Hi,
In loop vectorization, I found that vectorizer insists on loop peeling even our
target supports misaligned memory access. This results in much bigger code size
for a very simple loop. I defined TARGET_VECTORIZE_SUPPORT_VECTOR_MISALGINMENT
and also TARGET_VECTORIZE_BUILTIN_VECTORIZATION_COST
On 11/15/2013 04:07 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
this code from fold-const.c starts on line 13811.
else if (TREE_INT_CST_HIGH (arg1) == signed_max_hi
TREE_INT_CST_LOW (arg1) == signed_max_lo
TYPE_UNSIGNED (arg1_type)
/* We will flip the
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Bingfeng Mei b...@broadcom.com wrote:
Hi,
In loop vectorization, I found that vectorizer insists on loop peeling even
our target supports misaligned memory access. This results in much bigger
code size for a very simple loop. I defined
Hi, Richard,
Speed difference is 154 cycles (with workaround) vs. 198 cycles. So loop
peeling is also slower for our processors.
By vectorization_cost, do you mean TARGET_VECTORIZE_BUILTIN_VECTORIZATION_COST
hook?
In our case, it is easy to make decision. But generally, if peeling loop is
Let's suppose, we are going to run target gcc driver from lto-wrapper.
How could a list of offload targets be passed there from option
parser?
In my opinion, the simpliest way to do it is to use environment
variable. Would you agree with such approach?
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Jakub
Also keep in mind that usually costs go up significantly if
misalignment causes cache line splits (processor will fetch 2 lines).
There are non-linear costs of filling up the store queue in modern
out-of-order processors (x86). Bottom line is that it's much better to
peel e.g. for AVX2/AVX3 if the
The right longer term fix is suggested by Richard. For now you can
probably override the peel parameter for your target (in the target
option_override function).
maybe_set_param_value (PARAM_VECT_MAX_PEELING_FOR_ALIGNMENT,
0, opts-x_param_values, opts_set-x_param_values);
David
In the below test case, CASE_A actually uses a frame pointer, while
!CASE_A doesn't. I can't imagine this is a feature, this is a bug,
isn't it? Is there any reason the compiler couldn't know that
loop_blocks never needs a dynamic stack size?
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
#define MY_DEFINE
Thanks for the suggestion. It seems that parameter is only available in HEAD,
not in 4.8. I will backport to 4.8.
However, implementing a good cost model seems quite tricky to me. There are
conflicting requirements for different processors. For us or many embedded
processors, 4-time size
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Hendrik Greving
hendrik.greving.in...@gmail.com wrote:
In the below test case, CASE_A actually uses a frame pointer, while
!CASE_A doesn't. I can't imagine this is a feature, this is a bug,
isn't it? Is there any reason the compiler couldn't know that
I agree it is hard to tune cost model to make it precise.
Trunk compiler now supports better command line control for cost model
selection. It seems to me that you can backport that change (as well
as changes to control loop and slp vectorizer with different options)
to your branch. With those,
Hi,
float.h has
/* Addition rounds to 0: zero, 1: nearest, 2: +inf, 3: -inf, -1: unknown. */
/* ??? This is supposed to change with calls to fesetround in fenv.h. */
#undef FLT_ROUNDS
#define FLT_ROUNDS 1
Clang introduces __builtin_flt_rounds and
#define FLT_ROUNDS (__builtin_flt_rounds())
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013, H.J. Lu wrote:
Hi,
float.h has
/* Addition rounds to 0: zero, 1: nearest, 2: +inf, 3: -inf, -1: unknown. */
/* ??? This is supposed to change with calls to fesetround in fenv.h. */
#undef FLT_ROUNDS
#define FLT_ROUNDS 1
Clang introduces __builtin_flt_rounds and
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 09:17:14AM -0800, Hendrik Greving wrote:
Also keep in mind that usually costs go up significantly if
misalignment causes cache line splits (processor will fetch 2 lines).
There are non-linear costs of filling up the store queue in modern
out-of-order processors (x86).
