Simplify \r checking with regex globs.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Yong <10wa...@gmail.com>
gcc/testsuite
* g++.dg/contracts/contracts14.C: simplify \r regex.
* g++.dg/contracts/contracts15.C: ditto
* g++.dg/contracts/contracts16.C: ditto
*
git commit g:44dc9e765b7744067c5070a70d4076c077b64be4
gcc-descr r13-8528-g44dc9e765b7744
power8
Linux 5.4.0-174-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.2.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 31 03:42:26 UTC 2024
git commit g:49b651b663086d03490eb18bcc45a5f0189785a1
gcc-descr r11-11301-g49b651b663086d
power9
Linux 5.15.0-97-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 31 04:20:59 UTC 2024
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Mar 30 18:05:09 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9728-g6fc84f680d0)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: cb1010a
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is s390x-ibm-linux-gnu arch14
git commit g:c259707748a2933c12bded17b5efe116835acbc9
gcc-descr r12-10301-gc259707748a293
power9
Linux 5.15.0-97-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 31 03:14:06 UTC 2024
git commit g:c259707748a2933c12bded17b5efe116835acbc9
gcc-descr r12-10301-gc259707748a293
power9 IEEE128
Linux 6.8.0-0.rc6.20240229git805d849d7c3c.51.fc41.ppc64le ppc64le
GNU Make 4.4.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
git commit g:49b651b663086d03490eb18bcc45a5f0189785a1
gcc-descr r11-11301-g49b651b663086d
power8
Linux 5.4.0-174-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.2.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 31 02:16:15 UTC 2024
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114030
--- Comment #3 from absoler at smail dot nju.edu.cn ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Reduced testcase:
> ```
> union U0 {
>int f2;
>char f4;
> };
>
> int g_3;
> union U0 g_34 = {-1L};
> char func_1() {
> int t11 =
git commit g:44dc9e765b7744067c5070a70d4076c077b64be4
gcc-descr r13-8528-g44dc9e765b7744
power9 IEEE128
Linux 6.8.0-0.rc6.20240229git805d849d7c3c.51.fc41.ppc64le ppc64le
GNU Make 4.4.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
git commit g:44dc9e765b7744067c5070a70d4076c077b64be4
gcc-descr r13-8528-g44dc9e765b7744
power9
Linux 5.15.0-97-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 31 01:50:00 UTC 2024
git commit g:86d83ff4e46aac0cc6570b2e5d1e273f0837fb00
gcc-descr r14-9729-g86d83ff4e46aac
power8
Linux 5.4.0-174-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.2.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 31 00:19:53 UTC 2024
git commit g:86d83ff4e46aac0cc6570b2e5d1e273f0837fb00
gcc-descr r14-9729-g86d83ff4e46aac
power9 IEEE128
Linux 6.8.0-0.rc6.20240229git805d849d7c3c.51.fc41.ppc64le ppc64le
GNU Make 4.4.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
git commit g:86d83ff4e46aac0cc6570b2e5d1e273f0837fb00
gcc-descr r14-9729-g86d83ff4e46aac
power9
Linux 5.15.0-97-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 31 00:20:53 UTC 2024
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 31 01:00:08 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9729-g86d83ff4e46)
Target is pru-unknown-elf
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
Running target pru-sim
FAIL: c-c++-common/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-11.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL:
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Mar 29 14:40:04 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9725-g28dca4be504)
Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/guality/pr55665.C -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
-fno-fat-lto-objects line 23 p == 40
FAIL:
lgtm
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 8:07 PM wrote:
>
> From: Pan Li
>
> This patch would like to fix below misspelled term in error message.
