This is the beta release of binutils 2.23.51.0.5 for Linux, which is
based on binutils 2012 1110 in CVS on sourceware.org plus various
changes. It is purely for Linux.
All relevant patches in patches have been applied to the source tree.
You can take a look at patches/README to see what have been
It appears that
static bitmap clear_alias_sets = NULL;
is never set, and as a consequence
clear_alias_set_lookup (alias_set_type alias_set)
is never called. This conclusion is reinforced because it
unconditionally uses htab_t clear_alias_mode_table, which is never
allocated.
--
Lawrence
On 11/12/12, Lawrence Crowl cr...@googlers.com wrote:
It appears that
static bitmap clear_alias_sets = NULL;
is never set, and as a consequence
clear_alias_set_lookup (alias_set_type alias_set)
is never called. This conclusion is reinforced because it
unconditionally uses htab_t
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Lawrence Crowl cr...@googlers.com wrote:
On 11/12/12, Lawrence Crowl cr...@googlers.com wrote:
It appears that
static bitmap clear_alias_sets = NULL;
is never set, and as a consequence
clear_alias_set_lookup (alias_set_type alias_set)
is never called.
Hi,
I don't understand why pretty-print is used inside asan.c. We now
are writing in C++ so can't you just use std::string? Or use obstack.
The use of the pretty-print mechanism seems like over kill here.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
Hi,
I think it would be best to split asan.c into two different files,
one for the tree level code and another for the rtl level code. This
is good for two reasons, one it forces the tree level code not to
include any rtl level specific ideas and it also improves
maintainability of the code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54413
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
09:12:35 UTC ---
Ed, N.B. if you use the ChangeLog entry as the svn commit log then the PR
number in the log means Bugzilla gets automatically updated with a link to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55280
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55272
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55280
--- Comment #3 from Guangmu Zhu guangmuzhu at gmail dot com 2012-11-12
09:22:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
As Andrew said, this is not a bug, see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Most_vexing_parse
You can force it to be parsed as
version 4.8.0 20121112 (experimental) [trunk revision 193427] (GCC)
same with
bzip2 -d PhiPattern.ii.bz2
pb-d-128-141-131-26:bugs48 innocent$ c++ -std=gnu++11 -O3 -c PhiPattern.ii
pb-d-128-141-131-26:bugs48 innocent$ c++ -std=gnu++11 -Ofast -c PhiPattern.ii
plugins/PhiPattern.cc: In member function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54127
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
).
gcc version 4.8.0 20121112 (experimental) (GCC)
module mod
use omp_lib
type :: my_t
integer :: i
end type my_t
contains
subroutine init( this )
class( my_t ) :: this
!type( my_t ) :: this
write(*,*) 'init thread=',omp_get_thread_num()
this%i=2
end subroutine init
end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55281
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41993
--- Comment #12 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
10:35:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Kaz, can you please test following patch, if it works ok SH4?
Works fine. I've confirmed that there are no new
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55272
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-11-12
10:40:30 UTC ---
The culprit seems to be Rev. 189881.
Untested patch:
...
AFAICT the patch does not fix this PR.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55283
Bug #: 55283
Summary: EON performance regression at -O2 due to loop
unrolling changes
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55283
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
10:44:14 UTC ---
http://gcc.opensuse.org/SPEC/CINT/sb-frescobaldi.suse.de-head-64/252_eon_big.png
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55284
Bug #: 55284
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE in read_cgraph_and_symbols, at
lto/lto.c:2944 (when -MMD is passed)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55272
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-11-12
10:52:30 UTC ---
Actually, the patch fixed the PR (I did not use the patched version
in the previous test).
