On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 07:52:01PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 2/10/24 17:57, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
> > The fix for PR107398 weakened the restrictions that lambdas must belong
> > to namespace scope. However this was not sufficient: we also need to
> > allow lambdas keyed to FIELD_DECLs or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113895
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113895
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5fd1cbfd65ef2b6dd87cd78ce6509e7d561981ac
commit r14-9029-g5fd1cbfd65ef2b6dd87cd78ce6509e7d561981ac
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
The following addresses consistency check fails in copy_reference_ops_from_ref
when we are handling out-of-bound array accesses (it's almost impossible
to identically mimic the get_ref_base_and_extent behavior). It also
addresses the case where an out-of-bound constant offset computes to a
-1 off
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113931
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024, Paul Koning wrote:
> > On May 15, 2023, at 5:09 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > I may choose to implement a non-DWARF unwinder instead, as the VAX stack
> > frame is always fully described by the hardware and there is never ever a
> > need for debug
On 16/02/2024 10:17, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi!
On 2023-10-20T12:51:03+0100, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
I've committed this patch
... as commit c7ec7bd1c6590cf4eed267feab490288e0b8d691
"amdgcn: add -march=gfx1030 EXPERIMENTAL", which the later
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113958
Bug ID: 113958
Summary: support visibility attribute for typeinfo symbol
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113957
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113957
Bug ID: 113957
Summary: [14 Regression] bad-mapper-1.C hangs on all Darwin.
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Tested x86_64-linux, pushed to trunk.
-- >8 --
PR libstdc++/87744
PR libstdc++/113931
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* testsuite/26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc: Adjust dg-error
line number.
---
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc | 4 ++--
1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87744
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7f3d900684ad989164114f25eb46a33871c6533d
commit r14-9028-g7f3d900684ad989164114f25eb46a33871c6533d
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113931
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7f3d900684ad989164114f25eb46a33871c6533d
commit r14-9028-g7f3d900684ad989164114f25eb46a33871c6533d
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Pushed to trunk.
-- >8 --
The configure option is no longer necessary.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* doc/xml/manual/debug_mode.xml: Update docs for backtraces.
* doc/html/manual/debug_mode_using.html: Regenerate.
---
libstdc++-v3/doc/html/manual/debug_mode_using.html | 9 -
Pushed to trunk.
-- >8 --
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* doc/xml/manual/test.xml: Fix spelling of elements.
* doc/html/manual/test.html: Regenerate.
---
libstdc++-v3/doc/html/manual/test.html | 4 ++--
libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/test.xml | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 4
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 08:41:42PM -0500, Paul Koning wrote:
> > On Feb 15, 2024, at 5:56 PM, Segher Boessenkool
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 07:34:32PM +, Sam James wrote:
> >> I have now started doing this in PR113932.
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
> > Segher
>
> Presumably this
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 2023-10-20T12:51:03+0100, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> > I've committed this patch
>
> ... as commit c7ec7bd1c6590cf4eed267feab490288e0b8d691
> "amdgcn: add -march=gfx1030 EXPERIMENTAL", which the later RDNA3/gfx1100
> support builds on top
Hi!
Given the recent discussions on IRC started with Andrew P. mentioning that
an asm goto outputs test should have { target lra } and the lra effective
target in GCC 11/12 only returning 0 for PA and in 13/14 for PA/AVR, while
we clearly have 14 other targets which don't support LRA and a couple
*sge_ pattern has referenced operand[2] which is
invalid...it should just use `slti` rather than `slti%i2`.
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR target/106543
* config/riscv/riscv.md (*sge_): Fix asm
pattern.
---
gcc/config/riscv/riscv.md | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106543
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kito Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:325d5dd53270fe8fd62b36c92c8f8b87c2938bf1
commit r14-9025-g325d5dd53270fe8fd62b36c92c8f8b87c2938bf1
Author: Kito Cheng
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113951
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Ever
Hi!
On 2023-10-20T12:51:03+0100, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> I've committed this patch
... as commit c7ec7bd1c6590cf4eed267feab490288e0b8d691
"amdgcn: add -march=gfx1030 EXPERIMENTAL", which the later RDNA3/gfx1100
support builds on top of, and that's what I'm currently working on
getting proper
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113932
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113928
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||13.2.1, 14.0
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106060
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
--- Comment #5 from Roger Sayle
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 7:38 PM Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look
> OK for trunk?
Btw, there's the "bitpack" streaming support in data-streamer.h also
added for exactly the same reason, it's likely not easily re-usable
but this kind of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106530
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109349
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
Hi!
For template parameters, the optional this specifier is in the grammar
template-parameter-list -> template-parameter -> parameter-declaration,
just [dcl.fct/6] says that it is only valid in parameter-list of certain
functions. So, unlike the case of decl-specifier-seq used in non-terminals
Hi!
DWARF5 added DW_AT_export_symbols both for use on inline namespaces (where
we emit it), but also on anonymous unions/structs (and we didn't emit that
attribute there).
The following patch fixes it.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
2024-02-16 Jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111267
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113895
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Zhendong Su from comment #8)
> extern void f();
> char a[1][1], b;
> int main() {
> int c = -1U;
> if (b)
> f(a[c][b]);
> return 0;
> }
for this case, while it's also
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113690
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14 Regression] ICE: in |[13 Regression] ICE: in
Hi!
The simple presence of ellipsis as next token after the parameter
declaration doesn't imply it is a parameter pack, it sometimes is, e.g.
if its type is a pack, but sometimes is not and in that case it acts
the same as if the next tokens were , ... instead of just ...
The xobj param cannot be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98237
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98237
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Rainer Orth :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:de658585d6dcc89f1cba71ef5f8f5b55719a7054
commit r14-9024-gde658585d6dcc89f1cba71ef5f8f5b55719a7054
Author: Rainer Orth
Date: Fri
gcc.dg/lto/modref-3 etc. FAIL on Solaris with the native linker:
FAIL: gcc-dg-lto-modref-3-01.exe scan-wpa-ipa-dump modref "parm 1 flags:
no_direct_clobber no_direct_escape"
FAIL: gcc-dg-lto-modref-4-01.exe scan-wpa-ipa-dump modref "parm 1 flags:
no_direct_clobber no_direct_escape"
FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113895
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Other testcase with -O3:
long a, b, c;
int d;
long e[2][1];
int f() {
if (c == a)
c = b;
}
void g() {
int h, i = 0;
for (; f() + d + i; i++)
e[h][i] = 4;
}
void main() {}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113898
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 51848, which changed state.
Bug 51848 Summary: GCC is not able to vectorize when a constant value is also
added to the sum of array expression inside a loop.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51848
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51848
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112508
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
We are already doing
/* Verify whether the candidate is hot for LOOP. Only do store motion if the
candidate's profile count is hot. Statement in cold BB shouldn't be moved
out of it's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113956
Bug ID: 113956
Summary: ice in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment, at
fortran/trans-expr.cc:10524
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112508
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Loop store-motion is a difficult thing to cost - it's a critical enabler for
many of our loop optimizations, including scalar evolution analysis.
Now, this might not hold true so much for the cases where
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113898
Shaohua Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
201 - 245 of 245 matches
Mail list logo