>
> ../../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vector-builtins.cc:4592:16: error:
> misspelled term 'builtin function' in format; use 'built-in function' instead
>
LGTM
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 9:35 PM wrote:
>
> From: Pan Li
>
> This patch would like to fix one unused variable as below:
>
> ../../gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc: In static member function
> 'static riscv_subset_list* riscv_subset_list::parse(const char*, location_t)':
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114210
--- Comment #3 from Sirraide ---
Ah, that makes sense: it’s basically treated like any other top-level
cv-qualifier on a function parameter—it’s just that it happens to syntactically
be in an unusual place compared to cv-qualifiers on regular
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114210
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Exactly like the following standard C23 code:
```
void nonrestirct();
void restirctcall();
void
foo (int* a, int* __restrict b, int n);
void
foo (int* a, int* b, int n)
{
typeof(b) c = b;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114210
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note the class method is similar to how normal functions work:
```
void
foo (int* __restrict b);
void
foo (int* b)
{
static_assert(__is_same(decltype(b), int*));
}
void
foo1 (int* b);
void
foo1
ed testcases 1
# of unsupported tests 8953
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-release-1-intel64/bld/gcc/xgcc version 13.2.1
20240330 [releases/gcc-13 r13-8525-gb7b4ef2ff20] (GCC)
=== gfortran tests ===
Running target unix
=== gfortran Summary for uni
Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-8525 vs commit r13-8504 on
Linux/x86_64
New failures:
New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O
-flto -save-temps
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp-2.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
Regressions on master at commit r14-9728 vs commit r14-9725 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O
-flto -save-temps
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp-2.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
-fno-fat-lto-objects
of unsupported tests 3437
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes601535
# of unexpected failures401
# of unexpected successes 59
# of expected failures 4657
# of unsupported tests 10826
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-master-
\t%v[0-9]*,%v[0-9]*\\n\\t[^:]+\\tlocghine\\t%r2,1
XPASS: gcc.target/s390/vxe/popcount-1.c scan-assembler vpopctb\\t%v24,%v24
XPASS: gcc.target/s390/vxe/popcount-1.c scan-assembler vpopcth\\t%v24,%v24
=== gcc Summary for unix/-m64 ===
# of expected passes180693
# of unexpected f
Hello,
I actually forgot to CC the mailing list as I promised to, so
re-sending.
Sorry,
Martin
On Sat, Mar 30 2024, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hello,
>
> and sorry for replying late, I have faced a few urgent interruptions
> last week and unfortunately it is also a short week because of Easter -
Hello Abhinav,
sorry for a very brief answer, I'm not much online during Easter (the
timing of the application deadline is a bit unfortunate in this regard).
On Sat, Mar 30 2024, Abhinav Gupta wrote:
> Hello GCC community,
> Since resuming work for the GSoC proposal recently, I have made
>
Snapshot gcc-13-20240330 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/13-20240330/
and on various mirrors, see https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 13 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90181
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647832.html
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 27 2024, Soumya Ranjan wrote:
> Hello!
> Thanks for your response Martin!
> Sorry for the late response, I've been researching the project, going over
> the source code and preparing the proposal. After a lot of thought, I've
> decided to go with the "Offloading to a separate
Hello Anuj,
On Thu, Mar 28 2024, Anuj Mohite wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm Anuj M, an undergraduate student interested in participating in GSoC
> 2024 with GCC. I would like to work on the project improving the DO
> CONCURRENT construct in the GFortran compiler.The current implementation in
> GFortran has
Investigating GDB PR d/31580 showed that the libiberty demangler
doesn't automatically demangle D mangled names. However, I think it
should -- like C++ and Rust (new-style), D mangled names are readily
distinguished by the leading "_D", and so the likelihood of confusion
is low. The other
an-tree-dump-times ompexp
"xyzzy, 4" 1
FAIL: c-c++-common/gomp/atomic-3.c -std=gnu++20 scan-tree-dump-times ompexp
"xyzzy, 4" 1
FAIL: c-c++-common/gomp/atomic-9.c -std=gnu++98 scan-tree-dump-times ompexp
"__atomic_fetch_add" 1
FAIL: c-c++-common/gomp/atomic-9.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97820
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114534
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114534
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114534
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114532
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-03-30
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114534
Bug ID: 114534
Summary: Feature request: extend VLA support in C++
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66487
--- Comment #30 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #29)
> (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #28)
> > The bug is about the issue of lacking diagnostics, it should be fine to make
> > note of various
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66487
--- Comment #29 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #28)
> The bug is about the issue of lacking diagnostics, it should be fine to make
> note of various approaches to remedy the problem in one bug report.
>
OK,
Hello GCC community,
Since resuming work for the GSoC proposal recently, I have made
significant progress in understanding the code snippets provided by
Mr. Jambor and delved into the libgomp folder, compiling random
snippets in the examples folder and reading the IR. Building GCC from
source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Hi Paul,
I had only a quick glance at your patch. I guess you unintentionally
forgot to remove those parts that you already committed for PR110987,
along with the finalize-testcases.
