[Bug libfortran/70684] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] incorrect reading of values from file on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70684 --- Comment #16 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sun Apr 24 05:07:21 2016 New Revision: 235391 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235391=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-23 Jerry DeLisle PR

[Bug c++/70776] New: ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)

-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160423 (experimental) [trunk revision 235384] (GCC) $ $ g++-trunk small.cpp -c g++-trunk: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus) Please submit a full bug report

[Bug tree-optimization/70775] New: ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160423 (experimental) [trunk revision 235384] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -O2 -c small.c $ gcc-5.3 -O3 -c small.c $ $ gcc-trunk -O3 -c small.c small.c: In function ‘fn2’: small.c:17:1: internal compiler error

[Bug c++/70774] New: constexpr function with reference parameter gives reinterpret_cast from integer to pointer error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70774 Bug ID: 70774 Summary: constexpr function with reference parameter gives reinterpret_cast from integer to pointer error Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

Re: [RFC][PATCH][PR63586] Convert x+x+x+x into 4*x

Hi Richard, As you have said in the other email, I tried implementing with the add_reapeats_to_ops_vec but the whole repeat vector is designed for MULT_EXPR chain. I tried changing it but it turned out to be not straightforward without lots of re-write. Therefore I tried to implement based

[Bug c++/70770] [5 Regression] constexpr expansion Internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70770 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/70353] [5 regression] ICE on __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ in a constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70353 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mira.fontan at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/70768] Increased compilation time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70768 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- This is the file in question: https://github.com/ericniebler/range-v3/blob/master/test/algorithm/transform.cpp

[Bug gcov-profile/70773] New: Profiling makes sudoku solver slower

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70773 Bug ID: 70773 Summary: Profiling makes sudoku solver slower Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/70768] Increased compilation time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70768 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to James Almer from comment #2) > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1) > > Well, you simply need more RAM to compile this testcase, because gcc-6 uses > > slightly over 2GB peak,

Re: [Patch AArch64] Fix PR target/63874

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 5:30 PM, James Greenhalgh wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 02:11:49PM +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: >> Hi, >> >> In this PR we have a situation where we aren't really detecting >> weak references vs weak definitions. If one has a weak

[Bug c++/70768] Increased compilation time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70768 --- Comment #2 from James Almer --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1) > Well, you simply need more RAM to compile this testcase, because gcc-6 uses > slightly over 2GB peak, so your machine starts swapping. > On my machine (with

[Bug rtl-optimization/70751] [7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/arm/eliminate.c scan-assembler-times r0,[\\t ]*sp 3 since r235184

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70751 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/69143] PowerPC64: aggregate results are badly handled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69143 --- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3) > Similar to PR 28831, PR 23782? Indeed, though looks more like a base case for PR28831 than PR23782 at first glance. Ramana

[Bug bootstrap/70704] [6 Regression] AIX bootstrap comparison failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70704 --- Comment #42 from Jakub Jelinek --- Even PATH=/opt/freeware/bin/:$PATH /home/jakub/gcc-6.0.1-RC-20160415/configure --disable-werror --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc --with-gmp=/opt/cfarm --with-libiconv-prefix=/opt/cfarm

[Bug c++/70755] [ARM] excessive struct alignment for globals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70755 --- Comment #3 from Michael Bruck --- (In reply to Michael Bruck from comment #2) > (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #1) > > This is a deliberate design choice. By doing this we gain significant > > benefits from having aligned

[Bug c++/70755] [ARM] excessive struct alignment for globals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70755 --- Comment #2 from Michael Bruck --- (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #1) > This is a deliberate design choice. By doing this we gain significant > benefits from having aligned objects, which helps with data copying and > other

[Bug c/70772] Wrong warning about unspecified behavior for comparison with string literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70772 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Cherepanov --- clang bug -- https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27495 .

[Bug libfortran/70684] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] incorrect reading of values from file on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70684 --- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Andy May from comment #14) --- snip --- > > Of course, I really appreciate the work that goes into this. I've already > made a local patch file with your fix so that the mxe.cc gcc builds with

[Bug c/70772] New: Wrong warning about unspecified behavior for comparison with string literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70772 Bug ID: 70772 Summary: Wrong warning about unspecified behavior for comparison with string literal Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

Re: [PATCH, fortran, v3] Use Levenshtein spelling suggestions in Fortran FE

On March 7, 2016 3:57:16 PM GMT+01:00, David Malcolm wrote: >On Sat, 2016-03-05 at 23:46 +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >[...] > >> diff --git a/gcc/fortran/misc.c b/gcc/fortran/misc.c >> index 405bae0..72ed311 100644 >> --- a/gcc/fortran/misc.c >> +++

[Bug tree-optimization/70771] New: ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in operator[], at vec.h:714

++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160423 (experimental) [trunk revision 235384] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c; ./a.out $ gcc-5.3 -O3 small.c; ./a.out $ $ gcc-trunk -O3 small.c small.c: In function ‘main’: small.c:18:1: internal compiler

Re: Second GCC 6.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 01:15:12PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: > Shouldn't there also be a back port of... IMHO no, as I said on IRC, that can wait for 6.2. Jakub

