAILs

2012-10-09 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54869 Bug #: 54869 Summary: ext/random/simd_fast_mersenne_twister_engine/cons/defa ult.cc FAILs Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug rtl-optimization/54739] [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c scan-rtl-dump subreg1 Splitting reg

2012-10-09 Thread nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54739 --- Comment #11 from Nick Clifton nickc at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-09 09:22:00 UTC --- Author: nickc Date: Tue Oct 9 09:21:47 2012 New Revision: 192244 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192244 Log: PR

[Bug fortran/54870] New: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_4.f90 FAILs

2012-10-09 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54870 Bug #: 54870 Summary: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_4.f90 FAILs Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/54871] New: [4.8 regression] gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs

2012-10-09 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54871 Bug #: 54871 Summary: [4.8 regression] gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug lto/54856] Corrupted LTO type merging

2012-10-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54856 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/54871] [4.8 regression] gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs

2012-10-09 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54871 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug libstdc++/54872] New: [4.8 regression] abi_check FAILs on Solaris 10/11

2012-10-09 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54872 Bug #: 54872 Summary: [4.8 regression] abi_check FAILs on Solaris 10/11 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/54866] gcc.target/i386/long-double-80-7.c FAILs

2012-10-09 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54866 --- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-10-09 09:45:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) /var/gcc/regression/trunk/9-gcc/build/gcc/include/xmmintrin.h:32:3: error: #erro r SSE instruction set not enabled

[Bug libstdc++/54869] ext/random/simd_fast_mersenne_twister_engine/cons/default.cc FAILs

2012-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54869 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-10-09 09:49:08 UTC --- Guys, I don't have Sparc-Solaris machines and didn't design the testcase. To be honest, I didn't even realize so far that this simd_* variant was

[Bug libstdc++/54865] [parallel mode] tests timeout on power64

2012-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54865 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug go/54873] New: runtime/pprof FAILs

2012-10-09 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54873 Bug #: 54873 Summary: runtime/pprof FAILs Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/54868] [4.8 Regression]gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-22.c FAILs

2012-10-09 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54868 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-09 09:57:58 UTC --- I expected these 2 lines to disqualify a basic x86 target: /* { dg-require-effective-target vect_double } */ /* { dg-require-effective-target vect_perm

[Bug middle-end/54862] [4.8 Regression] error: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions in simplify-rtx.c

2012-10-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54862 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/54874] New: OOP: polymorphic allocation with SOURCE

2012-10-09 Thread sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54874 Bug #: 54874 Summary: OOP: polymorphic allocation with SOURCE Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/54784] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [OOP] wrong code in polymorphic allocation with SOURCE

2012-10-09 Thread sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54784 --- Comment #9 from Salvatore Filippone sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2012-10-09 09:59:28 UTC --- Just opened 54874. May or may not be a duplicate of this one.

[Bug c++/54194] misleading suggestion about arithmetic in operand of '|'

2012-10-09 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54194 --- Comment #9 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-09 10:01:37 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Oct 9 10:01:31 2012 New Revision: 192246 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192246 Log:

[Bug fortran/54874] OOP: polymorphic allocation with SOURCE

2012-10-09 Thread sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54874 --- Comment #1 from Salvatore Filippone sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2012-10-09 10:02:41 UTC --- Interestingly, taking out the outer container p% makes the code work... ---

[Bug c++/54194] misleading suggestion about arithmetic in operand of '|'

2012-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54194 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/54867] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/pr44194-1.c FAILs

2012-10-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54867 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug libstdc++/54869] ext/random/simd_fast_mersenne_twister_engine/cons/default.cc FAILs

2012-10-09 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54869 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Target|sparc*-*-solaris2*

[Bug libstdc++/54869] ext/random/simd_fast_mersenne_twister_engine/cons/default.cc FAILs

2012-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54869 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-10-09 10:20:45 UTC --- Can also be something even more trivial, because I bet we didn't exercise much the codepath for __SSE2__ undefined before committing the code.

[Bug fortran/54874] OOP: polymorphic allocation with SOURCE

2012-10-09 Thread sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54874 --- Comment #2 from Salvatore Filippone sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2012-10-09 10:37:13 UTC --- And it is also a regression, as it works on 4.6.3: --- [sfilippo@jacobi bug34]$ gfortran

[Bug target/54699] [4.8 Regression] [SH] gfortran.dg/class_array_9.f03 ICEs

2012-10-09 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54699 Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/54874] OOP: polymorphic allocation with SOURCE

2012-10-09 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54874 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-10-09 10:48:30 UTC --- And it is also a regression, as it works on 4.6.3: ... Well, this may be more complicated. On x86_64-apple-darwin10, compiling the attached

