On Saturday, October 20, 2012 7:50 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
[...snip...] Let me hypothesize a different interface:
This stays the same...
constexpr int constexpr_strncmp(const char *p, const char *q, size_t n) {
return !n ? 0 : *p != *q ? *p - *q : !*p ? 0 : constexpr_strncmp(p+1,
q+1,
Hi,
Please can I bump this patch and ask for it to be approved and committed:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg01711.html
The patch is to implement the C built-in function __builtin_choose_expr(...)
in C++.
I'm afraid I am new to contributing to GCC, so I hope I am going about this
On Friday, October 21, 2011 4:42 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Andy Gibbs wrote:
Hi,
Please can I bump this patch and ask for it to be approved and
committed:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg01711.html
Have you sent in your copyright assignment papers
Andy Gibbs wrote on 18th October 2011 at 1:36 PM:
Paolo Carlini wrote on 18th October 2011 at 12:00 PM:
I'm under the impression that some tests are written in C, wouldn't better
fit in c-c++-common?
Ok, I can do this but I think only 2 out of the 8 tests can be moved
across. I
# of unresolved testcases 1
# of unsupported tests 160
This is my first patch contributed to GCC. I hope that I have met the required
quality standard! I will be happy to answer any questions / reformat the patch
as necessary...
Regards,
Andy
=
Changelog:
2011-10-17 Andy
- Original Message -
From: Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
To: Andy Gibbs andyg1...@hotmail.co.uk
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; i...@google.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: [C++ Patch] __builtin_choose_expr
I'm under the impression that some tests