Sorry for the noise.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55272
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
11:03:46 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Nov 12 11:03:42 2012
New Revision: 193429
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193429
Log:
2012-11-12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55272
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
11:09:50 UTC ---
FIXED on the 4.8 trunk (which was only affected).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55272
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55281
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
11:46:30 UTC ---
Actually, that shorter testcase ICEs for a different reason.
static inline float
bar (float k, float j)
{
float l = 0.0f;
if (k j)
l = k;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55253
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55285
Bug #: 55285
Summary: Botan regression on ia-64 at Mar-2012
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636
--- Comment #37 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
12:16:18 UTC ---
Fatigue now gets all inlining with -O3 -fwhole-program, with -O3 it gets only
half of inlining because jump functions are not able to track array
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55285
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636
Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55284
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55284
--- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-11-12 12:55:50 UTC ---
just
touch foo.cc
enough…
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55284
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55284
--- Comment #4 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-11-12 13:07:35 UTC ---
and most probably is already fixed at linker level as does not happen with
GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.23.51.20121020
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55286
Bug #: 55286
Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bytemark ASSIGNMENT 4% - 10%
slower
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54077
--- Comment #17 from wbrana wbrana at gmail dot com 2012-11-12 13:17:08 UTC
---
there is another bug caused by revision 175752
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55286
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54966
--- Comment #11 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-11-12 13:19:42 UTC ---
much better with
gcc version 4.8.0 20121112 (experimental) [trunk revision 193427] (GCC)
but for size 6. v1 with lto
[innocent
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55286
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-11-12
13:44:32 UTC ---
r175752 is a follow-up fix to r175589, so my guess is that it's the combination
of the two that's causing the regression.
Can you construct a small
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55230
Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkachov at arm dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55282
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55282
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12 14:47:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Note that Fortran 2003 is not supported in OpenMP 3.1. This may change with
OpenMP 4, but I'm not sure of that.
Just checked: The public
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55267
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52538
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52485
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55281
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
15:12:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 28668
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28668
gcc48-pr55281.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55287
Bug #: 55287
Summary: GCC crashes and asks to file bug report
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55287
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55281
--- Comment #4 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-11-12 15:37:23 UTC ---
regression removed by the patch
at first sight performances are similar to 4.7.2, so also vectorization is ok
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53475
--- Comment #13 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-11-12
15:38:12 UTC ---
Honza, I'm a bit confused here: if I understand correctly your r187631 was only
about a C++ optimization, but now I see C testcases too here?!?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55281
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12 16:18:52
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
[ Using ?: with a vector condition ]
I was surprised only C++ handles this and not C BTW.
Sorry, I didn't have time to do a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55281
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
16:23:29 UTC ---
I'm just testing that, so I know it doesn't have side-effects. COND_EXPR
handling which I've copied was doing the same thing. The reason for the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55281
--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12 16:39:27
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
I'm just testing that, so I know it doesn't have side-effects.
I meant: instead of testing, so the optimization still occurs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55287
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
17:01:57 UTC ---
Also this ICE is really the kernel killing the program as it ran out of
memory or it was over one of the ulimits. Most likely ran of memory.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55257
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55257
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
17:14:41 UTC ---
It is a requirement if you want proper debug info or unwind info for the thunk,
without that (or without calling the corresponding functions yourself,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55257
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
17:21:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
It can't be called from
the middle end, because some targets need to perform various things before
final_start_function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55275
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54413
--- Comment #16 from Ed Smith-Rowland 3dw4rd at verizon dot net 2012-11-12
17:48:29 UTC ---
Thanks, So If there are several ChangeLogs in the tree to get updated which one
do I put in the svn commit? Or does it matter?
Also, I just
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55287
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-11-12
17:50:20 UTC ---
Indeed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55275
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
18:04:53 UTC ---
Yep, I filed this before your reply on the list. I'm happy to change future
without using the tag, I was just being (maybe too) cautious about ABI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55288
Bug #: 55288
Summary: Improve handling/suppression of maybe-uninitialized
warnings
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27557
Carlos O'Donell carlos at systemhalted dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54413
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
18:30:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
Thanks, So If there are several ChangeLogs in the tree to get updated which
one
do I put in the svn commit? Or does it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55282
--- Comment #3 from Valery Weber valeryweber at hotmail dot com 2012-11-12
19:18:34 UTC ---
Thanks pointing that. Is there any reason for not allowing the classes in
openmp?