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:26:06PM +0100, Ondřej Bílka wrote:
Minor correction, a mutt read replaced a set1.s file by one that I later
used for avx2 variant. A correct file is following
.file set1.c
.text
.p2align 4,,15
.globl set
.type set, @function
Everything handling __int128 would be updated to work with a
target-determined set of types instead.
Preferably, the number of such keywords would be arbitrary (so I suppose
there would be a single RID_INTN for them) - that seems cleaner than the
system for address space keywords with a
This patch fixes a number of places where the mode bitsize had been used
but the mode precision should have been used. The tree level is
somewhat sloppy about this - some places use the mode precision and some
use the mode bitsize. It seems that the mode precision is the proper
choice
Folks --
It's been a long time since I've posted to the GCC mailing list because (as is
rather obvious) I haven't been directly involved in GCC development for quite
some time. As of today, I'm no longer at Mentor Graphics (the company that
acquired CodeSourcery), so I no longer even have a
On 11/15/2013 2:26 PM, Ondřej Bílka wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 09:17:14AM -0800, Hendrik Greving wrote:
Also keep in mind that usually costs go up significantly if
misalignment causes cache line splits (processor will fetch 2 lines).
There are non-linear costs of filling up the store queue
On 11/15/13 18:33, Mark Mitchell wrote:
I'd very much like to thank all who are, have been, or will be
developers and maintainers of GCC. Of course, I'm particularly
grateful to those who reviewed my patches, fixed the bugs I
introduced, endured my nit-picking reviews of their patches, and so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59063
--- Comment #18 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
(In reply to Evgeniy Stepanov from comment #17)
Sorry, I forgot to mention this. Should be done in r194372.
Thanks! A pity this isn't going to help in gcc case that much because of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58543
Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58937
--- Comment #13 from Evgeniy Stepanov eugeni.stepanov at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Yury Gribov from comment #12)
(In reply to Evgeniy Stepanov from comment #8)
... one of the ASan interceptors
that does ENSURE_ASAN_INITED().
Arguably,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57756
--- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Yuri Rumyantsev from comment #7)
Created attachment 31217 [details]
Additioanl patch for r203634.
-- gcc-patches@...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59139
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59138
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59136
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59121
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59140
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58533
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
Seems fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59144
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to tmmikolajczyk from comment #0)
The compilation passes (on gcc and clang). It's quite weird that the
virtualism of the X::bar method has such an impact.
But that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994
--- Comment #21 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kcc
Date: Fri Nov 15 10:31:14 2013
New Revision: 204838
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204838root=gccview=rev
Log:
fix PR sanitizer/58994
Modified:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58930
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50262
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I finally have a patch ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59145
Bug ID: 59145
Summary: apache compilation in AIX 7.1 - erro while starting
the apache server
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59145
balamuruganpalani at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59145
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54040
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Nov 15 12:06:25 2013
New Revision: 204840
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204840root=gccview=rev
Log:
Add and use System.Linux.time_t for time_t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59136
--- Comment #6 from Alexey Samsonov samsonov at google dot com ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
No processes should be launched at all. Blocks the release - please make it
at least configurable to be able to turn it off.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106
--- Comment #11 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Trying to build chrome with gcc's asan...
The build barks as in this bug -- we do need to build libsanitizer (at least
asan) with -fno-rtti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106
--- Comment #12 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
(In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #11)
The build barks as in this bug
Did it work with the patch?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59131
--- Comment #2 from Holger Machens machens at tuhh dot de ---
Created attachment 31224
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31224action=edit
Test case to reproduce the bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59063
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59146
Bug ID: 59146
Summary: Segfault when ommiting '' in 'bind (C) ' procedure
call
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106
--- Comment #13 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Did it work with the patch?
