Hi,
The first patch backports the fix of PR
target/64011(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64011) to the 4.9
branch from trunk r219717,
and the second patch backports the fix of PR
target/61749(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61749) to the 4.9
branch from trunk r215046.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66296
Mikhail Maltsev miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||miyuki at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66294
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 07:08:35PM +0200, Torvald Riegel wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 17:55 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/RCU/consume.2015.05.18a.pdf
I have been discussing Section 7.9 with Paul during last week.
While I think that 7.9 helps narrow
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66296
Bug ID: 66296
Summary: Gcc generated wrong code with uint16_t add/sub even
with no optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66296
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
On 05/25/2015 09:27 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2015-05-22 15:01 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
2015-05-22 11:53 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
2015-05-21 22:08 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com:
So, Ilya, to solve the problem you need to avoid
I am not sure if TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT is really needed here. What I know is
that
complete types may have incomplete variants.
How can that be? TYPE_FIELDS is shared across variants and all variants
should be layed out.
Because TYPE_FILEDS are not always shared across variants. For
Hi,
this patch makes it possible for non-LTO alias oracle to TBAA disambiguate
pointer types. It makes void * conflicting with all of them and does not put it
to alias set 0. It also preserves the property that qualifiers of pointer-to
type should not matter to determine the alias set and that
I am not sure if TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT is really needed here. What I know is
that
complete types may have incomplete variants.
How can that be? TYPE_FIELDS is shared across variants and all variants
should be layed out.
Because TYPE_FILEDS are not always shared across
Jakub pointed out a formatting issue with one of my recent memory leak
patches. It was a tabs vs spaces issue.
This trivial patch replaces spaces with tabs where appropriate in
tree-ssa-threadedge.c. It has no functional changes.
Bootstrapped and regression tested (as part of a
Segher suggested that the change to favor (plus (ashift (...))) as a
split point be conditionalized on the shift count being a constant --
seems quite reasonable to me.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu as well as
verified the 300+ test files generate the same code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66287
--- Comment #1 from Mitsuru Kariya kariya_mitsuru at hotmail dot com ---
I found several examples that cause the similar error message.
=== sample code 1 ===
constexpr int copy(const int v)
{
return v;
}
constexpr const int
On powerpc64le, modifying the way combine treats function parameters
and call arguments results in some regressions.
For instance, this testcase from varasm.c
extern int foo3 (void *, ...);
extern void foo4 (void *, const char *);
int
emit_tls_common (void *decl,
const char
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66285
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35623
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35623action=edit
par-2.c.129t.parloops
For -DINDEX_TYPE=int, par-2.c.129t.parloops
On Mon, 25 May 2015, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Richard,
here is next patch of the series. It adds all the logic for defining type
equivalence that globs all complete types together in order to make incomplete
type equivalent to every complete variant.
Effect of recursing on pointers
As explained in the previous change, Remove_Side_Effects already knows to
avoid renaming function calls in most cases and, more generally, to avoid
renaming something that does not denote a name. But the implementation is
a little ad-hoc and not bullet-proof, for example a function call subject
to
Cleanup the initial version of this patch.
No further test needed.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2015-05-26 Javier Miranda mira...@adacore.com
* sem_aggr.adb (Resolve_Aggregate, Resolve_Extension_Aggregate):
Code cleanup.
* sem_ch3.adb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64525
--- Comment #2 from Maxim Kuvyrkov mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Kugan's work-in-progress patches may fix this one.
On 05/25/2015 07:41 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Index: include/debug/functions.tcc
===
--- include/debug/functions.tcc (revision 0)
+++ include/debug/functions.tcc (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
+// Debugging support
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66215
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
In case somebody forces any of the torture options into the default through
--target_board=unix/WHATEVER that will result in testing some option
combination multiple times and -O0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66286
Bug ID: 66286
Summary: Inconsistent handling of array sections
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority:
In Ada, the result of evaluating a function call is a constant object and,
therefore, can be subject to a renaming. This is fully implemented in the
compiler by creating a temporary to capture the return value, either in gigi
for simple cases or in the front-end for more convoluted cases.
