https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66273
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66285
--- Comment #8 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
For example par-4.c, if we use the same patch to interchange the passes, we
get:
When not parallelizing, all loops get vectorized:
...
parloops_factor: 0, index_type: int:
vectorized: 1,
On 05/25/2015 08:29 PM, Andreas Tobler wrote:
Ok for trunk?
OK, thanks.
Andrew.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66215
Dominik Vogt vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #35599|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66264
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64045
James Greenhalgh jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 02:21:16PM +0200, Kai Tietz wrote:
Hi,
I am not sure if suggested fix is the thing we want here. But infact
having here a VAR_DECL can be caused by prior errors introducing them.
So we simply might want to treat VAR_DECL in unify via
An arbitrary restriction was imposed on renaming in conjunction with the new
Aspect/Pragma Volatile_Full_Access for implementation reasons: the compiler
was rejecting renamings of components of Volatile_Full_Access objects.
It is lifted by this change and the following package must now be
On 26 May 2015 at 18:25, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 22 April 2015 at 19:36, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
In the first revision of Christophe Lyon's advsimd-intrinsics tests,
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg00532.html ,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66293
Bug ID: 66293
Summary: Support -Weverything to enable all warnings
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66142
--- Comment #13 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com ---
Original test-case is not vectorized yet with Richard patch for sccvn.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66049
--- Comment #9 from vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vekumar
Date: Tue May 26 15:32:02 2015
New Revision: 223703
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223703root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-05-26 Venkataramanan Kumar
Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 22 April 2015 at 19:36, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
In the first revision of Christophe Lyon's advsimd-intrinsics tests,
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg00532.html , both
gcc-dg-runtest (to assemble only) and c-torture-execute were used. In
w.r.t. the PR48052, here is the patch which finds out if scev would wrap or not.
The patch symbolically evaluates if valid_niter = loop-nb_iterations is true.
In that case the scev would not wrap.
Currently, we only look for two special 'patterns', which are sufficient to
analyze the test cases.
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Lynn A. Boger
labo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 05/22/2015 05:50 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Andrew Chambers
andrewchambe...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not suggesting breaking go conventions, I just think the default if
no
Hi,
On Fri, 22 May 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
It's currently regstrapping on x86_64-linux, okay for trunk if that
passes?
OK.
r223704 now. I've tried to also add the fortran runtime testcase from the
PR that now exists, but failed. The gfortran.dg/vect testsuite is strange
and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46032
--- Comment #16 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12)
(In reply to vries from comment #11)
The ipa-pta solution no longer works. In 4.6, we had:
...
# USE = anything
# CLB = anything
On 05/06/2015 12:28 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 05/05/2015 04:33 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 05/05/2015 02:08 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 05/04/2015 09:29 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
The code handling parameter DIEs needed a little tweaking for variable
length template arguments. I've relaxed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59124
--- Comment #14 from Georg Müller georgmueller at gmx dot net ---
sorry, a small typo in the last line of the last message: there was no problem
with fedora 21, not 22...
Thanks James
Committed as https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revisionrevision=223703
Regards,
Venkat.
-Original Message-
From: James Greenhalgh [mailto:james.greenha...@arm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 2:09 PM
To: Kumar, Venkataramanan
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Marcus
This change ensures on all targets that A**B = A**C when B is a small
static constant in the range 0 .. 4 and C is a variable with the same
value. Previously for Float and Long_Float on some targets, this was
not the case. The results given were both within the error bounds that
are allowed
When an object is declared with an initializing expression and has its
elaboration delayed, the following code in gnat_to_gnu is invoked:
/* If this object has its elaboration delayed, we must force
evaluation of GNU_EXPR right now and save it for when the object
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66288
Bug ID: 66288
Summary: parallelized loop vectorized with runtime alias check
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66263
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
The following fixes the testcase in PR66142
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to trunk.
Richard.
2015-05-26 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
PR tree-optimization/66142
* tree-ssa-sccvn.c (vn_reference_lookup_3): Manually compare
MEM_REFs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46032
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13)
So there's no longer a path in the call graph from main to main._omp_fn.
Perhaps a dummy body for GOMP_parallel could fix that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65752
--- Comment #36 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 26 May 2015, gil.hur at sf dot snu.ac.kr wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65752
--- Comment #35 from Chung-Kil Hur gil.hur at sf dot
On 05/26/2015 08:07 AM, Aditya Kumar wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-05-26 Aditya Kumar hiradi...@msn.com
* auto-profile.c (afdo_calculate_branch_prob): Break once has_sample
is true.
