Re: Remove RMS from the GCC Steering Committee

On 3/30/21 11:34 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 at 11:14, Andrew Haley wrote: >> We could just rename it to "GCC", in much the same way that Acorn Risc >> Machine became Advanced Risc Machines, then just "Arm". But I'd much >> prefer that the FSF got its house in order. > >

Re: Remove RMS from the GCC Steering Committee

On 3/30/21 10:47 AM, Didier Kryn wrote: > Le 30/03/2021 à 10:25, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc a écrit : >> I've been asking myself what benefit GCC gets from being linked to GNU and >> all I can think of is the DNS records for gcc.gnu.org. > >     Can you remind the meaning of GCC. Isn't it "*GNU*

Re: Integer division on x86 -m32

On 11/12/2020 07:12, Marc Glisse wrote: > On Thu, 10 Dec 2020, Lucas de Almeida via Gcc wrote: > >> when performing (int64_t) foo / (int32_t) bar in gcc under x86, a call to >> __divdi3 is always output, even though it seems the use of the idiv >> instruction could be faster. > > IIRC, idiv

Re: Should ARMv8-A generic tuning default to -moutline-atomics

On 5/1/20 11:48 AM, JiangNing OS via Gcc-patches wrote: > In reality, a lot of users are still using old gcc versions running on new > hardware. OpenJDK is a typical example, I think. We can change the OpenJDK build scripts to use -moutline-atomics if it's available. I agree with Richard that we

Re: Should ARMv8-A generic tuning default to -moutline-atomics

On 4/29/20 1:54 PM, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote: > * Kyrylo Tkachov: > >> Hi Florian, >>> >>> Distributions are receiving requests to build things with >>> -moutline-atomics: >>> >>> >>> >>> Should this be reflected in the GCC upstream