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66142
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
On Fri, 22 May 2015, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Index: emit-rtl.c
===
--- emit-rtl.c(revision 223508)
+++ emit-rtl.c(working copy)
@@ -1787,8 +1787,15 @@ set_mem_attributes_minus_bitpos (rtx ref
memset (attrs, 0,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66285
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35624
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35624action=edit
par-2.c.130t.ompexpssa
par-2.c.130t.ompexpssa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66285
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35625
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35625action=edit
par-2.c.131t.ifcvt
par-2.c.131t.ifcvt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64045
Maxim Kuvyrkov mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jgreenhalgh
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 06:39:36AM +0100, Kumar, Venkataramanan wrote:
Ping!
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On
Behalf Of Kumar, Venkataramanan
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 9:07 PM
To: James Greenhalgh
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 09:24:20AM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
It occurs to me that in the IOR-of-shifts form of the rev16 operation we
should be costing the operand properly. For that we'd want to reuse the
aarch_rev16_p function that does all the heavy lifting and get it to write
On Fri, 22 May 2015, Jan Hubicka wrote:
And no, I'm hesitant to change operand_equal_p too much. It's
very much deep-rooted into GENERIC.
OK, as another option, i can bring relevant logic from operand_equal_p
to ipa-icf and separate it into the compare_operand class like I did.
Use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66285
Bug ID: 66285
Summary: failure to vectorize parallelized loop
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66285
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35626
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35626action=edit
par-2.c.132t.vect
par-2.c.132t.vect
On Mon, 25 May 2015, Dharmakan Rohit Arul Raj wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Richard Biener [mailto:rguent...@suse.de]
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 1:06 PM
To: Jeff Law
Cc: Dharmakan Rohit-B30502; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Jakub Jelinek; Alan
Modra; David Edelsohn; Wienskoski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66285
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66272
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Since the move to C++14 is now imminent, I regtested/bootstrapped
the patch with -Wshift-overflow always enabled for C++ and that
went well.
Marek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66276
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Ping.
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 04:07:53PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
This PR points out that we output same -Wformat warning twice when using
__attribute__ ((format)). The problem was that attribute_value_equal
(called when processing merge_attributes) got two lists:
format printf, 1, 2 and
Hi,
My first part patch improving how we handle overflow in scev is posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-05/msg01795.html . Here comes the
second part patch.
This patch does below improvements:
1) Computes and records control iv for each loop's exit edge. This
provides a way to
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 07:05:14AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
The attached patch activates the -mtune=native and -march=native
command line options on S390 and System z. Most of the code is a
modified copy of gcc/config/mips/driver-native.c. ChangeLog
attached.
Version 2 of the patch to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66288
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Note that for the example from PR66285, with INDEX_TYPE long/unsigned long, we
vectorize without run-time aliasing test.
In that example, we start out with two restrict pointers. During aliasing,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65701
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66252
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66275
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-w64-mingw32 |
--- Comment #2
Hi,
The first part patch improving how we handle overflow in scev is
posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-05/msg01795.html .
Here comes the second part patch.
This patch does below improvements:
1) Computes and records control iv for each loop's exit edge. This
provides a way to
On Fri, 22 May 2015, Jan Hubicka wrote:
+ case OBJ_TYPE_REF:
+ {
+ if (!operand_equal_p (OBJ_TYPE_REF_EXPR (arg0),
+ OBJ_TYPE_REF_EXPR (arg1), flags))
+ return false;
+ if (flag_devirtualize virtual_method_call_p (arg0))
+ {
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
Hello,
I noticed we were only doing this transformation for floats and not for
integers, so I took the chance to move it to match.pd. Regtested on
ppc64le-redhat-linux.
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
2015-05-25 Marc Glisse
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 09:30:18AM +0100, Matthew Wahab wrote:
[Added PR number and updated patches]
This patch adds tests for the code generated by the Aarch64 backend for the
__sync builtins.
Tested aarch64-none-linux-gnu with check-gcc.
Ok for trunk?
Matthew
This is OK once the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66252
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66288
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Before parallelization, we have:
...
doubleD.32 dataD.1837[1000];
doubleD.32 resultsD.1836[1000];
...
# VUSE .MEM_19
_6 = dataD.1837[idx_18];
_7 = _6 *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65752
--- Comment #34 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Sat, 23 May 2015, gil.hur at sf dot snu.ac.kr wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65752
--- Comment #33 from Chung-Kil Hur gil.hur at sf dot
A few files I added earlier this year are missing 2015 in the list of
copyright years, because I forgot to update them when moving them from
local branches to the FSF repo.