Yes!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59125
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59125
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Related bug is PR54570.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59146
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59147
Bug ID: 59147
Summary: 128-bit division error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56703
Yves Caniou yves.can...@ens-lyon.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59147
--- Comment #1 from rglindley at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 31227
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31227action=edit
compiler information
Output from following:
gfortran -v -save-temps -Wall -Wextra division_test.f90
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57756
--- Comment #9 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com ---
Hi Uros,
I decided that the bug owner should fix it and send my patch (or
modified one) for review to GCC community, i.e. I was not planning to
fix it. But if I should do it pls
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59147
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
It works for me on powerpc-apple-darwin9 (with -m64), x86_64-apple-darwin10,
and x86_64-apple-darwin13. It looks like a bug in the 128-bit library of
x86_64-w64-mingw32.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50262
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Nov 15 14:48:22 2013
New Revision: 204845
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204845root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-11-15 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50262
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59131
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58533
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28811
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59108
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59147
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-w64-mingw32
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59061
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Just tried to bootstrap/regtest that patch, unfortunately it doesn't build at
all on i686. Is it meant to work on x86_64 only (or only for
SANITIZER_WORDSIZE == 64)?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994
Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59122
Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59099
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
===
# of expected passes648
# of unexpected failures2
# of unsupported tests202
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc49-4.9.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/xgcc version 4.9.0
20131115 (experimental) (GCC)
Compiler version: 4.9.0 20131115 (experimental) (GCC)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin13.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59061
--- Comment #25 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #24)
Just tried to bootstrap/regtest that patch, unfortunately it doesn't build
at all on i686. Is it meant to work on x86_64 only (or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26205
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10541
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeffp at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58666
Tom Tromey tromey at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58572
Tom Tromey tromey at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58572
Tom Tromey tromey at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tromey at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59133
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I've started to work on it. The problem is in that LRA has not enough code to
deal with creation of pseudos out of its scope. I guess the fix will be ready
next week on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59148
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59149
Bug ID: 59149
Summary: diagnose_tm_1 calls flags_from_decl_or_type on an
ADDR_EXPR
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58599
Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58599
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
Oh, nice. Yes will do.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59143
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59148
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu ---
Also confirmed that if you compile the failing test case using current
llvm/clang svn with...
/sw/opt/llvm-3.4/bin/clang -fsanitize=address -g -fdiagnostics-color=never -O0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59143
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59108
--- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jb
Date: Fri Nov 15 22:00:36 2013
New Revision: 204864
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204864root=gccview=rev
Log:
When file status is unknown, don't set O_CREAT when
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59061
--- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
libbacktrace doesn't use malloc (unless mmap isn't supported), handles inline
frames just fine and Ian has posted today a patch to support also data symbol
lookups. I think I'll post
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59019
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
This has gone latent. Regardless it's relatively easy to fix things up in
combine -- which does similar kinds of things when it's able to collapse a
conditional jump to an unconditional
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59108
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58599
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Nov 15 23:17:23 2013
New Revision: 204866
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204866root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-11-15 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58599
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616
Bug 58616 depends on bug 58599, which changed state.
Bug 58599 Summary: [c++11] Trouble with non-static data member initializers in
templates
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58599
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58829
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
This is also fixed in mainline. I'm adding the testcase and closing the bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58725
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
Fixed in mainline. I'm adding the testcase and closing the bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58188
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
This is also fixed in mainline. I'm adding the testcase and closing the bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57949
--- Comment #9 from Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uweigand
Date: Fri Nov 15 23:39:50 2013
New Revision: 204870
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204870root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc:
2013-11-15 Ulrich Weigand
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59150
Bug ID: 59150
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE: in expand_one_var, at
cfgexpand.c:1242 with -fopenmp
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58188
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Nov 15 23:51:23 2013
New Revision: 204881
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204881root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-11-15 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58725
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Nov 15 23:51:23 2013
New Revision: 204881
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204881root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-11-15 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58829
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Nov 15 23:51:23 2013
New Revision: 204881
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204881root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-11-15 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58829
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58188
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616
Bug 58616 depends on bug 58829, which changed state.
Bug 58829 Summary: non-static member initializer in nested template class
produces incorrect compile error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58829
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616
Bug 58616 depends on bug 58188, which changed state.
Bug 58188 Summary: ICE in gimple_add_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:738
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58188
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616
Bug 58616 depends on bug 58725, which changed state.
Bug 58725 Summary: segfault with non-static member initializer in a nested
struct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58725
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58725
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
1 - 100 of 289 matches
Mail list logo