I am still trying to find the precise paragraph in the standard
you refer to regarding INTENT(OUT) and default
xgcc version 14.0.1 20240330 (experimental)
[master r14-9728-g6fc84f680d0] (GCC)
=== gdc tests ===
Running target unix
=== gdc Summary ===
# of expected passes13860
# of unsupported tests 1
/home/toon/scratch/bld97510/gcc/gdc ver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112844
--- Comment #2 from Petr Skocik ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> With -Os you ask the code to be small. So, while internally the hint is
> still present in edge probabilities, -Os is considered more important and
> certain
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 04:06:58PM +, Qing Zhao wrote:
> This is the 8th version of the patch.
Thanks for the updated version!
I've done a full Linux kernel build and run through my behavioral
regression test suite. Everything is working as expected.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109926
--- Comment #11 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #10)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8)
> > Comment on attachment 55135 [details]
> > config
> >
> > configure:18893: checking fenv.h usability
> >
On 2024-03-15 10:25, Tom Tromey wrote:
> gdb used to use a mish-mash of different approaches, some quite strange,
> but over the last few years we standardized on Python scripts that
> generate files. They're written to be seamless -- just invoke in the
> source dir; the output is then just
From: Pan Li
This patch would like to fix one unused variable as below:
../../gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc: In static member function
'static riscv_subset_list* riscv_subset_list::parse(const char*, location_t)':
../../gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc:1501:19: error: unused
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109926
--- Comment #10 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8)
> Comment on attachment 55135 [details]
> config
>
> configure:18893: checking fenv.h usability
> configure:18893: i586-msdosdjgpp-c++ -c -g -O2 -std=c++11
>
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Mar 29 13:30:07 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9723-ge162228e0ba)
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/example.c -O0 execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/example.c -Og -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109926
--- Comment #9 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8)
> Comment on attachment 55135 [details]
> config
>
> configure:18893: checking fenv.h usability
> configure:18893: i586-msdosdjgpp-c++ -c -g -O2 -std=c++11
>
../../gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc: In static member function
'static riscv_subset_list* riscv_subset_list::parse(const char*, location_t)':
../../gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc:1501:19: error: unused variable
'itr' [-Werror=unused-variable]
1501 | riscv_subset_t *itr;
Christophe Lyon writes:
> Fix a few typos: the generated filename is m2.info (not gm2.info, and
> gm2$(exeext) is a file not a directory (so test -d would always fail).
>
> 2024-03-29 Christophe Lyon
>
> gcc/m2/
> * Make-lang.in (m2.install-info): Fix rule.
> ---
>
Christophe Lyon writes:
> This rule was missing, and 'make install-html' was failing.
> It is copied from the corresponding one in fortran.
>
> 2024-03-29 Christophe Lyon
>
> gcc/m2/
> * Make-lang.in (install-html): New rule.
> ---
> gcc/m2/Make-lang.in | 19 +++
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114533
Bug ID: 114533
Summary: libquadmath: printf: fix misaligned access on args
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
From: Pan Li
This patch would like to fix below misspelled term in error message.
../../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vector-builtins.cc:4592:16: error:
misspelled term 'builtin function' in format; use 'built-in function' instead
[-Werror=format-diag]
4592 | "builtin function %qE
I think that I didn't fully understand the project, so I read more and
updated the Timeline Suggestion.
Suggested Timeline:
-
May 1-26:
-
Explore Cython modules and try more realistic codes to see how it
translates Python to c/c++.
-
Know more about
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/loongarch/genopts/loongarch.opt.in: Mark -m[no-]recip as
aliases to -mrecip={all,none}, respectively.
* config/loongarch/loongarch.opt: Regenerate.
* config/loongarch/loongarch-def.h (ABI_FPU_64): Rename to...
(ABI_FPU64_P): ...this.
Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-8525 vs commit r13-8504 on
Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-11.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for
excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-2.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess
errors)
New passes:
942
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes565465
# of unexpected failures323
# of unexpected successes 69
# of expected failures 4569
# of unresolved testcases 2
# of unsupported tests 8953
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-re
of unsupported tests 3433
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes601565
# of unexpected failures401
# of unexpected successes 59
# of expected failures 4657
# of unsupported tests 10814
/export/project/git/gcc-test-master-intel64/b
Regressions on master at commit r14-9728 vs commit r14-9718 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp-2.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
-fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107426
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #10 from Mikael
2078
# of unexpected failures170
# of unexpected successes 14
# of expected failures 1468
# of unsupported tests 3885
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-12/gcc/xgcc version 12.3.1 20240330
[remotes/origin/releases/gcc-12 r12-10300-g5f0ca7c79e] (GCC)
1
/opt/gcc/gcc-20240330/Build/./gcc/gccgo version 14.0.1 20240330 (experimental)
[master r14-9728-g6fc84f680d098f] (GCC)
=== libgomp tests ===
Running target unix/-mabi=lp64
=== libgomp Summary ===
# of expected passes16260
# of expected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114532
Bug ID: 114532
Summary: gcc -fno-common option causes performance degradation
on certain architectures
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
v1 -> v2:
- Rebased to master.
