James Lemke jwlemke at codesourcery.com writes:
I have completed the binutils submission for VLE.
I am working on the gcc submission. The test results are looking good
now. Patches will be posted very soon.
Do you have any update on the work on VLE-support?
Thanks for any feedback you can
On 03/21/2013 09:58 AM, Will wrote:
James Lemke jwlemke at codesourcery.com writes:
I have completed the binutils submission for VLE.
I am working on the gcc submission. The test results are looking good
now. Patches will be posted very soon.
Do you have any update on the work on
We have negotiated a reduced rate of $105/night (+ tax) at the
Avante Hotel in Mountain View.
860 E. EL CAMINO REAL, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94040
650-940-1000
https://www.jdvhotels.com/hotels/california/silicon-valley-hotels/hotel-avante
Here is the link for registration:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Will william.swashbuck...@gmail.com wrote:
James Lemke jwlemke at codesourcery.com writes:
I have completed the binutils submission for VLE.
I am working on the gcc submission. The test results are looking good
now. Patches will be posted very soon.
Do you
I have been told that the Project - Implement regular expressions in
c++ mentored by Sir Benjamin De Kosnik is not completed and is
available for this year GSoC project also by the the Mentor.
Sorry, there still appears to be some confusion here.
I am not mentoring GSOC this year. Here is
Snapshot gcc-4.8-20130321 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.8-20130321/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.8 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
Hello Sales,
Greetings from Gonapa Bond Ltd. Introduction, I am Jeffrey Goodman the founder
of the above named company here in Cook Islands. We are making inquiry if you
ship
internationally but specifically to our location here in Cook Islands.
In addition, we would like to know if you
EFICIENCIA ENERGÉTICA EN INSTALACIONES INDUSTRIALES
Solución Real para una Preocupación Mundial
11 y 12 de abril 2013 / Emporio Reforma / Ciudad de México
Conscientes de la URGENTE necesidad de adoptar prácticas de AHORRO de ENERGÍA
por cuestiones ECONÓMICAS y MEDIOAMBIENTALES.
I.T.S. le
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56671
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2013-03-21 08:31:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 29703
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29703
callgraph
Looks like a bug in constant expression
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56672
Bug #: 56672
Summary: Bad optimization
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56673
Bug #: 56673
Summary: multi-versioning not GC safe
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56672
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2013-03-21 09:21:59
UTC ---
A program that depends on undefined behaviour cannot be correct.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56656
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56656
--- Comment #14 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-03-21 09:40:13
UTC ---
Fixed for good.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56672
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36996
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-21
09:59:24 UTC ---
*** Bug 56672 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
/install
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --disable-multilib --enable-plugins
--enable-lto --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20130321 (experimental) [trunk revision 196847] (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-shared-libgcc' '-mtune=generic' '-march=x86-64'
/data/vjoost/gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56674
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56675
Bug #: 56675
Summary: I/O: Check edit descriptors with READ/WRITE used in
FORMAT statements
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56674
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56676
Bug #: 56676
Summary: unnecesary splitted load when using avx2
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56677
Bug #: 56677
Summary: [ratio] : ratio_multiply, ratio_divide, etc results
doesnt verify as __is_ratio
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56677
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-21
13:17:15 UTC ---
This is because ratio_divide is a struct, as required by earlier C++0x drafts,
not an alias template as required by the final standard. It's already
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56676
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-21
13:30:42 UTC ---
I believe we split unaligned loads by default because that's faster for generic
tuning.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56677
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56677
--- Comment #3 from npl at chello dot at 2013-03-21 14:38:48 UTC ---
Thanks, this did not occur to me.