Committed to trunk.
commit 378bbf405af6b83dd44c9d92b6e819a0af3e7697
Author: Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com
Date: Tue
On 06 Apr 09:28, Jeff Law wrote:
On 04/06/2015 09:17 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
To tell the truth, I can't figure out what this means from a user
perspective. How does a user know whether the linker option is
being ignored, or if they have a new enough linker? If the linker
available at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66255
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66142
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 25 May 2015, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66142
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
On 26/05/15 09:45 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
On 05/25/2015 07:41 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Index: include/debug/functions.tcc
===
--- include/debug/functions.tcc (revision 0)
+++ include/debug/functions.tcc (working copy)
@@ -0,0
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:12:55AM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
This patch adds a mention of the new native cpu detection feature in aarch64
GNU/Linux. Gerald, this is a patch against htdocs/gcc-6/changes.html and I
thought I had seen the 'changes' link in gcc.gnu.org earlier but I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59759
--- Comment #12 from Gereon Kremer gereon.kremer at cs dot rwth-aachen.de ---
And once again.
I just upgraded to gcc 5.1.0
Sure enough, it's not fixed...
Test_GCC.cpp: In substitution of ‘templateclass T void f(const AT*) [with T
= missing]’:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979
--- Comment #29 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
BTW, there is still one unresolved known problem which can silently generate
wrong code: PR 56451
Although the testsuite FAIL might have disappeared, the issue hasn't been
actually
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66289
Bug ID: 66289
Summary: [5/6 Regression] error: ambiguous template
instantiation with partial specialization defined in
terms of alias template
Product: gcc
On 13/05/15 11:16, Christian Bruel wrote:
- [2.2/6]: Redefine TARGET_MACROS for #pragma GCC target without
thumbness the glue.
Here it is, no regression for
arm-sim/
arm-sim//-march=armv7-a
arm-sim//-mthumb
arm-sim//-mthumb/-march=armv7-a
Obviously, [4/6],[5/6] and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59759
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66289
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66269
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66289
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
This refactors code to arrange that for loop SLP we pass in the SLP
node and instance to the vectorizable_* functions also at analysis
phase (not only at transform phase).
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to trunk.
Richard.
2015-05-26 Richard Biener
One of my dev trees had this.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to trunk.
Richard.
2015-05-26 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
* fold-const.c (fold_binary_loc): Move X % -Y - X % Y and
X % C - X (C - 1) for C being a power-of two to ...
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66289
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66082
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: pault
Date: Tue May 26 10:20:41 2015
New Revision: 223677
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223677root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-05-26 Paul Thomas pa...@gcc.gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66214
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Seems to be fixed by Honza's patch at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-05/msg02225.html / by his commit
r223608.
Should the test case be test-cased?
This patch ensures that assertion policy Ignore interacts properly with aspect
Type_Invariant'Class.
-- Source --
-- pack_type_invariant_class.ads
pragma Assertion_Policy (Type_Invariant'Class = Ignore);
package Pack_Type_Invariant_Class is
type Priv_Typ is tagged
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Evgeniya Maenkova
evgeniya.maenk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Could you please review my patch for predicated lim?
Let me note some details about it:
1) Phi statements are still moved only if they have 1 or 2
arguments. However, phi statements could be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66290
Bug ID: 66290
Summary: wrong location for -Wunused-macros
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
This implements a new aspect Disable_Controlled which can only be
used for controlled record types. It causes suppression of related
calls to Initialize, Adjust, Finalize (for conditional compilation
purposes).
The following test:
1. with Ada.Finalization; use Ada.Finalization;
2. with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66287
Bug ID: 66287
Summary: [C++11] A constexpr variable of const int* const
cannot be initialized
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Ping
2015-05-19 12:40 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
Ping
2015-05-05 11:06 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
Ping
2015-04-14 12:14 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
On 10 Apr 03:15, Jan Hubicka wrote:
References are not streamed out for
Ping
2015-05-19 12:39 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
Ping
2015-05-05 11:05 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
Ping
2015-04-14 17:35 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
On 10 Apr 03:27, Jan Hubicka wrote:
+ /* We might propagate instrumented
Hi,
I am not sure if suggested fix is the thing we want here. But infact
having here a VAR_DECL can be caused by prior errors introducing them.
