Hi Karel,
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Rainer Orth
> wrote:
>> Hi Karel,
>>
>>> More information: It looks like gcc driver invokes cc1 with -P option
>>> which switches off linemakers on Solaris. On Linux cc1 is invoked
>>> without -P and so linemakers are presented. The question is why on
Hi Rainer,
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Rainer Orth
wrote:
> Hi Karel,
>
>> More information: It looks like gcc driver invokes cc1 with -P option
>> which switches off linemakers on Solaris. On Linux cc1 is invoked
>> without -P and so linemakers are presented. The question is why on
>> Solar
Hi Karel,
> More information: It looks like gcc driver invokes cc1 with -P option
> which switches off linemakers on Solaris. On Linux cc1 is invoked
> without -P and so linemakers are presented. The question is why on
> Solaris -P is added to the options since I don't use it myself. It's
> insert
More information: It looks like gcc driver invokes cc1 with -P option
which switches off linemakers on Solaris. On Linux cc1 is invoked
without -P and so linemakers are presented. The question is why on
Solaris -P is added to the options since I don't use it myself. It's
inserted by gcc itself...
On 08/08/14 06:18, Evgeniya Maenkova wrote:
As far as I know, there are so many configurations (frontends x
backends x applications(benchmarks) x etc), that the same optimization
could improve performance in one configuration and degrade at other
conditions.
Correct.
What performance tests do
Hello,
GHC (Haskell compiler) is using builtin gcc's cpp for its cpp
capability. The problem is a little bit different behaviour on
different platform which I observed. As one of GHC's testcases
completely unrelated to gcc's cpp we use:
{-# LANGUAGE CPP #-}
module T7145b ( A.Applicative(pure) ) w
Dear GCC Developers!
Could you please clarify about GIMPLE loop passes?
Where could I find the latest changes in these passes? Is it trunk or
some of the branches? May I look at some RoadMap on GIMPLE loop
optimizations?
Actually, I ask these questions because I would like to contribute to
GCC.
Dear GCC Developers!
May I ask you regarding how you make a decision whether implement some
optimization or not?
As far as I know, there are so many configurations (frontends x
backends x applications(benchmarks) x etc), that the same optimization
could improve performance in one configuration and
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> Currently, we treat predicates as "second-class" citizens:
> - assume any identifier as a valid predicate
> - cannot write more complex predicates than an identifier in match-op
>
> I was wondering whether it would be a good idea
> to av