Still, wouldnt it be relatively easy to adopt the __is_ratio function to check
for the ::type instead?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56674
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56676
--- Comment #2 from Ondrej Bilka neleai at seznam dot cz 2013-03-21 14:53:26
UTC ---
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:30:42PM +, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56676
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56676
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-21
15:11:14 UTC ---
Well, while true we don't adjust tuning based on that. Use -march=core-avx2
instead.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56678
Bug #: 56678
Summary: [c++11] non-uglified name in chrono
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56676
Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56679
Bug #: 56679
Summary: [C++11] Cannot take sizeof... a template template
parameter pack
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.4
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56680
Bug #: 56680
Summary: ICE for spec2K's 178.galgel and 200.sixtrack for
x86_64 at O3
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56677
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-21
15:35:46 UTC ---
That wouldn't help. The requirement is that the Period template argument is a
ratio. In GCC 4.7 ratio_divide is not a ratio. Whether ratio_divide::type
20130321 (experimental) [trunk revision 196847] (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-O3' '-v' '-shared-libgcc' '-mtune=generic'
'-march=x86-64'
/data/vjoost/gnu/gcc_trunk/install/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.9.0/f951
bug.f90 -quiet -dumpbase bug.f90 -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -auxbase bug -O3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49802
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56681
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56682
Bug #: 56682
Summary: -fsanitize documentation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56681
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-03-21
17:56:41 UTC ---
If I am not mistaken, this PR seems to have been fixed between revisions 196859
(broken) and 196877 (OK).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35203
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36282
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer aldot at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56683
Bug #: 56683
Summary: Function types with different language linkages not
distinct
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56683
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2316
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jed at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-21
20:02:55 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 21 17:36:47 2013
New Revision: 196887
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=196887root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55608
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-21
20:03:19 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 21 17:35:39 2013
New Revision: 196886
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=196886root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39326
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56684
Bug #: 56684
Summary: [4.8 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: unexpected expression
'T' of kind template_parm_index
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56684
Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.8.0 |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56305
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56685
Bug #: 56685
Summary: default template parameter cannot precede a
non-default template parameter in a function
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56686
Bug #: 56686
Summary: gcc cannot find include header file
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56686
--- Comment #1 from Pan Ruochen panruochen at gmail dot com 2013-03-22
02:18:58 UTC ---
Created attachment 29706
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29706
testcase
Testcase for this bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56686
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c
Hi,
When shrink-wrap is enabled, the returns from simple-return path and
normal return path can be merged. The code is like:
tst ...
/ \
| push ...
| ...
| pop ...
\ /
bx lr
If the dwarf info after pop ... is incorrect, the dwarf checks will
fail at
Hi,
The patch is to enable shrink-wrap for TARGET_ARM and TARGET_THUMB2.
Bootstrapped and no make check regression.
All previous Linaro shrink-wrap bugs (http://goo.gl/6fGg5) are verified.
Is it OK?
Thanks!
-Zhenqiang
ChangeLog:
2013-03-21 Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com
I've merged changes from trunk into the c++-concepts branch as of
revision 196857. These include Jason's patch to stop randomness
in linkage name of entities defined at unnamed namespace scopes.
-- Gaby
Moore, Catherine catherine_mo...@mentor.com writes:
I'm sorry for wasting your time. I accidentally posted an older version
of the patch earlier this afternoon.
This is the version that I meant to post and is hopefully a lot closer
to what you are looking for.
I named some of the
*ping *
Tobias Burnus wrote:
Dear all,
this small patch fixes some small issues with the current FINAL
implementation, which is still disabled. Namely:
(a) class.c: TRANSFER has an optional size= argument; if one doesn't
has an actual-argument (which can be expr == NULL), it segfaults.
(b)
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 03/20/2013 08:00 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
Do you at
The attached patch adds the new ATmega*RFR* devices to AVR-GCC.
If there are no objections, someone please commit it.
--
Joerg Wunsch * Development engineer, Dresden, Germany
Atmel Automotive GmbH, Theresienstrasse 2, D-74027 Heilbronn
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Steven A. Laub, Stephen Cumming
Hello!
Attached patch detects assemblers that expects movd instead of movq
for interunit moves and adds fixup code only in case of broken
assembler.
2013-03-21 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
PR bootstrap/56656
* configure.ac (HAVE_AS_IX86_INTERUNIT_MOVQ): New test.
*
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:43 AM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
This was something I spotted while looking at why certain redundant
conditionals were not eliminated. In particular this affects the compiler's
ability to eliminate a variety of gimple checking tests.
Consider an equality
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, David Edelsohn wrote:
The gfortran testsuite on PowerPC now produces a number of new ICEs
when vectorization is enabled:
/tmp/20130320/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran
-B/tmp/20130320/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../
This patch fixes a bug in the std::tuple printer where, if the value
was passed by reference, the printer was not correctly dereferencing the
value before printing.