- Specifies "(void)" for the empty parameter list of loongarch_global_init.
v2 -> v3:
- Keep the original option-processing behavior (-march=la664 enables
-mrecip=all)
and fix the ICE when -mfrecipe is not passed with -mrecip.
v3 -> v4:
- Rewrite changelog.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78664
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107426
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mikael at gcc dot
gnu.org
Hi All,
This bug emerged in a large code and involves possible recursion with a
"hidden" module procedure; ie. where the symtree name starts with '@'. This
throws the format decoder. As the last message in the PR shows, I have
vacillated between silently passing on the possible recursion or
htly/build-gcc-13/gcc/xgcc version 13.2.1 20240330
[releases/gcc-13 r13-8527-g1ab646f678] (GCC)
=== gfortran tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90 -O0 execution test
XPASS: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90 -O1 execution
3491
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-release-1-ia32/bld/gcc/xgcc version 13.2.1
20240330 [releases/gcc-13 r13-8525-gb7b4ef2ff20] (GCC)
=== gfortran tests ===
Running target unix
=== gfortran Summary ===
# of expected passes68075
# of expected fail
f expected failures 1550
# of unsupported tests 3991
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-13/gcc/xgcc version 13.2.1 20240330
[releases/gcc-13 r13-8527-g1ab646f678] (GCC)
=== gfortran tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2
1527
# of unsupported tests 3476
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-release-1-ia32/bld/gcc/xgcc version 13.2.1
20240330 [releases/gcc-13-ia32 r13-8525-gb7b4ef2ff20] (GCC)
=== gfortran tests ===
Running target unix
=== gfortran Summary ===
# of expected passes
htly/build-gcc-13/gcc/xgcc version 13.2.1 20240330
[releases/gcc-13 r13-8525-gb7b4ef2ff2] (GCC)
=== gfortran tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90 -O0 execution test
XPASS: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90 -O1 execution
Add descriptions for the compilation options '-mfrecipe' '-mdiv32'
'-mlam-bh' '-mlamcas' and '-mld-seq-sa'.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* doc/invoke.texi: Add descriptions for the compilation
options.
---
gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 45 +++--
1 file changed,
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Mar 29 11:46:00 UTC 2024 (revision
cbed07845708f01a122e02016660a9152e5c14ff)
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is sparc-sun-solaris2.11
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Mar 29 11:46:00 UTC 2024 (revision
cbed07845708f01a122e02016660a9152e5c14ff)
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Mar 29 11:46:00 UTC 2024 (revision
cbed07845708f01a122e02016660a9152e5c14ff)
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Mar 29 11:53:12 UTC 2024 (revision
57769b568dac9dcc749ca8e890ccea4f0fc7de53)
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Mar 29 11:53:12 UTC 2024 (revision
57769b568dac9dcc749ca8e890ccea4f0fc7de53)
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112407
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #8)
> Created attachment 57835 [details]
> An alternative fix for the PR
>
> Hi Tomas,
>
> Would you prefer the compiler to give warning rather than letting the
>
ion 13.2.1 20240330
[releases/gcc-13 r13-8527-g1ab646f678] (GCC)
=== gfortran tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: gfortran.dg/default_format_2.f90 -O0 execution test
XPASS: gfortran.dg/default_format_2.f90 -O1 execution test
XPASS: gfortran.dg/default_format_2.f90 -O2
150367
# of unexpected failures176
# of unexpected successes 33
# of expected failures 985
# of unresolved testcases 2
# of unsupported tests 3760
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-11/gcc/xgcc version 11.4.1 20240330
[releases/gcc-1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111632
--- Comment #23 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Gerald Pfeifer from comment #22)
> (In reply to Dimitry Andric from comment #21)
> > Indeed, please merge both commits:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;
> >
Regressions on native/releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-8525 vs commit r13-8504 on
Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O
-flto -save-temps
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-10.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for
excess errors)
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Mar 30 04:40:05 UTC 2024 (revision r13-8525-gb7b4ef2ff20)
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-4.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/torture/conftest-1.c -O0 (test
89 matches
Mail list logo
