Re: PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline

Roman Zippel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/28/2007 07:54:43 PM: Hi, Notice that it generates the (i + 1) * 4 instead of (i * 4) + 4 as with the other cases. While I tried to debug this I narrowed it down to the changes in fold_binary(), but I don't really know how to fix this, so I could

Status of the pointer_plus branch

Hi, I am not asking right now to merge this branch to the mainline, I think it needs more eyes on the code. But here is the current status of the branch. It bootstraps and tests on i686-linux-gnu with two regressions. It builds/tests for spu-elf with two regressions (the same as the x86

Re: Yara status on PPC (powerpc-darwin)

Just to follow up on this email since I looked into some of the issues a little more last night. Andrew Pinski/RD/SCEA wrote on 04/17/2006 08:21:01 AM: I decided to look into the Yara branch to see if it could even be bootstrap on PPC (with Yara turned on by default). I ran into an ICE

Yara status on PPC (powerpc-darwin)

I decided to look into the Yara branch to see if it could even be bootstrap on PPC (with Yara turned on by default). I ran into an ICE while compiling libgcc2.c for __muldi3. The ICE was in emit_secondary_memory_move. The preprocessed source is: typedef int SItype __attribute__ ((mode (SI)));