Re: Second GCC 6.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

nu 1.6 compatibility? On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > The second release candidate for GCC 6.1 is available from > > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/6.0.1-RC-20160423 > > and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revisio

[Bug c++/70770] constexpr expansion Internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70770 --- Comment #2 from Mira Fontan --- Created attachment 38333 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38333=edit preprocessed file

[Bug c++/70770] constexpr expansion Internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70770 --- Comment #1 from Mira Fontan --- Command line output: Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/usr/bin/g++ Target: x86_64-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu 5.3.1-14ubuntu2'

[Bug c++/70770] New: constexpr expansion Internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70770 Bug ID: 70770 Summary: constexpr expansion Internal compiler error Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/66256] noexcept evaluation done before end of class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66256 Michael Mehlich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mmehlich at semanticdesigns dot co

[Bug bootstrap/70704] [6 Regression] AIX bootstrap comparison failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70704 --- Comment #41 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #40) > I see that you did not have /opt/freeware/bin in your path on AIX. How did > it even build without GNU Make and other build requirements? I've used gmake

[Bug bootstrap/70704] [6 Regression] AIX bootstrap comparison failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70704 --- Comment #40 from David Edelsohn --- I see that you did not have /opt/freeware/bin in your path on AIX. How did it even build without GNU Make and other build requirements?

Re: [wwwdocs] Reduce use of MetaHTML for navigation

On Sun, 17 Apr 2016, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > When I initially created this in the early 2000s, CSS did barely > exist and was hardly used. Now in 2016 it makes sense to use it > fully (a first phase of conversation happened a few years ago) > and reduce our dependency on MetaHTML even further.

[PING^2] Re: [PATCH 1/4] Add gcc-auto-profile script

Andi Kleen writes: Ping^2 for the patch series! > Andi Kleen writes: > > Ping for the patch series! > >> From: Andi Kleen >> >> Using autofdo is currently something difficult. It requires using the >> model specific branches

[wwwdocs] Buildstat update for 4.8

Latest results for 4.8.x -tgc Testresults for 4.8.5: hppa1.1-hp-hpux11.11 powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu s390x-ibm-linux-gnu (3) Index: buildstat.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.8/buildstat.html,v retrieving

[Bug target/69143] PowerPC64: aggregate results are badly handled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69143 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- Similar to PR 28831, PR 23782?

[wwwdocs] Buildstat update for 5.x

Latest results for 5.x -tgc Testresults for 5.3.0: armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabi arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi hppa-unknown-linux-gnu mips-unknown-linux-gnu mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu sparc-sun-solaris2.10 sparc64-sun-solaris2.10 sparc-unknown-linux-gnu

Second GCC 6.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

The second release candidate for GCC 6.1 is available from ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/6.0.1-RC-20160423 and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 235378. I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on x86_64-linux and i686-linux. Please test

Re: [RFC][PATCH][PR40921] Convert x + (-y * z * z) into x - y * z * z

I am not sure I understand this. I tried doing this. If I add -1 and rhs1 for the NEGATE_EXPR to ops list, when it come to rewrite_expr_tree constant will be sorted early and would make it hard to generate: x + (-y * z * z) => x - y * z * z Do you want to swap the constant in MULT_EXPR

[Bug ada/70759] Ada rts fails to build with -mabi=ilp32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70759 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/70704] [6 Regression] AIX bootstrap comparison failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70704 --- Comment #39 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #38) > The gt* files don't differ. > > I normally use > > --disable-werror --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc --with-gmp=/opt/cfarm >

Re: internal_reference_types

> The function internal_reference_types appears to have been introduced > exclusively for the Ada frontend. It is responsible for PR70759 (ada > rts doesn't build with -mabi=ilp32). What purpose does it serve and > what breaks when it is removed? The history doesn't give any hints. Not clear

Re: [patch] removing aged ifdef 0 from boehm-gc/os_dep.c

On Wed, 13 Apr 2016, g...@glenstark.net wrote: > This is my first effort at contributing to gcc, so I thought I would try > with some of the easy stuff listed here: > https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/beginner.html > > Attached is a patch removing a block which has been #if 0'd out since > 2006. I

[Bug c++/70769] New: function definition wrongfully allowed inside comma separated member declaration list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70769 Bug ID: 70769 Summary: function definition wrongfully allowed inside comma separated member declaration list Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

Re: split_live_ranges_for_shrink_wrap and !SHRINK_WRAPPING_ENABLED?

2016-04-18 11:53 GMT+03:00 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj : > Hi, > > While tracking down a performance regression for the AVR target from > 4.9.x to trunk, I noticed that failing the SHRINK_WRAPPING_ENABLED > check in ira.c led to noticeably worse code for the

New hashtable power 2 rehash policy

Hi Here is a patch to introduce a new power of 2 based rehash policy. It enhances performance as it avoids modulo float operations. I have updated performance benches and here is the result: 54075.cctr1 benches 455r 446u8s 0mem0pf 54075.cc

[Bug c++/70767] std::numeric_limits::digits is wrong unless --std=c++11 used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70767 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#559 It has status CD1, I don't remember if that means it applies retroactively or not. (by the way, the 4.8 branch is not maintained anymore)

[Bug c++/70768] Increased compilation time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70768 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|