Cheers,
Phil
2013-03-21 Phil Muldoon pmuld...@redhat.com
PR gdb/15195
* python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, David Edelsohn wrote:
The gfortran testsuite on PowerPC now produces a number of new ICEs
when vectorization is enabled:
/tmp/20130320/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran
-B/tmp/20130320/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../
Rainer Orth r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de writes:
As described in
Don't use DWARF 4 on Solaris
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg00445.html
the Solaris linker couldn't handle CIEv3 in .eh_frame, so we defaulted
to DWARF 2 on Solaris in any configuration (Sun or GNU
OK
/Marcus
On 20 March 2013 17:21, Ian Bolton ian.bol...@arm.com wrote:
MOVK should not be generated with a negative immediate, which
the assembler rightfully rejects.
This patch makes MOVK output its 2nd operand in hex instead.
Tested on bare-metal and linux.
OK for trunk?
Cheers,
Ian
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2013-03-21 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
* tree-ssa-loop-im.c (can_sm_ref_p): Do not test whether
ref is stored in the loop.
(find_refs_for_sm): Walk only over all stores.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
This splits data reference group analysis away from data dependence
checking and splits the latter into loop and a BB vectorization
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:21:57AM -0700, Cary Coutant wrote:
+ if (lookup_decl_die (decl))
+return rtl;
+
+ len = TREE_STRING_LENGTH (t);
+ vec_safe_push (used_rtx_array, rtl);
+ ref = new_die (DW_TAG_dwarf_procedure, comp_unit_die (), decl);
+ array = (unsigned char *)
Hi!
This is a patch I had written two months ago, but concluded it to be too
risky for 4.8 at that point.
The issue this patch attempts to solve is that compiler behaves differently
in some cases depending on if we've just warned about something or if
-Werror has been in effect and that warning
All these builtins need to be documented in doc/.
DONE!
+initialize builtin functions are stored in @file{array-notation-common.c}. In
+the current array notation implementation there are 12 builtin reduction
+operations. Details about these functions and their usage are available in
On 03/21/2013 03:44 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
+
+ if (defstmt
+ is_gimple_assign (defstmt)
+ CONVERT_EXPR_CODE_P (gimple_assign_rhs_code (defstmt)))
+ {
+ tree old_rhs = gimple_assign_rhs1 (defstmt);
+
On 03/21/13 01:09, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:30:58PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 03/20/2013 10:33 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
As I'd mentioned, you have .exp files named compile.exp and execute.exp
which seem to be causing ambiguity problems in parallel checks (make
check
Balaji, please check the corresponding .sum files before and after your patch
to
make sure that the same number of tests are being tested. We have a nifty
script in contrib/compare_tests for this task.
That's how I verify it. (I grep for the ^FAIL in trunk and the applied branch
and make
On 03/21/13 08:06, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
Balaji, please check the corresponding .sum files before and after your patch to
make sure that the same number of tests are being tested. We have a nifty
script in contrib/compare_tests for this task.
That's how I verify it. (I grep for the ^FAIL in
-Original Message-
From: Aldy Hernandez [mailto:al...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 9:09 AM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: Jakub Jelinek; Jeff Law; Joseph S. Myers; gcc-patches
Subject: Re: [patch] cilkplus array notation for C (clean, independent
patchset,
take 1)
On
This patch should be applied to GCC 4.8 and 4.9.
Test results for powerpc-rtems4.11 and arm-rtems4.11:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-03/msg02184.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-03/msg02185.html
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2013-03-21 Sebastian Huber
Sebastian Huber sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de writes:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/builtins.exp
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/builtins.exp
index 45cfadd..1e3359c 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/builtins.exp
+++
This patch should be applied to GCC 4.8 and 4.9.
Test results for powerpc-rtems4.11 and arm-rtems4.11:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-03/msg02184.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-03/msg02185.html
v2: Keep alphabetic order
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2013-03-21 Sebastian
This unifies the mem-ref used to track unanalyzed mems and
assigns it ID zero. This makes it tested first during dependence
testing, acting as early out.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, will apply soon.
Richard.
2013-03-21 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
PR
Phil == Phil Muldoon pmuld...@redhat.com writes:
Phil 2013-03-21 Phil Muldoon pmuld...@redhat.com
Phil PR gdb/15195
I think this should use a full URL.
Otherwise it is going to attach the commit to some random GCC bug.
