On Fri, 19 Jan 2024, LIU Hao wrote:
> ? 2024-01-18 20:54, Jan Beulich ??:
> > I'm sorry, but most of your proposal may even be considered for being
> > acceptable only if you would gain buy-off from the MASM guys. Anything
> > MASM treats as valid ought to be permitted by gas as well (within the
>
[I was torn towards asking gcc@ only, individual i386 maintainers in
private or bluntly asking for help on gcc-patches or re-iterate through
ABI, so in an attempt to cut off years of latency i hereby ask all and
everybody for assistance. Stage4 means any chances are low, i know..
hence stage 1 mate
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 20:25, Ed wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, January 29, 2024 at 03:13:07 PM EST, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 19:15, Claudio Bantaloukas via Gcc
> wrote:
> >
> > On 26/01/2024 17:51, Florin Mateoc via Gcc wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I am an expe
3dw...@verizon.net
On Monday, January 29, 2024 at 03:13:07 PM EST, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 19:15, Claudio Bantaloukas via Gcc
wrote:
>
> On 26/01/2024 17:51, Florin Mateoc via Gcc wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am an experienced software developer, with
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 19:15, Claudio Bantaloukas via Gcc
wrote:
>
> On 26/01/2024 17:51, Florin Mateoc via Gcc wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am an experienced software developer, with an interest in compilers, and
> > an admirer of gcc.
> > I would like to contribute, hopefully reusing some of my
On 26/01/2024 17:51, Florin Mateoc via Gcc wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am an experienced software developer, with an interest in compilers, and
> an admirer of gcc.
> I would like to contribute, hopefully reusing some of my existing skills,
> experience and interests, but unfortunately the (current) ov
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024, 18:24 Jonathan Wakely, wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2024, 18:17 Martin Licht via Gcc, wrote:
>
>> GCC seems to have a non-standard lenient C++ overload resolution that is
>> not documented (or easy to find in the manual).
>>
>> The following C++ code compiles with GCC. Howeve
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024, 18:17 Martin Licht via Gcc, wrote:
> GCC seems to have a non-standard lenient C++ overload resolution that is
> not documented (or easy to find in the manual).
>
> The following C++ code compiles with GCC. However, it produces a warning
> about an ambiguous overload that appa
GCC seems to have a non-standard lenient C++ overload resolution that is
not documented (or easy to find in the manual).
The following C++ code compiles with GCC. However, it produces a warning
about an ambiguous overload that apparently is not acceptable by the
standard. Clang and MVSC simply
