On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 22:47 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> External Email
>
> On Nov 26 2018, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>
> > I looked through the patches for the last couple of weeks to see if
> > I could identify
> > what changed here but I haven't found anything. Maybe it was
> > something in
> >
On 11/26/18 1:30 PM, cmdLP #CODE wrote:
Dear GCC-developer team,
The specification of the const-attribute is a bit ambiguous, it does not
fully specify which global variables are allowed to be read from. Obviously
constant global compile-time initialized variables can be accessed without
problem
On 11/23/18 12:31 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> GCC currently accepts the declaration of f0 below but ignores
> the attribute. On aarch64 (and I presume on other targets with
> a default function alignment greater than 1), GCC rejects f1
> with an error, even though it accepts -falign-functions=1
> wi
On Nov 26 2018, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> I looked through the patches for the last couple of weeks to see if I could
> identify
> what changed here but I haven't found anything. Maybe it was something in
> glibc that changed.
Most likely it only worked by accident so far. Last week the first
GLI
Hello,
Our company is importing for US market for this year sales :
Please provide us the following …
- Catalog
- MOQ
- Prices
- Payment and warranty terms
- Delivery time
Our business is growing well so we need to grow our number of
suppliers/partner
I am trying to do a bootstrap build of GCC using a newly built glibc in
a non standard location on my aarch64 platform (thunderx). This was working
up until a week or so ago but now I am running into a problem I haven't seen
before:
build/genautomata /home/sellcey/test-tot/src/gcc/gcc/common.md
Dear GCC-developer team,
The specification of the const-attribute is a bit ambiguous, it does not
fully specify which global variables are allowed to be read from. Obviously
constant global compile-time initialized variables can be accessed without
problem. But what about run time initialized vari
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> On 22.11.18 10:30, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > Status
> > ==
> >
> > The GCC 7 branch is open for regression and documentation fixes.
> >
> > I plan to do a GCC 7.4 release in a few weeks starting with a
> > first release candidate at the end
On 22.11.18 10:30, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> Status
> ==
>
> The GCC 7 branch is open for regression and documentation fixes.
>
> I plan to do a GCC 7.4 release in a few weeks starting with a
> first release candidate at the end of next week, likely Nov. 29th.
>
> Please go through your ass
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
> > On 22 Nov 2018, at 09:30, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> >
> > Status
> > ==
> >
> > The GCC 7 branch is open for regression and documentation fixes.
> >
> > I plan to do a GCC 7.4 release in a few weeks starting with a
> > first release candida
> On 22 Nov 2018, at 09:30, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>
> Status
> ==
>
> The GCC 7 branch is open for regression and documentation fixes.
>
> I plan to do a GCC 7.4 release in a few weeks starting with a
> first release candidate at the end of next week, likely Nov. 29th.
>
> Please go t
11 matches
Mail list logo