OK. Please install onto the trunk.
Thanks,
jeff
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66291
Bug ID: 66291
Summary: [OOP] Incorrect compile time warning for final
procedure in gfortran
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
We don't need the C99-like treatment if we don't expect NaN's.
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied on the mainline.
2015-05-26 Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com
* gcc-interface/trans.c (Attribute_to_gnu) Attr_Min/Attr_Max: Do not
bother about NaN's if Machine_Overflows is
Chung-Lin posted this patch last year but it seems never to have been
reviewed:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg00714.html
I've just re-applied and re-tested it and it still seems to be good.
Can somebody please take a look at it?
-Sandra
An arbitrary restriction was imposed on renaming in conjunction with the new
Aspect/Pragma Volatile_Full_Access for implementation reasons: the compiler
was rejecting renamings of components of Volatile_Full_Access objects.
The reason was that supporting Volatile_Full_Access requires an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66293
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Sverd Johnsen from comment #0)
clang supports -Weverything which simply enables all warnings. gcc should
introduce an equivalent option.
No it shouldn't.
This is a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31573
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sverd.johnsen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66293
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
An arbitrary restriction was imposed on renaming in conjunction with the new
Aspect/Pragma Volatile_Full_Access for implementation reasons: the compiler
was rejecting renamings of components of Volatile_Full_Access objects.
This is the second part of the overhaul, tested on x86_64-suse-linux,
On 05/25/15 21:18, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 05/25/2015 04:55 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
else if (TYPE_CANONICAL (to_type) != to_type)
TYPE_CANONICAL (t)
= build_reference_type_for_mode (TYPE_CANONICAL (to_type),
mode, false);
But we're passing 'false' in
Hi!
This patch adds changes similar to those that have been added
for OpenMP 4.1 to the C FE so far. Note, taskloop with C++ class
iterators isn't yet supported and the testsuite coverage is limited too.
2015-05-26 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
gcc/c/
* c-parser.c (c_parser_pragma):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65839
--- Comment #5 from devans at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: devans
Date: Tue May 26 21:28:42 2015
New Revision: 223719
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223719root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/65839
*
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com wrote:
On 29/04/15 10:57 -0700, Doug Evans wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 5:16 AM, Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 27/04/15 15:44 -0700, Doug Evans wrote:
PR libstdc++/65839
*
/../include -I/home/wschmidt/gcc/gcc-mainline-test/gcc/../libcpp/include \
-DBASEVER=\6.0.0\ -DDATESTAMP=\ 20150526\ \
-DREVISION=\ [trunk revision 223719]\ \
-DDEVPHASE=\ (experimental)\ -DPKGVERSION=\(GCC) \ \
-DBUGURL=\http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html\ -o build
/wschmidt/gcc/gcc-mainline-test/gcc
-I/home/wsc
hmidt/gcc/gcc-mainline-test/gcc/build
-I/home/wschmidt/gcc/gcc-mainline-test/gcc
/../include -I/home/wschmidt/gcc/gcc-mainline-test/gcc/../libcpp/include \
-DBASEVER=\6.0.0\ -DDATESTAMP=\ 20150526\ \
-DREVISION=\ [trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65839
Doug Evans dje at google dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66262
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66285
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I thought that parallelizing vectorized loops is harder (you eventually get
extra prologue and epliogue loops, etc).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66262
--- Comment #5 from Gianfranco costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it ---
I'm still trying to provide what requested, as you can see there
I'm working right now on it
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=casablancasuite=experimental
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46032
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
and GOMP_task (fn1, data1, fn2, ...) performs:
if (somecond)
{
if (fn2 == 0)
fn1 (data1);
else
{
void *buf = alloca (...); // Takes care also about
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66280
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66283
--- Comment #1 from Gary Funck gary at intrepid dot com ---
FYI, this also results in a bootstrap failure for C++ on IA64, when configured
with:
CFLAGS='-g3 -O0' \
CXXFLAGS='-g3 -O0' \
$src/configure \
--prefix=$rls \
--enable-checking \
On 22/05/15 18:48 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 22/05/15 16:21 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 22/05/15 17:13 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 03:59:47PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
+ alignas(alignof(_Tp2)) unsigned char _M_storage[sizeof(_Tp)];
Is
Hi,
On Fri, 22 May 2015, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Index: tree-streamer-out.c
===
--- tree-streamer-out.c (revision 223508)
+++ tree-streamer-out.c (working copy)
@@ -346,6 +346,7 @@ pack_ts_type_common_value_fields
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 04:57:00PM +0100, Matthew Wahab wrote:
On Aarch64, the __sync builtins are implemented using the __atomic operations
and barriers. This makes the the __sync builtins inconsistent with their
documentation which requires stronger barriers than those for the __atomic
On 05/25/2015 06:42 AM, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to remove the target selector and instead add:
/* { dg-require-effective-target pie } */
...