[Bug fortran/54874] OOP: polymorphic allocation with SOURCE

2012-10-09 Thread sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54874 --- Comment #4 from Salvatore Filippone sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2012-10-09 11:03:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) And it is also a regression, as it works on 4.6.3: ... Well, this may be more complicated. On

[Bug libstdc++/54869] ext/random/simd_fast_mersenne_twister_engine/cons/default.cc FAILs

2012-10-09 Thread drepper.fsp at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54869 --- Comment #4 from Ulrich Drepper drepper.fsp at gmail dot com 2012-10-09 11:23:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) The new ext/random/simd_fast_mersenne_twister_engine/cons/default.cc testcase FAILs on Solaris/SPARC (both 32 and

[Bug libstdc++/54869] ext/random/simd_fast_mersenne_twister_engine/cons/default.cc FAILs

2012-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54869 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-10-09 11:28:45 UTC --- Ok, thanks, I missed that remark of yours. Well, at present nothing prevents people with big endian machines to try to use the code, and we

[Bug libstdc++/54869] ext/random/simd_fast_mersenne_twister_engine/cons/default.cc FAILs

2012-10-09 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54869 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-10-09 11:35:19 UTC --- ... I don't have access to any big endian machines and therefore didn't even try to make it work. AFAICT there are big endian machines in

[Bug libstdc++/54869] ext/random/simd_fast_mersenne_twister_engine/cons/default.cc FAILs

2012-10-09 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54869 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-10-09 11:39:17 UTC --- As Nathan Froyd said at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-10/msg00772.html Please try to consider what's best for all the people who use

[Bug bootstrap/54820] [4.8 Regression] ada: cannot find -lstdc++ since 4.8.0 20121002

2012-10-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54820 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug libstdc++/54869] ext/random/simd_fast_mersenne_twister_engine/cons/default.cc FAILs

2012-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54869 --- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-10-09 11:44:09 UTC --- Boy, nobody cites me like that, at least, not while I'm still alive.

[Bug middle-end/54862] [4.8 Regression] error: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions in simplify-rtx.c

2012-10-09 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54862 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

Re: [Bug bootstrap/54820] [4.8 Regression] ada: cannot find -lstdc++ since 4.8.0 20121002

2012-10-09 Thread Arnaud Charlet
On that machine, the entire user-space is built without any static libstdc++ libraries, so it's quite annoying (and unexpected) to have to install them for Ada bootstrap. Couldn't Ada use the g++/libstdc++ bits from the compiler being built? No, this is stage 1 so the libstdc++

[Bug bootstrap/54820] [4.8 Regression] ada: cannot find -lstdc++ since 4.8.0 20121002

2012-10-09 Thread charlet at adacore dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54820 --- Comment #6 from charlet at adacore dot com charlet at adacore dot com 2012-10-09 13:09:38 UTC --- On that machine, the entire user-space is built without any static libstdc++ libraries, so it's quite annoying (and unexpected) to

[Bug rtl-optimization/54867] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/pr44194-1.c FAILs

2012-10-09 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54867 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-09 13:35:01 UTC --- Created attachment 28398 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28398 final dump Unfortunately, this doesn't help. I'm attaching the -m64

[Bug tree-optimization/54868] [4.8 Regression]gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-22.c FAILs

2012-10-09 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54868 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-09 13:37:56 UTC --- Maybe moving the test from tree-ssa/ to vect/ would be enough? Seems like vect.exp uses check_vect_support_and_set_flags (I don't see how to use that for

[Bug bootstrap/54820] [4.8 Regression] ada: cannot find -lstdc++ since 4.8.0 20121002

2012-10-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54820 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-09 13:37:57 UTC --- Well, we could first build g++ and libstdc++, and then Ada I guess, but that's probably too ambitious. Very likely indeed, since you need to

[Bug c++/54875] New: Forward declare enums cannot be used as a template argument

2012-10-09 Thread public at alisdairm dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54875 Bug #: 54875 Summary: Forward declare enums cannot be used as a template argument Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug target/54866] gcc.target/i386/long-double-80-7.c FAILs

2012-10-09 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54866 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-09 13:40:32 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Tue Oct 9 13:40:21 2012 New Revision: 192253 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192253 Log: Fix

[Bug target/54866] gcc.target/i386/long-double-80-7.c FAILs

2012-10-09 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54866 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug ada/54845] [trunk/gcc/c-family/c-ada-spec.c:3114]: (error) Buffer is accessed out of bounds.

2012-10-09 Thread charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54845 Arnaud Charlet charlet at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug bootstrap/54834] bootstrap fails when building libbacktrace

2012-10-09 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54834 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Schlüter tobi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-09 14:00:43 UTC --- Created attachment 28399 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28399 toplevel config.log I'm attaching the toplevel config.log. From it I read

[Bug bootstrap/54834] bootstrap fails when building libbacktrace

2012-10-09 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54834 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Schlüter tobi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-09 14:06:19 UTC --- I ran make in a directory with a pre-existing build, ao maybe that include file was an old leftover. Please don't invest any further time in this now, I'll

[Bug middle-end/54860] [4.8 Regression]: build fails when configuring libgfortran due to recent attribute changes in core gcc

2012-10-09 Thread dodji at seketeli dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54860 --- Comment #8 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org 2012-10-09 14:08:20 UTC --- I can reproduce it now. I guess I shouldn't look at bugs around midnight or something.