So we simply might want to treat VAR_DECL in unify via
unify_template_argument_mismatch.
Tested for 5.x branch, and trunk. Ok for apply?
Kai
This update allows the use of the following restrictions pragmas
in package System:
No_Specification_Of_Aspect
No_Use_Of_Attribute
No_Use_Of_Pragma
Given a system.ads file containing the lines:
pragma Restrictions (No_Use_Of_Pragma = Attach_Handler);
pragma Restrictions
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
I forgot to mention I optimistically tried to write something like this:
(match
(negated_value_for_comparison @0)
(negate @0))
(match
(negated_value_for_comparison (negate @0))
@0)
(match
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46032
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #11)
The ipa-pta solution no longer works. In 4.6, we had:
...
# USE = anything
# CLB = anything
GOMP_parallel_startD.1048
Previously, A**B could give different results for float and
long float depending on whether B was a small static constant
in the range 2..4 or a variable with the same value. Although
both values are valid, this discrepancy is undesirable, both
for general use and in particular for formal analysis
The new debug switch -gnatd.k suppresses occurrences of line numbers
within error messages referring to a location in an internal file.
The following test normally compiles as follows (with -gnatj55)
1. with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO;
2. with Ada.Containers.Vectors;
3.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66241
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46032
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66181
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vp at
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
PR 66181 is about ICE in verify_type that complains that type and its variant
differs
by TYPE_NO_FORCE_BLK. This flag is kind-of internal to stor-layout.c, so the
divergence
may not matter (I am not sure about it as
Hi,
My first part patch improving how we handle overflow in scev is posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-05/msg01795.html . Here comes the
second part patch.
This patch does below improvements:
1) Computes and records control iv for each loop's exit edge. This
provides a way to
On Thu, 14 May 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 20-04-15 14:25, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 03-04-15 14:39, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 27-03-15 15:10, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
this patch fixes PR65443, a todo in the parloops pass for
This change ensures on all targets that A**B = A**C when B is a small
static constant in the range 0 .. 4 and C is a variable with the same
value. Previously for Float and Long_Float on some targets, this was
not the case. The results given were both within the error bounds that
are allowed by the
This patch fixes a visibility error on a subtype of a derived private type,
when the enclosing unit is both the parent of an instantiated generic child
unit, and contains an expression function that is automatically inlined.
The following must compile and execute quietly:
gnatmake -q main
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66215
--- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominik Vogt from comment #22)
Created attachment 35628 [details]
Experimental fix 5
Version 5 with the suggested changes and a new test case. Hopefully the
last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66285
--- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
I thought that parallelizing vectorized loops is harder (you eventually get
extra prologue and epliogue loops, etc).
Another example, par-4.c:
...
GCC built with latest binutils and the patch give the following
performance improve:
spec2000INT +3% at -O2 -m32, +1,5% at -O2 -m64.
Some other benchmark scores at -O2 were also improved up to 6%.
The patch is very efficient for PIE mode.
Thanks,
Evgeny
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:30 PM, H.J. Lu
On Tue, 19 May 2015, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
I've just noticed that we, for default configuration, produce just 30
partitions.
I'm wondering whether that's fine, or it would be necessary to re-tune
partitioning
algorithm to produce better balanced map?
Attached patch is used to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66275
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
On 26/05/15 09:58, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
PR 66181 is about ICE in verify_type that complains that type and its variant
differs
by TYPE_NO_FORCE_BLK. This flag is kind-of internal to stor-layout.c, so the
divergence
may
Hi, Richard
Thanks for review starting.
Do you see any major issues with this patch (i.e. algorithms and ideas
that should be completely replaced, effectively causing the re-write
of most code)?
To decide if there are major issues in the patch, perhaps, you need
additional clarifications from
This patch extends the machinery which detects dangerous order
dependencies caused by out-mode parameters of Ada 2012 functions
(AI-0144) to detect the error in array aggregates that have a
nonstatic range (RM 6.20/3).
The compiler now catches the error in the following sources:
pragma Ada_2012;
1 - 100 of 216 matches
Mail list logo