This allows the tests to be run on Darwin and fail because the code generated
does not
match the scan-assembler:
FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66142
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
On 05/22/15 17:44:23, Jan Hubicka wrote:
PR 66181 is about ICE in verify_type that complains that type and its variant
differs
by TYPE_NO_FORCE_BLK.
Also PR 66283, on IA64. Has a small test case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64045
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65752
--- Comment #35 from Chung-Kil Hur gil.hur at sf dot snu.ac.kr ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #34)
On Sat, 23 May 2015, gil.hur at sf dot snu.ac.kr wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65752
--- Comment
Hello.
Following patch enhanced dump output for LTO balanced map.
Sample output:
Partition sizes:
partition 0 contains 2413 (13.33%) symbols and 56646 (3.62%) insns
partition 1 contains 2006 (11.08%) symbols and 55901 (3.57%) insns
partition 2 contains 1954 (10.79%) symbols and 61054 (3.90%)
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Bin.Cheng amker.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Bin Cheng bin.ch...@arm.com wrote:
Hi,
As we know, GCC is too conservative when checking overflow
Hi Richard,
Unfortunately this broke the Power builds:
/home/wschmidt/gcc/gcc-mainline-base/gcc/config/rs6000/constraints.md:211:
reference to unknown predicate 'mem_operand_gpr'
/home/wschmidt/gcc/gcc-mainline-base/gcc/config/rs6000/constraints.md:242:
reference to unknown predicate
I don't have commit access. I would appreciate if someone does that for me.
Thanks,
-Aditya
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 08:14:41 -0600
From: l...@redhat.com
To: hiradi...@msn.com; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Break when has_sample is true
I don't have commit access. I would appreciate if someone does that for me.
Thanks,
-Aditya
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 14:52:29 -0600
From: l...@redhat.com
To: hiradi...@msn.com; richard.guent...@gmail.com; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com wrote:
2 parts for maintainers
- c-family: machine descriptions export macro definitions into c
implementation : need to export 'builtin_define_with_int_value' and '
builtin_define_type_sizeof'
Could a global
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66142
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue May 26 13:55:40 2015
New Revision: 223697
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223697root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-05-26 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65752
--- Comment #37 from Chung-Kil Hur gil.hur at sf dot snu.ac.kr ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #36)
On Tue, 26 May 2015, gil.hur at sf dot snu.ac.kr wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65752
--- Comment
Some utility subprograms used in GNATprove were generally useful, and
thus are better located in GNAT frontend than in GNATprove code.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2015-05-26 Yannick Moy m...@adacore.com
* inline.adb (Has_Initialized_Type): Adapt to new names.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66246
kai-bugs at cats dot ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|i686-w64-mingw32|i686-w64-mingw32
David Edelsohn dje@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Richard Sandiford
richard.sandif...@arm.com wrote:
Bill Schmidt wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com writes:
Hi Richard,
Unfortunately this broke the Power builds:
On 05/20/2015 10:01 AM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
On 05/12/2015 02:16 PM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
On 04/07/2015 03:22 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
How are the automatic misaligned variables different from say heap
allocated ones, or global vars etc.?
No difference you are right Jakub. Shadow memory
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #44 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Any update on the timestamp issue? It still happens regularly.
Bill Schmidt wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com writes:
Hi Richard,
Unfortunately this broke the Power builds:
/home/wschmidt/gcc/gcc-mainline-base/gcc/config/rs6000/constraints.md:211:
reference to unknown predicate 'mem_operand_gpr'
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Richard Sandiford
richard.sandif...@arm.com wrote:
Bill Schmidt wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com writes:
Hi Richard,
Unfortunately this broke the Power builds:
/home/wschmidt/gcc/gcc-mainline-base/gcc/config/rs6000/constraints.md:211:
reference to unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66281
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com wrote:
On 05/26/2015 12:11 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On 13/05/15 11:16, Christian Bruel wrote:
- [2.2/6]: Redefine TARGET_MACROS for #pragma GCC target without
thumbness the glue.