Phil * python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py (StdTuplePrinter): Convert
I have found some little nits that I will point out in a reply to this
message.
Balaji, in Joseph's last review he mentioned:
In find_rank you have error (Rank Mismatch!); - this is not a properly
formatted error message according to the GNU Coding standards (which
typically would not have
Here is what I have commited (svn 196876.): a few updates were necessary.
Christophe.
2013-03-21 Christophe Lyon christophe.l...@linaro.org
gcc/
* config/arm/arm-protos.h (tune_params): Add
prefer_neon_for_64bits field.
* config/arm/arm.c
Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com writes:
| Hi!
|
| This is a patch I had written two months ago, but concluded it to be too
| risky for 4.8 at that point.
|
| The issue this patch attempts to solve is that compiler behaves differently
| in some cases depending on if we've just warned about
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Joseph, folks, et al... How does this look?
This review largely deals with coding style (interpreted broadly). I'll
review more of the substance separately later; reposting with fixes for
all the accumulated issues is probably a good idea anyway, to
This combines two earlier patches to do the mem-ref-loc rewrite
in one go. It makes the allocation less arcane and avoids
copying all locations by providing an iterator interface from
which we also can exit early.
There is no measuable benefit for the testcase in PR39326, but
this will make
Hi,
this fixes an ICE on the mainline at -O1:
eric@polaris:~/gnat/bugs/M129-026 ~/install/gcc/bin/gcc -S p.adb -O
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 4.9.0 20130320 (experimental) [trunk revision 196816] (x86_64-suse-linux)
GCC error:|
| in
Hi,
I've found a little bit strange code in movmode_internal
RTL-pattern from config/i386/sse.md:
case MODE_V2DF:
if (TARGET_AVX
(misaligned_operand (operands[0], MODEmode)
|| misaligned_operand (operands[1], MODEmode)))
return
Continuing the review for coding style...
diff --git a/gcc/c/c-parser.c b/gcc/c/c-parser.c
+extern bool contains_array_notation_expr (tree);
+extern struct c_expr fix_array_notation_expr (location_t, enum tree_code,
+ struct c_expr);
+extern tree
On Mar 20, 2013, at 11:09 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:30:58PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 03/20/2013 10:33 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
As I'd mentioned, you have .exp files named compile.exp and execute.exp
which seem to be causing ambiguity problems in
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:47 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux again, tested also on
the testcase from the PR (gdb apparently still hasn't been fixed so its
issues are still there, but the output looks good from gcc and at least
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Michael Zolotukhin
michael.v.zolotuk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've found a little bit strange code in movmode_internal
RTL-pattern from config/i386/sse.md:
case MODE_V2DF:
if (TARGET_AVX
(misaligned_operand (operands[0],
Dear all,
using VALUE, gfortran passes the arguments by value.* That works well,
except if VALUE is combined with OPTIONAL. Currently, call foo(0) and
call foo() are indistinguishable.
With this patch, a hidden argument is added which includes the present
information. I think that's the
Hi all,
This patch adds a splitter variant of the minmax_arithsi pattern for when
the operator
is non-commutative (MINUS) and the ordering of the operands is not
canonical.
That is, it will trigger for:
#define MAX(a, b) (a b ? a : b)
int
foo (int a, int b, int c)
{
return c - MAX (a,b);
}
Please see my response below:
-Original Message-
From: Aldy Hernandez [mailto:al...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 10:25 AM
To: Joseph S. Myers
Cc: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc-patches
Subject: Re: [patch] cilkplus array notation for C (clean, independent
patchset,
take 1)
Hello!
2013-03-21 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* config/i386/i386.md (*movdi_internal): Disparage slightly
all MMX moves to/from memory. Use Yi instead of x for SSE-MMX
conversion alternatives.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed to mainline.
Uros.
Index:
Hi,
The following change
2012-05-03 Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_code_end): Set DECL_IGNORED_P on the
pc thunk.
* dwarf2out.c (output_aranges): Skip DECL_IGNORED_P functions.
(dwarf2out_finish): Likewise.
caused the length field of a
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 09:23:34PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
The following change
2012-05-03 Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_code_end): Set DECL_IGNORED_P on the
pc thunk.
* dwarf2out.c (output_aranges): Skip DECL_IGNORED_P functions.
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