[Bug c++/54808] error: non-trivial conversion at assignment (with bit fields)

2012-10-09 Thread chgena at mail dot ru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54808 --- Comment #3 from chgena at mail dot ru 2012-10-09 14:10:09 UTC --- Some 4.8 betas seem to be affected too

[Bug bootstrap/54837] [4.8 Regression] lto bootstrap error: ICE in expand_debug_source_expr, at cfgexpand.c:3538

2012-10-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54837 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-09 14:14:36 UTC --- DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN (parm) == aexp (gdb) call debug_tree (parm) parm_decl 0x75f34000 unit_num type integer_type 0x760c85e8 int

[Bug c++/54875] Forward declare enums cannot be used as a template argument

2012-10-09 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54875 Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/54875] Forward declare enums cannot be used as a template argument

2012-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54875 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug bootstrap/54837] [4.8 Regression] lto bootstrap error: ICE in expand_debug_source_expr, at cfgexpand.c:3538

2012-10-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54837 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-09 14:40:12 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Oct 9 14:40:01 2012 New Revision: 192255 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192255 Log: 2012-10-09

[Bug fortran/54874] [OOP] polymorphic allocation with SOURCE

2012-10-09 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54874 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug fortran/54874] [OOP] polymorphic allocation with SOURCE

2012-10-09 Thread sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54874 --- Comment #6 from Salvatore Filippone sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2012-10-09 14:46:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) (In reply to comment #0) I am getting the following output from the test case. It seems wrong, I do not see

[Bug fortran/54874] [OOP] polymorphic allocation with SOURCE

2012-10-09 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54874 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-09 14:47:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Well, this may be more complicated. On x86_64-apple-darwin10, compiling the attached test with 4.6.3 gives: [...] a.out(97528) malloc:

[Bug libstdc++/54869] ext/random/simd_fast_mersenne_twister_engine/cons/default.cc FAILs

2012-10-09 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54869 --- Comment #9 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-09 14:50:31 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Oct 9 14:50:19 2012 New Revision: 192256 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192256 Log:

[Bug middle-end/54860] [4.8 Regression]: build fails when configuring libgfortran due to recent attribute changes in core gcc

2012-10-09 Thread dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54860 --- Comment #9 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-09 14:52:24 UTC --- Created attachment 28400 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28400 Candidate fix patch Guys, could you please test this patch on your

[Bug libstdc++/54869] ext/random/simd_fast_mersenne_twister_engine/cons/default.cc FAILs

2012-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54869 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/54869] ext/random/simd_fast_mersenne_twister_engine/cons/default.cc FAILs

2012-10-09 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54869 --- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-10-09 15:05:31 UTC --- --- Comment #4 from Ulrich Drepper drepper.fsp at gmail dot com 2012-10-09 11:23:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0)

[Bug bootstrap/54837] [4.8 Regression] lto bootstrap error: ICE in expand_debug_source_expr, at cfgexpand.c:3538

2012-10-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54837 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/29383] Fortran 2003/F95[TR15580:1999]: Floating point exception (IEEE) support

2012-10-09 Thread andy.nelson at lanl dot gov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29383 --- Comment #8 from Andy Nelson andy.nelson at lanl dot gov 2012-10-09 15:19:36 UTC --- Interesting. Didn't see this dup originally in my search. In response to your other email (that it is very very hard), can you explain a bit why if

[Bug bootstrap/54876] New: [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap broken, streaming garbage-collected BLOCK

2012-10-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54876 Bug #: 54876 Summary: [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap broken, streaming garbage-collected BLOCK Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug bootstrap/54876] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap broken, streaming garbage-collected BLOCK

2012-10-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54876 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/54876] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap broken, streaming garbage-collected BLOCK

2012-10-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54876 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-09 15:29:12 UTC --- Err, static tree prune_expression_for_jf_1 (tree *tp, int *walk_subtrees, void *) { if (EXPR_P (*tp)) SET_EXPR_LOCATION (*tp,

[Bug c++/51228] [4.6 Regression] ICE with transparent union

2012-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51228 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/53397] Scimark performance drops by 10x times when compiled -O3 -march=amdfam10 due to generation more prefecthes

2012-10-09 Thread venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53397 Venkataramanan venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug c++/53763] Missing error check on decltype when used within variadic template argument list

2012-10-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53763 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot

  1   2   3   >