Here it is, no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66030
--- Comment #2 from Hamza Alloush hamzaalloush at live dot com ---
with gcc 5.1, i also have this bug, whenever i try to cross compile boost with
mingw, as it tries to define codecvt_byname for
${BOOST_DIR}/libs/locale/src/std/codecvt.cpp
##
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66261
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Interesting ;)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66262
Gianfranco costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
On 05/25/2015 01:52 PM, Andreas Tobler wrote:
On 25.05.15 14:42, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to remove the target selector and instead add:
/* { dg-require-effective-target pie } */
...
This allows the tests to be run on Darwin and fail because the code
generated does
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66181
--- Comment #13 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ramana
Date: Tue May 26 13:21:16 2015
New Revision: 223695
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223695root=gccview=rev
Log:
Fix PR ipa/66181
2015-05-26 Ramana
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52144
--- Comment #4 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chrbr
Date: Tue May 26 14:06:17 2015
New Revision: 223699
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223699root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-05-13 Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com
PR
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-05-26 Aditya Kumar hiradi...@msn.com
* auto-profile.c (afdo_calculate_branch_prob): Break once has_sample is
true.
---
gcc/auto-profile.c | 9 +++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/auto-profile.c b/gcc/auto-profile.c
index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66208
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
On 05/23/2015 04:46 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
This patch adds descriptive names to various constants in line-map.c.
There were some differences between the constants used a various
places, but my understanding is that these differences are arbitrary
and it is easier to understand the code
The change for MIPS looks fine by visual inspection and I've built both
a default pie and default no-pie compiler. The default pie won't build
glibc but I am pretty sure it is not down to this patch. I haven't had
time to look into why it won't build though, something related to
selecting the CRT
Snapshot gcc-5-20150526 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/5-20150526/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54351
TC rs2740 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979
Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regression] [SH] |[5/6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66295
Bug ID: 66295
Summary: LTO generates incorrect resolver call for function
multiversioning
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979
--- Comment #30 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kkojima
Date: Tue May 26 22:32:11 2015
New Revision: 223721
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223721root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/65979
* config/sh/sh.md (tstsi_t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979
--- Comment #31 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kkojima
Date: Tue May 26 22:37:06 2015
New Revision: 223722
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223722root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/65979
* config/sh/sh.md (tstsi_t
Hi,
I've committed the attached patches to fix PR target/65979
which is a 5/6 regression in behalf of Oleg. The problematic
peephole can clobber a register before its use. See PR65979 for
details. The first patch is for trunk and the second one is
a slightly different version against
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Matthew Fortune
matthew.fort...@imgtec.com wrote:
The change for MIPS looks fine by visual inspection and I've built both
a default pie and default no-pie compiler. The default pie won't build
glibc but I am pretty sure it is not down to this patch. I haven't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66258
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Confirmed, happens with grub.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com wrote:
On 30/04/15 11:19 -0700, Doug Evans wrote:
Hi.
This patch adds operator- xmethod support for std::unique_ptr.
Regression tested on amd64-linux.
Ok to commit?
OK, thanks.
Committed, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66294
Bug ID: 66294
Summary: Nonsensical warning message for address-of static
member function expr through expr.B
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #45 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #44)
Any update on the timestamp issue? It still happens regularly.
I reported to overseers that the problem was not in Bugzilla,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66292
Bug ID: 66292
Summary: ICE in constexpr call evaluation
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Now the change does not really translate to great increase of
disambiguations
for Firefox (it seems more in noise). The reason is the pointer_type
globbing
in alias.c.
Yeah, we only get the improvement because of some hack in the tree
alias oracle which also uses the base object
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #46 from Frank Ch. Eigler fche at redhat dot com ---
I can add a workaround in Bugzilla itself, if that helps. Frank?
Please go ahead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59124
--- Comment #13 from Georg Müller georgmueller at gmx dot net ---
This bug is causing dpdk build failures on my fedora 22 machine:
git clone git://dpdk.org/dpdk
cd dpdk
make config T=x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
make
[...]
101 - 200 of 216 matches
Mail list logo