I noticed that other compilers (eg ifort, xlf) can accommodate
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
Bug #: 55289
Summary: darwin bootstrap fails due to missing
libsanitizer/interception/mach_override directory and
files
Classification: Unclassified
Product:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55282
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55288
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47599
Earnie earnie at users dot sourceforge.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41993
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51447
--- Comment #14 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
20:22:05 UTC ---
Author: steven
Date: Mon Nov 12 20:21:59 2012
New Revision: 193453
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193453
Log:
gcc/
PR
-auxbase z -O2 -version -o z.s
==5815==
GNU C (GCC) version 4.8.0 20121112 (experimental) (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.7.2 20120921 (Red Hat 4.7.2-2), GMP version
5.0.2, MPFR version 3.1.0, MPC version 0.9
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51447
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55291
Bug #: 55291
Summary: libsanitizer doesn't build multilib
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55290
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55292
Bug #: 55292
Summary: libsanitizer doesn't support x32
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50457
--- Comment #16 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
20:57:12 UTC ---
Another thing that might be useful for dealing with atomics on SH1* and SH2*
targets is to make the compiler generate the rewind sequences in interrupt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55288
--- Comment #2 from Ryan Johnson scovich at gmail dot com 2012-11-12 21:11:43
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Why don't just initialize the variable? It seems simpler than implementing yet
another special attribute in GCC.
In the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55238
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55293
Bug #: 55293
Summary: Attempt to bootstrap 7.7.2 on Solaris 10 Sparc fails
with gcc/pretty-print.c:954:28: error: invalid
conversion from 'char**' to 'const char**'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55293
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
21:48:46 UTC ---
Solaris defines a non-standard iconv() signature unless you request POSIX 2001
Try adding -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 to the compilation flags
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55293
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
21:50:08 UTC ---
Or -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55294
Bug #: 55294
Summary: Invalid RTL sharing in lower-subreg
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55294
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12 21:53:58
UTC ---
Created attachment 28670
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28670
split1 and subreg2 logs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55294
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
21:55:11 UTC ---
I think this is because:
(subreg:SF (reg/v:V2SF 167 [ a ]) 0)))
is invalid to begin with. Yes we don't reject it but I think we should.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55293
--- Comment #3 from Dennis Clarke dclarke at blastwave dot org 2012-11-12
22:07:29 UTC ---
OKay, I am extracting a fresh gcc 4.7.2 tarball and then running a new
bootstrap with the defines suggested. Results should appear in seven hours or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55293
--- Comment #4 from Dennis Clarke dclarke at blastwave dot org 2012-11-12
22:10:01 UTC ---
bootstrap fails in 71 seconds :
$ mkdir gcc-4.7.2_sparc64-sun-solaris2.10
$ cd gcc-4.7.2_sparc64-sun-solaris2.10
$ env | sort
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55295
Bug #: 55295
Summary: [SH] Add support for fipr instruction
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55295
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12 22:39:27
UTC ---
I forgot to mention that at least there should be a target specific built-in
function to generate the fipr insn. There is already a SHmedia built-in for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55293
--- Comment #5 from Dennis Clarke dclarke at blastwave dot org 2012-11-12
22:44:19 UTC ---
okay, exact same failure happens with -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L by itself.
Am trying with _XOPEN_SOURCE=600 defined. Thus far ( well past 70 secs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55296
Bug #: 55296
Summary: [SH] Add support for disinterrupt function attribute
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55293
--- Comment #6 from Dennis Clarke dclarke at blastwave dot org 2012-11-12
23:06:56 UTC ---
the following fails also .. and it fails early :
$
$ CC='gcc -m64 -g -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600' CXX='g++ -m64 -g -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600' \
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55297
Bug #: 55297
Summary: 4.8 Regression: type-bound operator clashes with
abstract interface
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55298
Bug #: 55298
Summary: [SH] Add support to disable FPU usage for individual
functions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55299
Bug #: 55299
Summary: missed optimization: ASR idiom
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55297
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55300
Bug #: 55300
Summary: [SH] Add support for store queue address space
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55293
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55301
Bug #: 55301
Summary: [SH] broken sp_switch function attribute
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
1 - 100 of 228 matches
Mail list logo
